I couldn't agree more with what Matt said. Perhaps it's incumbent upon us to
provide some examples/whitepapers/proof/etc of how the VA will benefit from
this proposed relationship. It's very likely that they do not understand that
the virtuous spiral which worked so well inside the VA to develop
comments inserted [mlp]
- Original Message -
From: "JohnLeo Zimmer, MD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 7:29 AM
> Thanks for the comparison, Fred.
> What we still lack, I'd suggest, is a mechanism for releasing the
> WorldVistA EHR codebase under a CentOS-style badg
1. How good does it have to be? Is 5% leakage of "sensitive information" OK?
2. Another view: ALL of the information is "sensitive".
3. Another view: The patient MUST have input as to who can see what.
- Original Message -
From: Will Ross
To: openhealth@yahoogroups.com
Sent
Correction: [see below]
- Original Message -
From: "Bhaskar, KS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The Hardhats mailing list appears to be *very* sick.
>
>[ ... snip]
> A couple of years ago, some of us played with Google groups to evaluate
> an alternative to the current hardhats list. Google
It worries me when a single organization is in a position to set the criterion
for certification and set the price. If being certified is required as entry
to some markets, then the organization is in a position similar to a government
regulator. To break up this monopoly, I would suggest that
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Schilling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: [openhealth] Demonstrations & Standards.
> Can anyone post the link again to the files section? Thanks!
>
> Richard
>
At the bottom of every email sent via this l
Tim,
I'd be interested to hear why you feel that way about the report. I have
read comments by others praising it. Perhaps they have missed something.
-mlp-
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Churches" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 11:15 PM
Subject: [open
