Re: [oe] [OE-core] [oe-core] QEMU with ARM Cortex A9 with hard float configuration - Kernel panic

On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Elvis Dowson elvis.dow...@gmail.com wrote: HI Bruce, On Aug 29, 2013, at 10:58 PM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote: I have a vexpress A15 that works here as well, but I wouldn't mind comparing configs. If you send it along, I'd have a look

Re: [oe] [OE-core] [oe-core] QEMU with ARM Cortex A9 with hard float configuration - Kernel panic

On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Elvis Dowson elvis.dow...@gmail.com wrote: On Aug 29, 2013, at 11:24 PM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote: I mean either you don't publish anything that Wind River chooses to keep proprietary or support the machine configurations defined

Re: [oe] Adding support for additional qemu machine configurations

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Elvis Dowson elvis.dow...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'd like to put forward a proposal for adding support for additional qemu machine configurations, either by way of creating a new meta-qemu layer, or adding additional machine configurations to the oe-core,

Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] openflow: Add latest from git

On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 4:20 AM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: 1) The version in meta-virtualization is quite old. It is basically from 2009, and a lot of things has changed since then. And that was on purpose, there are some tight bindings to SDN and hence why it is in meta-virtualization,

Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] openflow: Add latest from git

On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 11:55 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@gmail.comwrote: On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 4:20 AM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: 1) The version in meta-virtualization is quite old. It is basically from 2009

Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] openflow: Add latest from git

. if there are multiple users of the recipe, maybe see about getting it into oe-core, etc. But I see that isn't on the menu today. I'll ping Joe and we'll see what we can figure out as timing for a path forward. Cheers, Bruce On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@gmail.comwrote

Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] openflow: Add latest from git

-networking][PATCH] openflow: Add latest from git] On 13.09.03 (Tue 09:38) Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: IMO, most of this email is red herring, and the main topic is a networking specification should be in meta-networking. Why would I

Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] openflow: Add latest from git

On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Joe MacDonald j...@deserted.net wrote: On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Joe MacDonald j...@deserted.net wrote: Little late coming to this party, I guess. Sorry all. In my defense

Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] openflow: Add latest from git

On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Joe MacDonald j...@deserted.net wrote: [Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] openflow: Add latest from git] On 13.09.04 (Wed 08:22) Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Joe MacDonald j...@deserted.net wrote: On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:39 PM

Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] openflow: Add latest from git

On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Joe MacDonald j...@deserted.net wrote: Actually, after all of that, I do have a couple of additional requests (beyond just the tweak to the commit log). Explicitly cc:ing Bruce here since I'm intentionally not adding meta-virt@. I've gotten bounced from

Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] openflow: import and tweak

, since I replied from my non-subscribed account a few minutes ago Awesome. I was just wondering about this a few days ago. I'll push a removal of the meta-virt recipe, once this has merged to meta-networking. Acked-by: Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com Signed-off-by: Joe

Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] openflow: import and tweak

in a few days. I took that at confirmation that you were no longer pursuing this. Absolutely no slight was intended. 'nor here with my Ack of Joe's work. I was just waiting in the background as well. Cheers, Bruce -J. On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi

Re: [oe] [meta-virtualization] [PATCH 1/2] conf/layer.conf: fix No newline at end of file

FYI: this should go to meta-virtualizat...@yoctoproject.org, but I can pick up the patch from here. Cheers, Bruce On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 4:22 AM, Robert Yang liezhi.y...@windriver.com wrote: The last line lacked a newline (usually '\n', aka CR or CRLF) in the end, so there was a warning from

[oe] [meta-networking][PATCH 1/2] dnsmasq: uprev to 2.6.3

of PRSERVER functionality - dhcp_release is added to the default build, since it is used in the cleanup phase for virtual machines. Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com --- meta-networking/recipes-support/dnsmasq/dnsmasq.inc | 8 meta-networking/recipes

[oe] [meta-networking][PATCH 0/2]: meta-virtualization derived updates

of updating them for submission to meta-networking, and documented the tweaks in the patches themselves. Anyway, have a look, and let me know what additional changes you'd like made to the recipes. Cheers, Bruce Bruce Ashfield (2): dnsmasq: uprev to 2.6.3 netcf: move from meta-virtualization

