It worries me when a single organization is in a position to set the criterion
for certification and set the price. If being certified is required as entry
to some markets, then the organization is in a position similar to a government
regulator. To break up this monopoly, I would suggest that others must be
allowed to compete for your certification dollars -- all following the same
standard criterion. They can compete based on price, service and whatever else
appeals to the customer.
-mlp-
----- Original Message -----
From: "Fred Trotter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 5:29 PM
Subject: Re: [openhealth] CCHIT biased towards proprietary software??
> It sounds like there is little consensus for having any special status for
> open source software. Certainly not enough to warrant a group letter. Are
> there any more thoughts on how much a certification should cost?
>
> -FT
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/openhealth/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
