On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
The previous 5.7 release was relatively close to 5.8 due to it bringing
in a patch to sync with upstream work-in-progress. We skip over the
5.8 release and move to 5.9.
there already are patches for 5.9 available too
Op 5 apr 2011, om 23:48 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven:
From: Dongxiao Xu dongxiao...@intel.com
Add libgstsouphttpsrc library to support remote stream playing via
http/https protocols.
This solves the mp4 playing issue by regel from mediatomb file server.
Signed-off-by:
Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org writes:
One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule is multilib and we need a plan
of implementation. I've been thinking about this for a while and at
least have some ideas how some of the issues can be handled.
Does this make sense to
Op 5 apr 2011, om 13:02 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule is multilib and we need a plan
of implementation. I've been thinking about this for a while and at
least have some ideas how some of the issues can be handled.
In case anyone
2011/4/5 Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org:
[...]
Does this make sense to everyone, are there any questions/ objections/
concerns/ things I've missed?
I think most embedded systems would only use one lib. To take your
lib/lib64 example:
If I am developing for an embedded
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 10:03 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Joshua Lock j...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 18:58 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
On 4/1/2011 6:51 AM, Joshua Lock wrote:
From: Joshua Lockj...@linux.intel.com
gcc 4.6 (as used in Fedora 15)
From: Joshua Lock j...@linux.intel.com
Unfortunately I'm currently unable to test this on a machine with GCC version
other than 4.6 but thought it was worth getting this patch out there as I'll
be in the air and travelling until next week.
Pull URL:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 09:08 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org writes:
One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule is multilib and we need a plan
of implementation. I've been thinking about this for a while and at
least have some ideas how some
Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org writes:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 09:08 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org writes:
One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule is multilib and we need a plan
of implementation. I've been thinking
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 14:16 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org writes:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 09:08 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org writes:
One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule is multilib
Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org writes:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 14:16 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org writes:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 09:08 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org writes:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 15:21 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org writes:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 14:16 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
I actually believe the core in OE is well suited to multilib support and
using it will show off some of the power
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 10:47 +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
I think most embedded systems would only use one lib. To take your
lib/lib64 example:
If I am developing for an embedded system I know whether it will run
as 32 or 64 bit, so there is no need to have both.
I agree that this is the
On 04/05/2011 11:18 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
The previous 5.7 release was relatively close to 5.8 due to it bringing
in a patch to sync with upstream work-in-progress. We skip over the
5.8 release and move to 5.9.
there
From: Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com
Move Qt 4.7.x from 4.7.1 to 4.7.2 and apply security patch from OE.
Pull URL: git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib
Branch: paule/qt-4.7.2
Browse:
From: Denys Dmytriyenko de...@ti.com
Security advisory: Blacklist fraudulent certificates. More info is in the
patch and at the following links:
http://www.comodo.com/Comodo-Fraud-Incident-2011-03-23.html
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 12:10 +0100, Joshua Lock wrote:
From: Joshua Lock j...@linux.intel.com
Unfortunately I'm currently unable to test this on a machine with GCC version
other than 4.6 but thought it was worth getting this patch out there as I'll
be in the air and travelling until next
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 14:47 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
From: Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com
Richard,
Here are a half dozen pull requests for oe-core and poky.
Thanks
Sau!
Pull URL: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib.git
Branch: distro/oe-core
Browse:
Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org writes:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 15:21 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org writes:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 14:16 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
I actually believe the core in OE is well suited to
Op 6 apr 2011, om 16:57 heeft Paul Eggleton het volgende geschreven:
From: Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com
Move Qt 4.7.x from 4.7.1 to 4.7.2 and apply security patch from OE.
Pull URL: git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib
Branch: paule/qt-4.7.2
Browse:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/05/2011 11:18 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
The previous 5.7 release was relatively close to 5.8 due to it bringing
in a patch to sync with upstream
On 04/06/2011 10:05 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/05/2011 11:18 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
The previous 5.7 release was relatively close to 5.8 due to it bringing
in a
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/06/2011 10:05 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/05/2011 11:18 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
The
On 04/06/2011 10:26 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/06/2011 10:05 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/05/2011 11:18 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Tom
On Apr 6, 2011, at 7:29 AM, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 10:47 +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
I think most embedded systems would only use one lib. To take your
lib/lib64 example:
If I am developing for an embedded system I know whether
On 04/06/2011 01:47 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
2011/4/5 Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org:
[...]
