On 5 September 2013 05:39, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote:
The meta-virt recipe had the same _1.0.bb extension, and it's SRCREV lines up
with the openflow-1.0.0 tag in the repository:
commit 5ccca75a69f99791659bcfbcf35353ab1921320a
Author: Glen Gibb g...@stanford.edu
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
On 5 September 2013 05:39, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com
wrote:
The meta-virt recipe had the same _1.0.bb extension, and it's SRCREV
lines up
with the openflow-1.0.0 tag in the repository:
[Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] openflow: Add latest from git] On 13.09.05
(Thu 00:39) Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Joe MacDonald j...@deserted.net wrote:
Actually, after all of that, I do have a couple of additional requests
(beyond just the tweak to the commit
[Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] openflow: Add latest from git] On 13.09.05
(Thu 10:01) Burton, Ross wrote:
On 5 September 2013 05:39, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote:
The meta-virt recipe had the same _1.0.bb extension, and it's SRCREV lines
up
with the openflow-1.0.0
the wrong version.
How about reviewing other pending changes for weeks like stunnel?
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Joe MacDonald j...@deserted.net wrote:
[Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] openflow: Add latest from git] On
13.09.05 (Thu 10:01) Burton, Ross wrote:
On 5 September 2013 05:39, Bruce
I'll just say that I was less connected than I expected to be over my
vacation and there's been considerable catching up to do.
[Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] openflow: Add latest from git] On
13.09.03 (Tue 09:38) Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Laszlo Papp
was less connected than I expected to be over my
vacation and there's been considerable catching up to do.
[Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] openflow: Add latest from git] On
13.09.03 (Tue 09:38) Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
IMO, most
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Philip Balister phi...@balister.org wrote:
snip
The same applies to anyone else working on a layer with clearly
networking components that may be reluctant to incorporate it into
meta-net. I'm welcoming submissions of useful components and I'd be
really
[Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] openflow: Add latest from git] On 13.09.04
(Wed 09:13) Philip Balister wrote:
On 09/03/2013 11:27 PM, Joe MacDonald wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Joe MacDonald j
[Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] openflow: Add latest from git] On 13.09.03
(Tue 17:18) Joe MacDonald wrote:
[Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] openflow: Add latest from git] On 13.09.03
(Tue 14:47) Laszlo Papp wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi
] [meta-networking][PATCH] openflow: Add latest from git] On 13.09.02 (Mon
09:20) Laszlo Papp wrote:
1) The version in meta-virtualization is quite old. It is basically from 2009,
and a lot of things has changed since then.
2) More importantly, this software is more like for networking rather
[Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] openflow: Add latest from git] On 13.09.04
(Wed 08:22) Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Joe MacDonald j...@deserted.net wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com
wrote:
...
- We run some
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Joe MacDonald j...@deserted.net wrote:
[Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] openflow: Add latest from git] On 13.09.04
(Wed 08:22) Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Joe MacDonald j...@deserted.net wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:39 PM
it in the past as I'm not a
subscriber and it's subscriber-only.
:) I can't blame you for that, I share the pain (after bouncing off of oe-devel
just a few days ago myself). Thanks for the cc.
[[oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] openflow: Add latest from git] On 13.09.02
(Mon 09:20) Laszlo Papp
-networking][PATCH] openflow: Add latest from git] On 13.09.02
(Mon 09:20) Laszlo Papp wrote:
1) The version in meta-virtualization is quite old. It is basically from
2009,
and a lot of things has changed since then.
2) More importantly, this software is more like for networking rather
than
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 11:55 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 4:20 AM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
1) The version in meta-virtualization is quite old. It is basically from
2009,
IMO, most of this email is red herring, and the main topic is a networking
specification should be in meta-networking. Why would I (or anyone for that
matter) need *any* virtualization layer when I am working on a network
device?
I am sorry for your historical misplacement, but it is not an
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
IMO, most of this email is red herring, and the main topic is a networking
specification should be in meta-networking. Why would I (or anyone for that
matter) need *any* virtualization layer when I am working on a network
device?
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
IMO, most of this email is red herring, and the main topic is a
networking
specification should be in meta-networking. Why would I (or anyone for
[Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] openflow: Add latest from git] On 13.09.03
(Tue 14:47) Laszlo Papp wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
IMO, most of this email
Little late coming to this party, I guess. Sorry all. In my defense
I'll just say that I was less connected than I expected to be over my
vacation and there's been considerable catching up to do.
[Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] openflow: Add latest from git] On 13.09.03
(Tue 09:38) Bruce
-networking][PATCH] openflow: Add latest from git] On 13.09.03
(Tue 09:38) Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
IMO, most of this email is red herring, and the main topic is a networking
specification should be in meta-networking. Why would I
vacation and there's been considerable catching up to do.
[Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] openflow: Add latest from git] On
13.09.03 (Tue 09:38) Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
IMO, most of this email is red herring
1) The version in meta-virtualization is quite old. It is basically from 2009,
and a lot of things has changed since then.
2) More importantly, this software is more like for networking rather than
virtualization, so I think it was misplaced.
---
.../recipes-support/openflow/openflow_1.0.bb
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 4:20 AM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
1) The version in meta-virtualization is quite old. It is basically from 2009,
and a lot of things has changed since then.
And that was on purpose, there are some tight bindings to SDN and hence why
it is in meta-virtualization,
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 4:20 AM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
1) The version in meta-virtualization is quite old. It is basically from
2009,
and a lot of things has changed since then.
And that was on
26 matches
Mail list logo