[oe] [meta-networking][PATCH 2/2] netcf: move from meta-virtualization to meta-networking

netcf was orginally introduced in meta-virtualization, since it provides functionality required by libvirt, but it is otherwise not bound to virtualization. So we can move it to meta-networking, and in the process uprev to the the latest 0.2.3 functinality. Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield

[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] python-greenlet: uprev to 0.4.1

During runtime testing of meta-cloud-services several python scripts were continunously segfaulting the interpreter. corefiles and gdb pointed at the greenlet implementation. Moving to 0.4.1 fixed the segfaults, and showed no regressions. Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi

[oe] [PATCH] python-greenlet: uprev to 0.4.1

During runtime testing of meta-cloud-services several python scripts were continunously segfaulting the interpreter. corefiles and gdb pointed at the greenlet implementation. Moving to 0.4.1 fixed the segfaults, and showed no regressions. Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi

Re: [oe] [PATCH] iscsi-initiator-utils: add recipe file

On 2014-09-24, 4:02 AM, Rongqing Li wrote: On 09/24/2014 03:37 PM, Rongqing Li wrote: I see there are two recipes for iscsi under meta-cloud-service, one is called iscsi-initiator-utils, other is called open-iscsi. and open-iscsi provides the systemd support and kernel modules, so I will

Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] Add netcat-openbsd for virtualization (libvirt virt-test)

On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Joe MacDonald joe.macdon...@windriver.comwrote: [[meta-networking][PATCH] Add netcat-openbsd for virtualization (libvirt virt-test)] On 13.01.06 (Sun 13:17) lei.y...@windriver.com wrote: From: Lei Yang lei.y...@windriver.com The netcat-openbsd in

Re: [oe] [meta-handheld] linux-yocto-3.8 failing

On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Andrea, patches from http://git.openembedded.org/meta-handheld/commit/?id=54c01286d738e6a6dc2971853644b9ed0e0a9a2e don't apply after linux-yocto upgrade in oe-core from today

Re: [oe] [meta-handheld] linux-yocto-3.8 failing

On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 08:44:53PM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Andrea, patches from http://git.openembedded.org/meta-handheld/commit

Re: [oe] [meta-handheld] linux-yocto-3.8 failing

On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 08:44:53PM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com

Re: [oe] [meta-handheld] linux-yocto-3.8 failing

On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:59:35PM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com

Re: [oe] [meta-handheld] linux-yocto-3.8 failing

happening, the results of our previous debugging are in the tree now, so this could always just be the next layer :) Cheers, Bruce Cheers Andrea On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com

Re: [oe] [meta-handheld][PATCH 3/3] linux-yocto_3.8: unlock linux-yocto kernels 3.8 for Zaurus

On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Andrea Adami andrea.ad...@gmail.com wrote: * after removal of kernel 3.2 we are obliged to upgrade * note: testing needed * known issue: large size Work with me on this if you are still seeing odd behaviour. I'm out of the office for some travel this upcoming

Re: [oe] [meta-python][PATCH 3/4] python-msgpack: add recipe

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:42:49PM -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:09:09PM -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Wed

Re: [oe] [meta-python][PATCH 3/4] python-msgpack: add recipe

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Ben Shelton ben.shel...@ni.com wrote: python-msgpack implements the MessagePack binary serialization format for Python. Copied from commit 91ed2353847d4121e3dd8ad10ca0c24194ac9765 in meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack and updated to version 0.4.5. Can you

Re: [oe] [meta-python][PATCH 4/4] python-requests: add recipe

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Ben Shelton ben.shel...@ni.com wrote: Requests is an HTTP library for Python with a clean and succinct API. Copied from commit bc572006bfcec10523658b8675f30bf45b43a998 in meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack and updated to version 2.5.1. When you do this .. you

Re: [oe] [meta-python][PATCH 3/4] python-msgpack: add recipe

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:09:09PM -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Ben Shelton ben.shel...@ni.com wrote: python-msgpack implements the MessagePack binary serialization format for Python

Re: [oe] [OE-core] What is expected of a kernel recipe nowadays?

