Re: [oe] [OE-core] "sub" machine types?

2015-09-09 Thread Steffen Sledz
On 07.09.2015 16:24, Lee Nipper wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 7:08 AM, Steffen Sledz > wrote: > > On 07.09.2015 09:09, Steffen Sledz wrote: > > On 05.09.2015 13:29, Mike Looijmans wrote: > >> ... and I think the u-boot

Re: [oe] [OE-core] "sub" machine types?

2015-09-07 Thread Steffen Sledz
On 05.09.2015 13:29, Mike Looijmans wrote: > ... and I think the u-boot recipe recently learned to have multiple targets, > so you can build multiple bootloaders for a single machine too. That sounds great. Can someone give a pointer to some documentation or examples for that? -- DResearch

Re: [oe] [OE-core] "sub" machine types?

2015-09-07 Thread Steffen Sledz
On 07.09.2015 09:09, Steffen Sledz wrote: > On 05.09.2015 13:29, Mike Looijmans wrote: >> ... and I think the u-boot recipe recently learned to have multiple targets, >> so you can build multiple bootloaders for a single machine too. > > That sounds great. Can someone give a pointer to some

Re: [oe] [OE-core] "sub" machine types?

2015-09-05 Thread Mike Looijmans
On 04-09-15 09:35, Steffen Sledz wrote: We have some products which differ in bootloaders (u-boot) and kernel device trees only. They use the same kernel and root filesystem. Does OE have concepts for this? Or any suggestions to realize this without building for many machines? The way I

Re: [oe] [OE-core] "sub" machine types?

2015-09-05 Thread Steffen Sledz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 04.09.2015 um 09:45 schrieb Nicolas Dechesne: > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Steffen Sledz wrote: >> We have some products which differ in bootloaders (u-boot) and kernel device >> trees only. They use the same kernel