Does this make sense to everyone, are there any questions/ objections/
concerns/ things I've missed?
I think most embedded systems would only use one lib. To take your
A few comments to the original proposal below...
On Apr 5, 2011, at 2:24 PM, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule is multilib and we need a plan
of implementation. I've been thinking about this for a while and at
least have some
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/06/2011 10:26 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/06/2011 10:05 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On
On 04/06/2011 11:27 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/06/2011 10:26 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/06/2011 10:05 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Tom
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/06/2011 11:27 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/06/2011 10:26 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On
On 04/06/2011 11:26 AM, Hatle, Mark wrote:
A few comments to the original proposal below...
On Apr 5, 2011, at 2:24 PM, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
[snip]
and all the multilib class would need to do is to manipulation of
variables including OVERRIDES in a
On 04/06/2011 11:32 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/06/2011 11:27 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/06/2011 10:26 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:10 AM,
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 09:11 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 5 apr 2011, om 23:48 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven:
From: Dongxiao Xu dongxiao...@intel.com
Add libgstsouphttpsrc library to support remote stream playing via
http/https protocols.
This solves the mp4 playing issue
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 23:18 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
The previous 5.7 release was relatively close to 5.8 due to it bringing
in a patch to sync with upstream work-in-progress. We skip over the
5.8 release and move to 5.9.
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 16:28 -0700, Jeremy Puhlman wrote:
To do this I'm thinking of a new set of include files of the form
conf/machine/include/multilib-.inc, similar in nature to the
tune-xxx.inc files. A given setup would include each of the multilibs it
requred. Each multilib
On 04/06/2011 11:38 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 23:18 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
The previous 5.7 release was relatively close to 5.8 due to it bringing
in a patch to sync with upstream work-in-progress. We
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 15:57 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
From: Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com
Move Qt 4.7.x from 4.7.1 to 4.7.2 and apply security patch from OE.
Pull URL: git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib
Branch: paule/qt-4.7.2
Browse:
Op 6 apr. 2011 om 20:31 heeft Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org het volgende geschreven:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 09:11 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 5 apr 2011, om 23:48 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven:
From: Dongxiao Xu dongxiao...@intel.com
Add libgstsouphttpsrc
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 23:18 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
The previous 5.7 release was relatively close to 5.8 due to it bringing
in a patch
Hatle, Mark mark.ha...@windriver.com writes:
On Apr 6, 2011, at 5:06 AM, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 09:08 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org writes:
One of the items on our post 1.0 schedule
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/06/2011 11:32 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/06/2011 11:27 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On
On 04/06/2011 07:57 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
From: Paul Eggletonpaul.eggle...@linux.intel.com
Move Qt 4.7.x from 4.7.1 to 4.7.2 and apply security patch from OE.
Paul could you please create or update the distro_tracking_fields.inc
file. Entries are needed for each recipe that has a distinct
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 10:35 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
On 04/06/2011 10:26 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/06/2011 10:05 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/05/2011 11:18
On 04/06/2011 02:16 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 10:35 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
On 04/06/2011 10:26 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 04/06/2011 10:05 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Tom Rini
This updates ncurses to 5.9. While less of a deal for oe-core where we
had the patch we applied on top of 5.7 mirrored and referenced that
openembedded.master did not and the patch recently went away. Fortunately
there's now a 5.8 and 5.9 release of ncurses and our 5.7 + patch was
close to 5.8
The previous 5.7 release was relatively close to 5.8 due to it bringing
in a patch to sync with upstream work-in-progress. We skip over the
5.8 release and move to 5.9. Also, we move most of the contents of the
main recipe into the previously unused ncurses.inc file.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini
46 matches
Mail list logo
