On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 6:19 PM Khem Raj wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 7:36 AM Nicolas Dechesne
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 4:08 PM Khem Raj wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 4:26 AM Otavio Salvador
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 8:58 AM Burton,
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 7:36 AM Nicolas Dechesne
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 4:08 PM Khem Raj wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 4:26 AM Otavio Salvador
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 8:58 AM Burton, Ross
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Patch has been accepted, so we ne
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 4:08 PM Khem Raj wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 4:26 AM Otavio Salvador
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 8:58 AM Burton, Ross wrote:
> > >
> > > Patch has been accepted, so we need to cherry-pick the patch I mentioned.
> >
> > We will wait for 19.0.1 to be out
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 4:26 AM Otavio Salvador
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 8:58 AM Burton, Ross wrote:
> >
> > Patch has been accepted, so we need to cherry-pick the patch I mentioned.
>
> We will wait for 19.0.1 to be out to go to meson, so it will be
> applied there for sure.
>
I am st
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 8:58 AM Burton, Ross wrote:
>
> Patch has been accepted, so we need to cherry-pick the patch I mentioned.
We will wait for 19.0.1 to be out to go to meson, so it will be
applied there for sure.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
http://www.ossyst
Patch has been accepted, so we need to cherry-pick the patch I mentioned.
Ross
On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 at 20:26, Burton, Ross wrote:
>
> I'm also not convinced this was right and have submitted
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2019-February/215791.html.
> When that is reviewed we'll
I'm also not convinced this was right and have submitted
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2019-February/215791.html.
When that is reviewed we'll know whether this change is fine, or we
should pick a the patch.
Ross
On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 at 19:04, Burton, Ross wrote:
>
> So far:
>
>
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 4:05 PM Burton, Ross wrote:
>
> So far:
>
> rburton: according to this commit it's intentional:
> cc15460e182148292be877bec5a8a61cec57377d
> although I'm not sure that patch was correct now, it looks
> like autotools has generated a 1.1.0 since 2014
>
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019
So far:
rburton: according to this commit it's intentional:
cc15460e182148292be877bec5a8a61cec57377d
although I'm not sure that patch was correct now, it looks
like autotools has generated a 1.1.0 since 2014
On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 at 18:54, Burton, Ross wrote:
>
> packages/corei7-64-poky-linux/mesa
packages/corei7-64-poky-linux/mesa/libgles1-mesa: FILELIST: removed
"/usr/lib/libGLESv1_CM.so.1.1.0", added
"/usr/lib/libGLESv1_CM.so.1.0.0"
Is that intentional? Looks like a version mistake in the meson.build.
Ross
--
___
Openembedded-core mailing li
- Remove all non related meson patches
- Change radeon driver to r100
Based on https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/158748/
Signed-off-by: Fabio Berton
---
...0001-Simplify-wayland-scanner-lookup.patch | 42 --
...ing-include-stddef.h-in-egldevice.h.patch} | 4 +-
...k-for-
11 matches
Mail list logo