It's autodetected and leads to sstate based breakage on autobuilders:
This ends up in the package:
Package: gnome-settings-daemon
Version: 2.32.1-r3
Depends: libltdl7 (= 2.4.2), hicolor-icon-theme, libjson0 (= 0.9), libxcb1
(= 1.8.1), libxrender1 (= 0.9.7), libpixman-1-0 (= 0.25.2), libxml2 (=
It's autodetected and leads to sstate based breakage on autobuilders:
This ends up in the package:
Package: gnome-session
Version: 2.32.1-r1
Depends: libx11-6 (= 1.4.4), hicolor-icon-theme, libxrender1 (= 0.9.7),
libdbus-1-3 (= 1.4.16), libdbus-glib-1-2 (= 0.98), gconf, libxtst6 (= 1.2.1),
But
It's autodetected and leads to sstate based breakage on autobuilders:
This ends up in the package:
Package: gnome-settings-daemon
Version: 2.32.1-r3
Depends: [..] libdbus-1-3 (= 1.4.16), libx11-6 (= 1.4.4), libogg0 (= 1.3.0),
libsndfile1 (= 1.0.25),
But libsndfile hasn't been built.
From: Jackie Huang jackie.hu...@windriver.com
lm_sensors: added recipe for v3.3.2
* Adapted from the recipe for v3.2.0
* Added MANDIR in EXTRA_OEMAKE instead of the moving operation for
manuals in do_install
* put .a files in _staticdev package
Signed-off-by: Jackie Huang
Hi All,
after having built my own image, I've looked at the resultant rpms under
the deploy directory and I saw
no relocation is possible (rpm -qpli package). This because Prefix is not
set during spec file creation
(package_rpm.bbclass).
As far as you know, is it possible to set Prefix somehow?
Dear All,
I have three intree recipes A, B and C which are part of the same layer.
= B depends on A
= C depends on A.
There is no dependency between B and C. Only important thing is that B
and C are not build simultaneously. This is not a problem unless I use
configure BB_NUMBER_THREADS 1. Than
On 2012-05-07 05:54, Radek Dostal wrote:
Dear All,
I have three intree recipes A, B and C which are part of the same layer.
= B depends on A
= C depends on A.
There is no dependency between B and C. Only important thing is that B
and C are not build simultaneously. This is not a problem
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 06:02 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-05-07 05:54, Radek Dostal wrote:
Dear All,
I have three intree recipes A, B and C which are part of the same layer.
= B depends on A
= C depends on A.
There is no dependency between B and C. Only important thing is that
On Monday, May 7, 2012, Radek Dostal r...@radekdostal.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 06:02 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-05-07 05:54, Radek Dostal wrote:
Dear All,
I have three intree recipes A, B and C which are part of the same
layer.
= B depends on A
= C depends on A.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com
---
.../recipes-support/libsoup/libsoup-2.4_2.37.2.bb | 25 --
.../use-usr-bin-env-for-python.patch | 20 ---
On 05/02/2012 02:54 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 02-05-12 19:45, Philip Balister schreef:
Linux containers are a lightweight virtualization system.
Compile tested on F15 and lightly run tested on a pandaboard.
Signed-off-by: Philip Balister phi...@balister.org ---
On 5/7/12 5:30 AM, Giuseppe Condorelli wrote:
Hi All,
after having built my own image, I've looked at the resultant rpms under
the deploy directory and I saw
no relocation is possible (rpm -qplipackage). This because Prefix is not
set during spec file creation
(package_rpm.bbclass).
As far as
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com
---
.../libgee/{libgee_0.6.0.bb = libgee_0.6.4.bb}| 11 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
rename meta-oe/recipes-devtools/libgee/{libgee_0.6.0.bb = libgee_0.6.4.bb}
(46%)
diff --git
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com
---
.../recipes-core/glib-2.0/glibmm/glib-2.32.patch | 10 ++
meta-oe/recipes-core/glib-2.0/glibmm_2.28.2.bb |7 +++
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
create mode 100644
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com
---
.../gpe-scap/gpe-scap/use.libsoup-2.4.patch| 42
meta-gpe/recipes-graphics/gpe-scap/gpe-scap_1.4.bb |8 ++-
2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
create mode 100644
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com
---
.../loudmouth/loudmouth-1.4.3/glib-2.32.patch | 10 ++
.../loudmouth/loudmouth_1.4.3.bb |5 -
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
create mode 100644
From: Christopher Larson kerg...@gmail.com
If KERNEL_IMAGETYPE is vmlinux, the expectation is most likely that there will
be no kernel image package, but we still want a vmlinux package for debugging,
so move kernel-vmlinux in front of kernel-image in PACKAGES.
Signed-off-by: Christopher Larson
From: Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com
---
meta-oe/classes/kernel.bbclass |7 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta-oe/classes/kernel.bbclass
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:17:02PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
From: Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com
This is needed in meta-oe because without module-init-tools in oe-core
we get failures like this:
ERROR: Nothing PROVIDES 'virtual/arm-oe-linux-gnueabi-depmod' (but
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com
---
meta-oe/classes/kernel.bbclass |2 +-
meta-oe/recipes-kernel/kmod/kmod_git.bb | 24
2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-kernel/kmod/kmod_git.bb
diff --git
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 12:59:51PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com
We should delete it only after issues reported on oe-core and here in
[meta-oe][meta-efl][meta-gpe][PATCH 7/7] kernel.bbclass
are resolved..
and that kernel.bbclass change seems wrong..
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 08:46 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
usually it crashes during ln -sf target dest which is executed
simultaneously with same parameters for both builds. There are other
issues as well in addition to this ln issue.
This is confusing why does this happen at all
Because ln
On 2012-05-07 15:01, Radek Dostal wrote:
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 08:46 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
usually it crashes during ln -sf target dest which is executed
simultaneously with same parameters for both builds. There are other
issues as well in addition to this ln issue.
This is confusing why
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 15:08 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote:
I think that your recipes are not well behaved - two recipes probably
should not be creating the same file in such a way.
Can you post the recipes, or at least the code snippets that break?
I agree usually it should not be a case, but
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Radek Dostal r...@radekdostal.com wrote:
Because ln -sf first do symlink(1) unlink(2) and symlink(3) again. In
case link is created by another process between 2 and 3 than ln fails.
It is quite well described here:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Radek Dostal r...@radekdostal.com wrote:
Because ln -sf first do symlink(1) unlink(2) and symlink(3) again. In
case link is created by another process between 2 and 3 than ln fails.
It is quite well described here:
* 1.0.9 fails with:
| XawIm.c:1410:23: error: cast from pointer to integer of different size
[-Werror=pointer-to-int-cast]
| XawIm.c:1415:23: error: cast from pointer to integer of different size
[-Werror=pointer-to-int-cast]
* fixed upstream:
Hallo list!
We have been accepted for a project booth at LinuxTag [1] again this year!
This means that we have a booth at the largest Linux fair in Europe and the
opportunity to get in touch with users, companies and other projects there.
LinuxTag takes place in Berlin, Germany from May 23 to
28 matches
Mail list logo