On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 6:33 AM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote: On 6 January 2015 at 11:04, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote: | make: *** No rule to make target `oldconfig'. Stop. | ERROR: oe_runmake failed | WARNING: exit code 1 from a shell command. | ERROR:

Re: [oe] [OE-core] kernel.bbclass: Fix do_shared_workdir task ordering

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Jens Rehsack <rehs...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Am 11.11.2015 um 03:01 schrieb Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com>: >> >> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Jens Rehsack <rehs...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>>

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, test-dependencies 2015-11-12

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 10:57:39AM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:43:11PM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: >> > Another incremental test, only 26 recipes were tested, but it found enough >> >

Re: [oe] [OE-core] kernel.bbclass: Fix do_shared_workdir task ordering

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Jens Rehsack <rehs...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Am 11.11.2015 um 13:49 schrieb Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com>: >> >> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Jens Rehsack <rehs...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>>

Re: [oe] [OE-core] kernel.bbclass: Fix do_shared_workdir task ordering

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Jens Rehsack <rehs...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Am 14.10.2015 um 21:48 schrieb Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com>: >> >> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:30 PM, S. Lockwood-Childs <s...@vctlabs.com> wrote: >>&g

Re: [oe] [OE-core] kernel.bbclass: Fix do_shared_workdir task ordering

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:30 PM, S. Lockwood-Childs wrote: > http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/99875/ > > Apparently this patch is still not in master, and I just ran across the > problem with an externally built module (omaplfb from omap3-sgx-modules) > in meta-ti layer.

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2016-01-09, full QA report

On 16-01-15 03:13 AM, Andrea Adami wrote: On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: qemuarm was using slightly older metadata, that's why it shows more failures. Reexecuting qemuarm build shows only one failure: Summary: 1 task failed:

Re: [oe] [OE-core] linux-yocto issues Was: [meta-oe][PATCH] efivar: fix zero initializer compiler error

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 5:45 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 11:24:03AM +0200, Alexandru But wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 07:01:57PM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 12:45:18PM +0200, Alexandru But wrote: > > > > Patch based

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2016-03-09

On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Mark Hatle wrote: > On 3/10/16 5:53 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > Aggressive PNBLACKLISTing continues. But linux-yocto (and modules > depending on it) > > are still broken :/. > > > > I'll look at cef3 and chromium issue, my recent patch

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2016-03-09

On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:52:14AM -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Mark Hatle <mark.ha...@windriver.com> > > wrote: > > > > &

Re: [oe] [PATCH][meta-oe] virt-what: add the recipe

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 4:22 AM, wrote: > From: Roy Li > > virt-what is a a shell script which can be used to detect if the program > is running in a virtual machine. > Did you consider meta-virtualization for this ? not a big concern ..

Re: [oe] [PATCH 1/2] protobuf: add protobuf-c recipe

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 4:02 AM, Felipe Ferreri Tonello < e...@felipetonello.com> wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > On 20/04/16 15:32, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 4:32 AM, Felipe Ferreri Tonello < > > e...@felipetonello.com> wrote: > > > >&

Re: [oe] [PATCH 1/2] protobuf: add protobuf-c recipe

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Felipe F. Tonello wrote: > Initial version of recipe. The main package could be split into two to > separate the compiler. This also applies to protobuf recipe. > > More precisely, this is the initial version outside of

Re: [oe] [PATCH 1/2] protobuf: add protobuf-c recipe

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Felipe F. Tonello <e...@felipetonello.com> > wrote: > >> Initial version of recipe. The main package could be split into two to >> s

Re: [oe] [PATCH 1/2] protobuf: add protobuf-c recipe

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 4:32 AM, Felipe Ferreri Tonello < e...@felipetonello.com> wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > On 19/04/16 20:55, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Bruce Ashfield < > bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > >

Re: [oe] [OE-core] [Openembedded-architecture] Removal of uclibc from oe-core?

