[openhealth] Re: Liberty HSF formation process

2009-06-07 Thread Stephen Beller
I didn't think you were pointing to me, Fred, but I do thank you anyway for clarifying. To follow up on Alvin's comment, I have several other programs I'm considering licensing as FOSS, but the functions that I believe would be most useful to the FOSS community consist of a radical/disruptive

Re: [openhealth] Re: Liberty HSF formation process

2009-06-07 Thread Mark Spohr
Steve, I went back and re-read your blog to see if your thinking had evolved with something new but it does not seem to have changed. You want to 'open source' your software but keep part of it patented. It's nice that you are interested in FOSS but it doesn't work that way. If you want it to be

[openhealth] Re: Liberty HSF formation process

2009-06-07 Thread Stephen Beller
My comments over the past few days are in response to Fred's new initiative in which I thought they may have come up with a novel way bridge the FOSS-proprietary divide. I was mistaken. Nevertheless, since I still believe in FOSS and in promoting low cost/resource conserving solutions for

Re: [openhealth] Re: Liberty HSF formation process

2009-06-06 Thread fred trotter
I was speaking to patent-holders generally, and not you personally. The negotiations we have had together are the template for how a patent-holder and a community might potentially work together. Should not have used 'you' in this context. Sorry. -FT On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 6:19 AM, Stephen

Re: [openhealth] Re: Liberty HSF formation process

2009-06-06 Thread Alvin Marcelo
Hi all, We're a small university-based research group with a FOSS EHR (for govt health facilities). Are there sites/resources for business models on how such FOSS apps can prosper (economically), where the principles of FOSS are respected but where the 'investments' of the original team are also

[openhealth] Re: Liberty HSF formation process

2009-06-04 Thread fred trotter
Everyone I have talked to in the FOSS community has indicated that the feature-bucket testing model that CCHIT currently puts forward does not work for us. I would like to work with CCHIT, but not under the constraints of accepting aspects of the current model that are broken. If anyone in our

Re: [openhealth] Re: Liberty HSF formation process

2009-06-04 Thread caultonpos
...@googlegroups.com Subject: [openhealth] Re: Liberty HSF formation process Everyone I have talked to in the FOSS community has indicated that the feature-bucket testing model that CCHIT currently puts forward does not work for us. I would like to work with CCHIT, but not under the constraints

Re: [openhealth] Re: Liberty HSF formation process

2009-06-04 Thread fred trotter
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Stephen Beller sbel...@nhds.com wrote: Fred, This is encouraging and I wish you great success! Two questions: 1. How do you define hybrid vendors and distinguish them from FOSS vendors? Anyone who makes money by supporting FOSS AND by selling proprietary