Re: [oe] [OE-core] [Openembedded-architecture] Removal of uclibc from oe-core?

On 18 July 2016 at 23:48, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > But do we need a sharpened stake to make sure it doesn't come back ? > I was hoping for agreement but wasn't expecting such a strong reaction :) I'll sent this patch shortly. Ross --

Re: [oe] [OE-core] [Openembedded-architecture] Removal of uclibc from oe-core?

> On Jul 18, 2016, at 3:48 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Phil Blundell > wrote: > On Mon, 2016-07-18 at 23:01 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > > > Now that musl is fairly mature I think it's

Re: [oe] [OE-core] [Openembedded-architecture] Removal of uclibc from oe-core?

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Mon, 2016-07-18 at 23:01 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > > > Now that musl is fairly mature I think it's time to take uclibc out to > > pasture, where the pasture is possibly called meta-uclibc. > > I think this is a splendid