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Mon, 2016-07-18 at 23:01 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > > > Now that musl is fairly mature I think it's time to take uclibc out to > > pasture, where the pasture is possibly called meta-uclibc. > > I think this is a splendid

Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH 2/2] dnsmasq: disable the service by default

it makes more sense. > > > > Thanks, > > Jackie > > > > *From:* Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Monday, February 27, 2017 10:39 PM > *To:* Huang, Jie (Jackie) > *Cc:* openembedded-devel > *Subject:* Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH 2/2]

Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH 2/2] dnsmasq: disable the service by default

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:09 AM, wrote: > From: Jackie Huang > > The service will fail to start/stop when dnsmasq and > bind (provides named) are both installed since they > are using the same port 53: > > | dnsmasq: failed to create

[oe] [meta-filesystems][PATCH] aufs-utils-native: define CC

lready passed through. Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com> --- meta-filesystems/recipes-utils/aufs-util/aufs-util_git.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta-filesystems/recipes-utils/aufs-util/aufs-util_git.bb b/meta-file

Re: [oe] [OE-core] [RFT] gcc7 and glibc-2.26 recipes

On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 8:30 PM, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> > wrote: > >> On 16 April 2017 at 16:50, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >

Re: [oe] [OE-core] [RFT] gcc7 and glibc-2.26 recipes

On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 16 April 2017 at 16:50, Khem Raj wrote: > > > I have put together recipes for upcoming gcc-7 major release as well > > as glibc 2.26 release, which we would target for next release ( 2.4 ) > > >

Re: [oe] [OE-core] [RFT] gcc7 and glibc-2.26 recipes

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 24 April 2017 at 11:29, Burton, Ross wrote: > >> I'm getting that with 4.9.15 from meta-intel, should I be telling Saul to >> update the BSP with some fixes you've made? >> > > Or ideally

Re: [oe] [OE-core] [RFT] gcc7 and glibc-2.26 recipes

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 6:29 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> wrote: > > On 24 April 2017 at 01:31, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I wasn't able to bring up the linux-yocto one .. but the 4.10 linux Yocto >>> should be at a

Re: [oe] [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-08-24

On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > Issues in meta-qt5 caused by security_flags.inc were fixed in this round, for > next round I'll test fixed 5.9.0 upgrade and then final 5.9.2 upgrade. > > > Thanks for fixes for QA issues, few more are included in

[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] vboxguestdrivers: update to fix build issues with 4.12+

ror: undefined named operand 'new' | tmp/work-shared/qemux86-64/kernel-source/arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h:192:2: error: undefined named operand 'new' Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com> --- .../{vboxguestdrivers_5.1.18.bb => vboxguestdrivers_5.1.26.bb}| 4

[oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] wireguard: fix kernel 4.12 build issues

0.20170810-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: /usr/bin/wg-quick contained in package wireguard-tools requires /bin/bash, but no providers found in RDEPENDS_wireguard-tools? [file-rdeps] Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com> --- ...eguard-module_0.0.20170517.bb => wiregua

Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] vboxguestdrivers: update to fix build issues with 4.12+

On 08/29/2017 01:07 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 8:09 PM, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com> wrote: Bumping the version to 5.1.26 fixes the build issues with the 4.12+ kernel (and headers). i.e.: tmp/work-shared/qemux86-64/kernel-source/arch/x86/inclu

Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] wireguard: fix kernel 4.12 build issues

On 08/29/2017 01:06 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 8:38 PM, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com> wrote: We upgrade the module + tools recipes to fix the following build error: wireguard-module/0.0.20170517-r0/WireGuard-0.0.20170517/src/device.c: In function

Re: [oe] [OE-core] Yocto vrs K.O kernel, wireguard go Boom

On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 4:57 PM, akuster808 <akuster...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 01/08/2018 08:01 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:08 AM, akuster808 <akuster...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Wireguard in met

Re: [oe] [OE-core] Yocto vrs K.O kernel, wireguard go Boom

On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:08 AM, akuster808 wrote: > Hello, > > Wireguard in meta-networking is failing do to compat.h issues on newer > kernels. I have updated the package and it fixed my problem on 4.14 K.O > kernel. Now I build it with the Yocko 4.12 and it fails. It

Re: [oe] Splitting meta-oe?

