Re: [OE-core] The future of qemuarm

2016-10-17 Thread Khem Raj
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Aníbal Limón wrote: > > > On 10/17/2016 10:20 AM, Pascal Bach wrote: >> >>> >>> Whatever we replace it with has to be part of linux-yocto and the meta data >>> that is >>> carried there, so it can be used for the sanity/smoke test

Re: [OE-core] The future of qemuarm

2016-10-17 Thread Aníbal Limón
On 10/17/2016 10:20 AM, Pascal Bach wrote: > >> >> Whatever we replace it with has to be part of linux-yocto and the meta data >> that is >> carried there, so it can be used for the sanity/smoke test machine for arch >> arm. >> >> As such, it has to be feature compatible (network

Re: [OE-core] The future of qemuarm

2016-10-17 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Pascal Bach wrote: > > > > > Whatever we replace it with has to be part of linux-yocto and the meta > data that is > > carried there, so it can be used for the sanity/smoke test machine for > arch arm. > > > > As such, it has to be

Re: [OE-core] The future of qemuarm

2016-10-17 Thread Pascal Bach
> > Whatever we replace it with has to be part of linux-yocto and the meta data > that is > carried there, so it can be used for the sanity/smoke test machine for arch > arm. > > As such, it has to be feature compatible (network capabilities, disk boot, > etc) with > the existing arm versatile

Re: [OE-core] The future of qemuarm

2016-10-17 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 7:18 AM, Pascal Bach wrote: > Hi > > I read several discussions about lifting the default qemuarm target to > armv7 or higher. > On the mailinglist and on the internet I also found several mentions about > machines qemuarmv7 and qemuarma8, but I

Re: [OE-core] The future of qemuarm

2016-10-17 Thread Pascal Bach
> > Is the goal to increase the default to a higher arm version? > > Is there a bsp layer for other qemuarm variants (cortex-a8, ...)? > > > There is a qemuarm64 in master which is aarch64 based. > I'm aware of qemuarm64 but I was more talking about 32-bit arm. Pascal --

Re: [OE-core] The future of qemuarm

2016-10-17 Thread Burton, Ross
On 17 October 2016 at 12:18, Pascal Bach wrote: > I read several discussions about lifting the default qemuarm target to > armv7 or higher. > On the mailinglist and on the internet I also found several mentions about > machines qemuarmv7 and qemuarma8, but I didn't find

[OE-core] The future of qemuarm

2016-10-17 Thread Pascal Bach
Hi I read several discussions about lifting the default qemuarm target to armv7 or higher. On the mailinglist and on the internet I also found several mentions about machines qemuarmv7 and qemuarma8, but I didn't find any working machine configs for them. What are the planes here? Is the