Re: [OE-core] Using MACHINE_FEATURES in a native recipe

2017-03-26 Thread Jussi Kukkonen
> > Sent: den 25 mars 2017 11:27 > > To: Peter Kjellerstedt; Andre McCurdy; OE Core mailing list > > Subject: Re: [OE-core] Using MACHINE_FEATURES in a native recipe > > > > On Fri, 2017-03-24 at 15:10 +, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote: > > > Even though I a

Re: [OE-core] Using MACHINE_FEATURES in a native recipe

2017-03-25 Thread Peter Kjellerstedt
Subject: Re: [OE-core] Using MACHINE_FEATURES in a native recipe > > On Fri, 2017-03-24 at 15:10 +, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote: > > Even though I agree this is a good change and that it should be done, > > I wonder if we can either hold it off until after Pyro has been &g

Re: [OE-core] Using MACHINE_FEATURES in a native recipe

2017-03-25 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2017-03-24 at 15:10 +, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote: > Even though I agree this is a good change and that it should be done, > I wonder if we can either hold it off until after Pyro has been > released or make it possible to avoid it? The reason for this is that > I know that this change

Re: [OE-core] Using MACHINE_FEATURES in a native recipe

2017-03-24 Thread Peter Kjellerstedt
> -Original Message- > From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org > [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of > Richard Purdie > Sent: den 23 mars 2017 17:43 > To: Andre McCurdy; OE Core mailing list > Subject: Re: [OE-core] U

Re: [OE-core] Using MACHINE_FEATURES in a native recipe

2017-03-23 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 14:42 -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: > Currently native.bbclass clears MACHINEOVERRIDES but leaves > MACHINE_FEATURES alone. Is that an oversight? Or is there ever a > legitimate reason for a native recipe to have a dependency on > MACHINE_FEATURES? There is no good reason.

Re: [OE-core] Using MACHINE_FEATURES in a native recipe

2017-03-22 Thread Khem Raj
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: >>> Currently native.bbclass clears MACHINEOVERRIDES but leaves >>>

Re: [OE-core] Using MACHINE_FEATURES in a native recipe

2017-03-22 Thread Andre McCurdy
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: >> Currently native.bbclass clears MACHINEOVERRIDES but leaves >> MACHINE_FEATURES alone. Is that an oversight? Or is there ever a >> legitimate

Re: [OE-core] Using MACHINE_FEATURES in a native recipe

2017-03-22 Thread Khem Raj
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: > Currently native.bbclass clears MACHINEOVERRIDES but leaves > MACHINE_FEATURES alone. Is that an oversight? Or is there ever a > legitimate reason for a native recipe to have a dependency on > MACHINE_FEATURES?

[OE-core] Using MACHINE_FEATURES in a native recipe

2017-03-22 Thread Andre McCurdy
Currently native.bbclass clears MACHINEOVERRIDES but leaves MACHINE_FEATURES alone. Is that an oversight? Or is there ever a legitimate reason for a native recipe to have a dependency on MACHINE_FEATURES? -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list