text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1: Unrecognized
inline: alistek_logo.jpg___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
Post to : openerp-community@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
More help :
Hi,
Thanks a lot for your contributions to the french translation, and thanks
Alexandre for the spellchecking.
The process for improving translation is described in our documentation[1] and
works via Launchpad's translation system, not with merge proposals/patches.
This allows a proper review
Hi Norman,
I think this should be first discussed inside the community to see who and
if it will be enough people willing to maintain the GTK.
As Fabien said it needs five full time people to maintain the GTK so you
better know who want take this commitement under his name...
Houssine
WebRep
The proposal to merge
lp:~openerp-community/openobject-addons/trunk-membership-trans-fr into
lp:openobject-addons has been updated.
Status: Needs review = Rejected
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~openerp-community/openobject-addons/trunk-membership-trans-fr/+merge/135600
Title: Eric CAUDAL
I am personnaly not in favor of
maintaining/investing time for the GTK client.
Eric CAUDAL, Elico Corp, Shanghai.
Hi Houssine,
Judging on the stability of the code, I don't think he has 5 dedicated
full timers now.
--
Pieter J. Kersten
Op 23-11-12 10:30 schreef Houssine BAKKALI:
Hi Norman,
I think this should be first discussed inside the community to see who
and if it will be enough people willing to
Pieter,
I don't have any idea on the code stability, I never worked on the GTK and
didn't want to neither.
Anyway it's not a matter of minutes for the ones that will work on this. As
I saw in a previous thread in more question on porting functionnality on
the GTK than just giving quick fixes...
On vr 23-nov-2012 10:30
Houssine BAKKALI houssine.bakk...@gmail.com wrote:
I think this should be first discussed inside the community to see who
and if it will be enough people willing to maintain the GTK.
As Fabien said it needs five full time people to maintain the GTK so
you better know
+1 for Eric's opinion.
I'am not in favor of maintaining/investing time for the GTK client, but rather
build a web-addons-community project that will bring the needed features in the
webclient. I see here features like: Keyboard shortcut, easy import/export, per
user column order, ...
Hi!
Le 23/11/2012 10:29, Olivier Dony (OpenERP) a écrit :
It should be easy enough for you to simply upload the modified .po file
through the Launchpad upload system here (see also the Batch translation
note in our documentation), via this URL:
Hi,
Indeed that's not very practical for translation reviews.
And I suppose uploading the files will not allow for a review on LP
translations either, they'll probably be directly validated.
A few extra remarks:
- # : please translate as Nb. or N° according to context
- please add accents on
sale depends on stock.
stock depends on account.
account depends on edi.
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~openerp-community/sale-wkfl/6.1-mail_quotation/+merge/135731
Your team OpenERP Community is subscribed to branch
lp:~openerp-community/sale-wkfl/6.1-mail_quotation.
Hi Jeff ,
I'm not part of the reviewers, but I suppose that the initiave should come
first from the module owner. And in this case validated by the reviewers...
First in first served I would say then for the second one... It should be
discussed, comparing code quality, stability, number of
For creating a library of functional complementary modules, it is
necessary to assess each and every new module. It will raise the bar for
newcomers. Then again, there is nothing against making a nice set of
complementary modules. But it should not be mandatory.
Some advice: Make such module
Dear all,
Some informations about the last (suggested) changes after your feedback,
hopes, and fears ;)
Project title:
--
I renamed the project title with OpenERP * prefix so we can identify them
more easily when assigning bugs (this was suggested by some of you). The
branches
On 23/11/12 07:42, Niels Huylebroeck wrote:
My future utopia is a newly developed desktop client, which would
integrate better with newer desktops, is more portable to different
platforms and has support for server pushed plugins.
I would like to hear from NaN-tic, as Koo could fulfill this
They seemed lost they faith on OpenERP at all.
We are ready to submit some bugs and patches to OpenERP GTK Community
driven client version, I believe others do to.
On 11/23/2012 04:54 PM, Martin Collins wrote:
On 23/11/12 07:42, Niels Huylebroeck wrote:
My future utopia is a newly
Sorry, previous from wrong account:
They seemed lost they faith on OpenERP at all.
We are ready to submit some bugs and patches to OpenERP GTK Community
driven client version, I believe others do to.
Normunds
On 11/23/2012 04:54 PM, Martin Collins wrote:
On 23/11/12 07:42, Niels Huylebroeck
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Joël Grand-Guillaume
joel.grandguilla...@camptocamp.com wrote:
Dear all,
Some informations about the last (suggested) changes after your feedback,
hopes, and fears ;)
Project title:
--
I renamed the project title with OpenERP * prefix so we
Hello everyone,
It's nice to see efforts gathering community for concrete developments and
sharing development planning around.
+1 from me and my team for development of OpenERP Medical, I would
suggest a community driven sprint for code back porting and code addition
from tryton medical module.
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Parthiv Patel parthiv...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello everyone,
It's nice to see efforts gathering community for concrete developments and
sharing development planning around.
+1 from me and my team for development of OpenERP Medical, I would
suggest a community
For Medical, we are targeting OpenERP 6.1 / 7.0
We will start back porting this weekend the base Medical / GNU Health
module.
If any other is going to work on that, please let us know so we can
coordinate efforts...
Regards,
-Mario
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Ovnicraft
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Mario Arias the.clone.mas...@gmail.comwrote:
For Medical, we are targeting OpenERP 6.1 / 7.0
We will start back porting this weekend the base Medical / GNU Health
module.
If any other is going to work on that, please let us know so we can
coordinate
Dear OpenERP Contributors and Translators,
A beta version of OpenERP 7.0 was published last week, and the features and
the terms to translate can now be considered frozen.
It is therefore a good time to start working on the translations for OpenERP
7.0/trunk, in order to be able to complete them
Nhomar,
We will be glad to contribute to the the 'medical' project.
Actually we are working on a review that goes beyond the migration.
We will create some blue-prints very soon.
Also it will be nice to have some inputs from Eckhard Schwarzat, from
Valuedecision.
We are starting a project for at
Excellent
2012/11/24 Juan Cristobal Lopez Arrieta juancristo...@gmail.com
Nhomar,
We will be glad to contribute to the the 'medical' project.
Actually we are working on a review that goes beyond the migration.
We will create some blue-prints very soon.
The place, to avoid
26 matches
Mail list logo
