It worries me when a single organization is in a position to set the criterion 
for certification and set the price.  If being certified is required as entry 
to some markets, then the organization is in a position similar to a government 
regulator.  To break up this monopoly, I would suggest that others must be 
allowed to compete for your certification dollars -- all following the same 
standard criterion.  They can compete based on price, service and whatever else 
appeals to the customer.
        -mlp-

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Fred Trotter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <openhealth@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 5:29 PM
Subject: Re: [openhealth] CCHIT biased towards proprietary software??


> It sounds like there is little consensus for having any special status for
> open source software. Certainly not enough to warrant a group letter. Are
> there any more thoughts on how much a certification should cost?
> 
> -FT
> 


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/openhealth/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to