Re: [OE-core] qt4e-demo-image with meta-fsl-arm: successful build?
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Eric Bénard e...@eukrea.com wrote: the strange thing is why do you get a X qtdemo when building qt4e-demo-image ? I haven't begun debugging yet, but I had 2 initial thoughts as to why the X error message: 1. The qtdemo init seems to be written to support both x and x-free setups, so perhaps the init is getting confused 2. I had built the x11-free version of qt prior to the qte version, so perhaps that causes the issue I started a clean build just in case #2 is the cause. Steve I've launched a build and will test on my imx28evk asap. Eric ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] qt4e-demo-image with meta-fsl-arm: successful build?
And of course I should have mentioned in my first email that I am using the danny branch of both repositories! Steve On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Steve Sakoman sako...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Eric Bénard e...@eukrea.com wrote: the strange thing is why do you get a X qtdemo when building qt4e-demo-image ? I haven't begun debugging yet, but I had 2 initial thoughts as to why the X error message: 1. The qtdemo init seems to be written to support both x and x-free setups, so perhaps the init is getting confused 2. I had built the x11-free version of qt prior to the qte version, so perhaps that causes the issue I started a clean build just in case #2 is the cause. Steve I've launched a build and will test on my imx28evk asap. Eric ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] qt4e-demo-image with meta-fsl-arm: successful build?
Le Mon, 10 Jun 2013 05:58:42 -0700, Steve Sakoman sako...@gmail.com a écrit : On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Eric Bénard e...@eukrea.com wrote: the strange thing is why do you get a X qtdemo when building qt4e-demo-image ? I haven't begun debugging yet, but I had 2 initial thoughts as to why the X error message: 1. The qtdemo init seems to be written to support both x and x-free setups, so perhaps the init is getting confused 2. I had built the x11-free version of qt prior to the qte version, so perhaps that causes the issue I started a clean build just in case #2 is the cause. OK #2 is clearly a situation I avoid here as this created me some troubles in the past. Eric ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] qt4e-demo-image with meta-fsl-arm: successful build?
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 6:07 AM, Eric Bénard e...@eukrea.com wrote: Le Mon, 10 Jun 2013 05:58:42 -0700, Steve Sakoman sako...@gmail.com a écrit : I haven't begun debugging yet, but I had 2 initial thoughts as to why the X error message: 1. The qtdemo init seems to be written to support both x and x-free setups, so perhaps the init is getting confused 2. I had built the x11-free version of qt prior to the qte version, so perhaps that causes the issue I started a clean build just in case #2 is the cause. OK #2 is clearly a situation I avoid here as this created me some troubles in the past. And it created issues for me too :-) A clean build of qt4e-demo-image works. A clean build of a similar image based on qt4-x11-free however is broken as described in my original post. Clearly one must choose either qt4-x11-free or qt4e, having both in the same build setup is broken (perhaps by design) Steve ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] qt4e-demo-image with meta-fsl-arm: successful build?
On Monday 10 June 2013 08:43:38 Steve Sakoman wrote: On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 6:07 AM, Eric Bénard e...@eukrea.com wrote: Le Mon, 10 Jun 2013 05:58:42 -0700, Steve Sakoman sako...@gmail.com a écrit : I haven't begun debugging yet, but I had 2 initial thoughts as to why the X error message: 1. The qtdemo init seems to be written to support both x and x-free setups, so perhaps the init is getting confused 2. I had built the x11-free version of qt prior to the qte version, so perhaps that causes the issue I started a clean build just in case #2 is the cause. OK #2 is clearly a situation I avoid here as this created me some troubles in the past. And it created issues for me too :-) A clean build of qt4e-demo-image works. A clean build of a similar image based on qt4-x11-free however is broken as described in my original post. Clearly one must choose either qt4-x11-free or qt4e, having both in the same build setup is broken (perhaps by design) I can say this is not by design. The two should be able to coexist (which is why the library names are different); if they currently cannot we need to figure out why that is and get it fixed. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
[OE-core] qt4e-demo-image with meta-fsl-arm: successful build?
Has anyone successfully built (and run!) the qt4e-demo-image with meta-fsl-arm? I tried a build for a machine based on imx28evk and get a broken image (i.e. demo fails to start at boot): QIconvCodec::convertFromUnicode: using Latin-1 for conversion, iconv_open failed QIconvCodec::convertToUnicode: using Latin-1 for conversion, iconv_open failed Unable to load library icui18n Cannot load library icui18n: (libicui18n.so.36: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory) qtdemo: cannot connect to X server Before I dig in and start debugging I thought I would check to see if anyone else has had success with this layer/machine combo. Thanks! Steve ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