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2/20/18 9:13 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:50 AM, akuster808 <akuster...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 02/20/2018 02:45 AM, Burton, Ross wrot

Re: [oe] Splitting meta-oe?

it is a valid concern .. whether or not others agree. Cheers, Bruce > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 1:51 AM, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On 2/20/18 9:13 AM, Bruce

Re: [oe] Splitting meta-oe?

d. I was just probing to see if anyone had ideas on how that could be managed by infrastructure, versus me mucking about. Maybe RP's thoughts on layer tooling or setup possibilities would help, but either way, I'll keep chugging along :D Cheers, Bruce > > -J. > >> >> On Wed,

Re: [oe] Splitting meta-oe?

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:50 AM, akuster808 wrote: > > > On 02/20/2018 02:45 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Is now a good time to talk about splitting up meta-oe? Some layers are >> actively developed and maintained (one example: meta-python), others are >> basically

Re: [oe] Splitting meta-oe?

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:34 AM, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 3:49 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I need an updated python- package for an unrelated package >> >> And how far will you go?

Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] tgt: Migrate recipe from meta-openstack layer

On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 11:44 PM, Yu, Mingli wrote: > > > On 2018年07月14日 02:47, Khem Raj wrote: >> >> On 7/13/18 12:35 PM, Jagadeesh Krishnanjanappa wrote: >>> >>> Yes, we need to copy libconfig-general-perl recipe (from meta-openstack) >>> to >>> meta-networking as well. >>> >>> Bruce comment:

Re: [oe] [PATCH] fix license from Apache-2.0 to MIT

On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 9:15 PM, akuster808 wrote: > > > On 07/05/2018 11:26 PM, Takuma Ueba wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Takuma Ueba >> --- >> meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python-asn1crypto.inc | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git

Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] tgt: Migrate recipe from meta-openstack layer

On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 4:54 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 1:25 PM, Jagadeesh Krishnanjanappa > wrote: >> As iscsitarget cannot be built with Linux kernel >= 4.14, so >> migrate Linux SCSI target framework (tgt) recipe from meta-openstack >> la

Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] tgt: Migrate recipe from meta-openstack layer

On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 1:25 PM, Jagadeesh Krishnanjanappa wrote: > As iscsitarget cannot be built with Linux kernel >= 4.14, so > migrate Linux SCSI target framework (tgt) recipe from meta-openstack > layer; to allow users to test iSCSI target feature with tgt in > meta-networking layer. What

Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH][master][sumo] iscsitarget: Remove recipe as it is no longer supported to build with linux kernel >= 4.14

On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 9:10 PM, akuster808 wrote: > > > On 07/06/2018 10:33 AM, Jagadeesh Krishnanjanappa wrote: >> The upstream iscsitarget source does not have support to build >> with Linux kernel >= 4.14, as the "struct bio" members has been updated >> in the linux kernel v4.14 source.

Re: [oe] [meta-virtualization] runc update ftbfs on arm64

On 2018-04-04 5:18 AM, Fathi Boudra wrote: Hi Bruce, This commit https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-virtualization/commit/?id=e3d960f4fcd91a84067fbbd6293ce271e74a7740 caused a build failure on arm64:

Re: [oe] [meta-virtualization] runc update ftbfs on arm64

On 04/04/2018 05:18 AM, Fathi Boudra wrote: Hi Bruce, This commit https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-virtualization/commit/?id=e3d960f4fcd91a84067fbbd6293ce271e74a7740 caused a build failure on arm64:

Re: [oe] meta-bsp

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:30 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote: > Hi, > > I'm tempted to reply to RP's "2.6 planning proposals and meeting" email > thread > to ask if there could be some support added for common BSP things, but I > have > a feeling it probably won't go down well.

Re: [oe] Splitting meta-oe?

