I'm trying to understand the logic behind the uclibc recipes, it seems
it is using fairly random points in history of git master and not the
0.9.33 point releases that have been made.
What is the logic behind that and why not use the upstream release
builds as a starting point?
Thanks,
Brendan
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Brendan Le Foll
brendan.le.f...@intel.com wrote:
I'm trying to understand the logic behind the uclibc recipes, it seems
it is using fairly random points in history of git master and not the
0.9.33 point releases that have been made.
What is the logic behind
Hi Khem,
what I want to build is the meta-toolchain (uclibc) and looking at the
build I can see system tries to build also eglibc packages.
Maybe I'm wrong in something.
Welcome advice.
BR,
Giuseppe
2012/10/26 Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com
Why do you want uClibc for narivesdk ? Do you have a
On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 09:48 +0100, Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
Hi Khem,
what I want to build is the meta-toolchain (uclibc) and looking at the
build I can see system tries to build also eglibc packages.
Maybe I'm wrong in something.
Welcome advice.
So that the toolchain can be used on many
Hi All,
I need to build sdk using uclibc.
I'm failing on nativesdk-libc-for-gcc dependence because
system always finds nativesdk-eglibc as the correct one.
I've set TCLIBC to uclibc and in fact (builind with -DDD) I can
say the default nativesdk is the uclibc, although the eglibc part
will be
Why do you want uClibc for narivesdk ? Do you have a build system also
running uclibc
On Friday, October 26, 2012, Giuseppe Condorelli
giuseppe.condore...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I need to build sdk using uclibc.
I'm failing on nativesdk-libc-for-gcc dependence because
system always finds
Hi,
I have experienced some issues building external code using an oe-core
built SDK. I can get code to compile fine but when linking it
complains about missing libpthread_nonshared.a or uclibc_nonshared.a.
Neither library is included in the SDK directory. I noticed that
uclibc.inc
attempts to
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Mark Norman mpnor...@gmail.com wrote:
--- a/meta/recipes-core/uclibc/uclibc.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-core/uclibc/uclibc.inc
@@ -48,9 +48,7 @@ RDEPENDS_${PN}-dev = linux-libc-headers-dev
INHIBIT_DEFAULT_DEPS = 1
-PACKAGES =+ ldd uclibc-utils-dbg uclibc-utils
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Ambrose, Martin mar...@ti.com wrote:
Hello.
My goal is to get a baseline uClibc image for an arm architecture.
I've tried various mechanisms but eventually end up with build/run-time
errors.
First attempt was to only use oe-core and specify the following in
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:14:54PM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Ambrose, Martin mar...@ti.com wrote:
Hello.
My goal is to get a baseline uClibc image for an arm architecture.
I've tried various mechanisms but eventually end up with build/run-time
errors.
Hello.
My goal is to get a baseline uClibc image for an arm architecture.
I've tried various mechanisms but eventually end up with build/run-time errors.
First attempt was to only use oe-core and specify the following in local.conf
TCLIBC = uclibc
USE_NLS = no
USE_NLS_glib-2.0 = no
On (16/05/11 21:11), Phil Blundell wrote:
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 10:01 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Phil Blundell p...@pbcl.net wrote:
I've just been trying to build a uclibc-based system from the current
head of oe-core but this doesn't seem to be something that
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 10:01 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Phil Blundell p...@pbcl.net wrote:
I've just been trying to build a uclibc-based system from the current
head of oe-core but this doesn't seem to be something that works
entirely smoothly at the moment.
13 matches
Mail list logo