On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 1:44 PM, akuster808 wrote: > > > On 03/01/2018 01:04 AM, Alexander Kanavin wrote: >> On 03/01/2018 03:17 AM, akuster808 wrote: >>> We had/have a situation with the Yocto 4.12 kernel that broke wireguard >>> in meta-networking. Their are two patches

Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH V2 2/2] ebtables: Fix duplicate definition errors due to netinet/ether.h

FYI: I'm also about to spin a new linux-libc-headers that addresses this issue as well. There's a -stable patch that fixes the regression introduced in 4.15 headers, so I've bumped to 4.15.7 to pick up that fix. I also had to adjust the musl libc-headers patches for it slightly, but after those

Re: [oe] [sumo] [meta-virtualization] [PATCH v1] docker: CVE-2018-10892

Wrong list. This needs to go to the meta-virtualization mailing list. Bruce On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 11:48 PM Sinan Kaya wrote: > > * CVE-2018-10892 > Docker does not block /proc/acpi pathnames. The flaw allows an attacker to > modify host's hardware like enabling/disabling Bluetooth or turning

Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] lvm2: Update source location

This was already sent yesterday: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] lvm2: update SRC_URI Cheers, Bruce On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 8:50 AM Hugues Kamba wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Hugues Kamba > --- > meta-oe/recipes-support/lvm2/lvm2.inc | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git

Re: [oe] [meta-virtualization] [meta-virt][m-c-s][v2][PATCH 1/1] libibverbs: do not try to build for arm 32 bit or any mips

Thanks Joe. v2 is now merged. Bruce On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 5:23 PM Joe Slater wrote: > > arch.h does not contain macros for 32 bit arm or any mips arch. > > Signed-off-by: Joe Slater > --- > recipes-extended/libibverbs/libibverbs_1.2.1.bb | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff

Re: [oe] [meta-realtime][PATCH] layer.conf: add openembedded-layer to LAYERDEPENDS

Indeed. If khem hadn't followed up, I wouldn't have seen this at all. I have grabbed the patch and merged it, but in the future, the linux-yocto list is the one we are (re)using for the realtime stuff. Bruce On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 11:31 AM Khem Raj wrote: > > please send this to

Re: [oe] [meta-networking][RFC PATCH 0/1] Failed to compile networkmanager with musl

On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 12:27 AM Khem Raj wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:43 PM wrote: > > > > From: Kai Kang > > > > Hi Khem, > > > > I am updating networkmanager to 1.20. But I meet a problem with musl > > that "error: redefinition of 'struct ethhdr'". I find a patch for kernel > > which

[oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] dnsmasq: fix build against 5.2 headers

From: Bruce Ashfield Upstream linux y2038 work has moved some definitions SIOCGSTAMP is defined in linux/sockios.h, not asm/sockios.h now. So we need to add that include to fix the build. Upstream-status: backport of http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit;h

Re: [oe] [meta-filesystems][PATCH] ostree: import from meta-overc

On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 3:05 AM wrote: > > From: Mingli Yu This doesn't make any sense to "import from meta-overc". meta-overc, was never the authoritative upstream for ostree. That layer has to carry a specific version to meet the requirements of some of the container libraries, etc, that it

Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] libseccomp: import from meta-security

On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 3:06 AM wrote: > > From: Mingli Yu Can you share some details as to why this should be pulled from meta-security into a different repo ? It seems to fit the mandate of meta-security quite nicely ;) Is there some sort of dependency issue, or other technical problem that

Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] libseccomp: import from meta-security

On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 10:28 PM Yu, Mingli wrote: > > > On 2019年07月25日 21:45, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 3:06 AM wrote: > >> > >> From: Mingli Yu > > > > Can you share some details as to why this should be pulled

Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] libseccomp: import from meta-security

On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 11:01 PM Yu, Mingli wrote: > > > > On 2019年07月26日 10:46, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 10:28 PM Yu, Mingli > <mailto:mingli...@windriver.com>> wrote: > > > > > > > > On

Re: [oe] Kernel 5.3 fails to compile No rules to make zImage

On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 7:22 AM JH wrote: > > Hi, > > I am building kernel 5.3 on imx6 but failed in do_compile, is anyone > able to compile kernel 5.3? I don't build for the im6, but linux-yocto-dev has been building and booting for v5.3 throughout the entire -rc and release cycle for that

Re: [oe] Kernel 5.3 fails to compile No rules to make zImage

On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 8:07 AM JH wrote: > > Hi Bruce, > > On 10/1/19, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 7:22 AM JH wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I am building kernel 5.3 on imx6 but failed in do_compile, is anyone

Re: [oe] Tracking dependencies on kernel configration

On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 1:58 PM Maxim Sloyko via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > > Hi all, > > I hope this is the right mailing list for my question. > > Short version: my recipe (not kernel) depends on a certain option(s) > being set in the kernel built and certain devices enabled in the > device

Re: [oe] Tracking dependencies on kernel configration

On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 1:49 AM Khem Raj wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 7:27 PM Bruce Ashfield > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 4:21 PM Khem Raj wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 11:28 AM Bruce Ashfield > > > wrote: > > &

Re: [oe] [PATCH] menuconfig,mconf-cfg: Allow specification of ncurses location

On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 7:42 PM Scott Branden wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > On 2020-12-01 11:01 a.m., Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 12:19 PM Scott Branden > > wrote: > >> Hi Masahiro, > >> > >> On 2020-12-01 4:25 a.m., Masahiro Yam

Re: [oe] [PATCH] menuconfig,mconf-cfg: Allow specification of ncurses location

On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 12:19 PM Scott Branden wrote: > > Hi Masahiro, > > On 2020-12-01 4:25 a.m., Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 9:45 AM Scott Branden > > wrote: > >> From: Bruce Ashfield > >> > >> In some cross

Re: [oe] all external kernel modules fail to compile with with poky and linux 5.10-rc1

On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 6:57 PM Scott Branden via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > > It appears the all external modules fail to compile if you try using the > 5.10-rc1 or later kernel due to this commit: >

Re: [oe] all external kernel modules fail to compile with with poky and linux 5.10-rc1

On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 9:21 PM Anuj Mittal wrote: > > On Thu, 2020-11-12 at 15:57 -0800, Scott Branden via > lists.openembedded.org wrote: > > It appears the all external modules fail to compile if you try using > > the 5.10-rc1 or later kernel due to this commit: > >

[oe] [PATCH] vboxguestdrivers: fix build against kernel v5.10+

From: Bruce Ashfield We need to adjust the vboxguest drivers to build against kernels 5.10+. These are backports from the virtual box SVN repository and can be dropped in future uprevs. Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield --- ...-linux-drm-Adjustment-for-Linux-5.10.patch | 321

Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] vboxguestdrivers: Fix build with kernel 5.10

On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 12:05 PM Khem Raj wrote: > > > > On 1/5/21 2:50 AM, Jose Quaresma wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I think there are a typo in python version the patch mention 5.9 instead > > of 3.9 > > thanks I will fix it Ha! Sorry about the double send of the fix, I checked the list this

Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] vboxguestdrivers: Fix build with kernel 5.10

9:22 AM Khem Raj wrote: > > > > > > > > On 1/5/21 9:12 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 12:05 PM Khem Raj wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On 1/5/21 2:50 AM, Jose Quaresma wrote: > >

[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] vboxguestdrivers: fix build against 5.14+

From: Bruce Ashfield The bump of the reference / default kernels and libc-headers to 5.14 in oe-core broke the build of the vbox guest drivers. The upstream SVN already has 5.14 fixes for the issues, so these are SVN exports of the changes. When a new release is available, we can drop

[PATCH][oe][meta-python] python: remove recipes imported to oe-core

From: Bruce Ashfield To support device tree schema validation in kernels v5.16+, we've imported dt-schema + dependencies to core. So we can safely drop them from meta-python. Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield --- ...e-pytest-runner-to-test_requirements.patch | 32 - .../python/python3

Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] vboxguestdrivers: upgrade 6.1.26 -> 6.1.28

; >> > > >> > b/meta-oe/recipes-support/vboxguestdrivers/vboxguestdrivers/r89690-5.14-fixes.patch > >> > deleted file mode 100644 > >> > index 951bd5013..0 > >> > --- > >> > a/meta-oe/recipes-support/vboxguestdrivers/vbox

Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] vboxguestdrivers: upgrade 6.1.26 -> 6.1.28

oxguestdrivers/vboxguestdrivers/r90497-regops-5.14-fix.patch >> >> > rename >> >> > meta-oe/recipes-support/vboxguestdrivers/{vboxguestdrivers_6.1.26.bb => >> >> > vboxguestdrivers_6.1.28.bb} (92%) &g

  1   2   >