https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=263
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #14 from
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400
Summary: OFED 1.2 alpha1 IPoIB HA failover gets QP warnings
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: 1.2alpha1
Platform: X86-64
OS/Version: RHEL 4
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #1
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=371
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=371
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #2
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390
Summary: perftools don't work on alpha1
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: 1.2alpha1
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
Priority: P1
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-26 12:15 ---
ib_rdma_lat works fine.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.openfabrics.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #1
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384
Summary: OFED 1.2 alpha1 ib-bonding won't compile on RHEL4 U3
ppc64
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: 1.2alpha1
Platform: PPC64
OS/Version: RHEL 4
Status: NEW
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=371
Summary: IPoIB HA not working properly with OFED1.2-alpha
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: 1.2alpha1
Platform: X86-64
OS/Version: RHEL 4
Status: NEW
Severity: major
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=371
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-19 03:56 ---
It is working fine on SLES10 systems.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.openfabrics.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=347
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=318
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|1.1 |1.2
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=315
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|gen2|1.2
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=318
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-14 04:18 ---
Subject: Re: Registering up to 1.6 GB in one process causes a machine crash
Driver Version: OFED 1.1
Is this still relevant?
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=296
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|1.1 |1.2
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=296
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #1
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=318
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351
Summary: Routing table problem in SLES10 when using port #2
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: 1.2
Platform: All
OS/Version: SLES 10
Status: NEW
Severity: major
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=347
Summary: rdma cm backport to EL4 - U3 broken
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: 1.2
Platform: X86-64
OS/Version: RHEL 4
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
Priority: P1
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334
--- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-05 04:02 ---
Note that /etc/issue belongs to a SLES package:
rpm thyme:~ # rpm -qf /etc/issue
sles-release-10-15.2
Deleting it means that you corrupt your system. One can also delete
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334
--- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-03 23:07 ---
(In reply to comment #13)
I want to ask someone how I can apply the patch during build.sh run script?
As I know when I run build.sh my old files with patch always update
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334
--- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-02 03:42 ---
Created an attachment (id=74)
-- (https://bugs.openfabrics.org/attachment.cgi?id=74action=view)
Patch for ofed_scripts/configure
I have added a patch file for configure in
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334
--- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-02 03:56 ---
I want to ask someone how I can apply the patch during build.sh run script?
As I know when I run build.sh my old files with patch always update throught
run rpm -i
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-01 00:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=71)
-- (https://bugs.openfabrics.org/attachment.cgi?id=71action=view)
ofed.conf
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-01 00:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=72)
-- (https://bugs.openfabrics.org/attachment.cgi?id=72action=view)
ofed_net.conf
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-01 02:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=73)
-- (https://bugs.openfabrics.org/attachment.cgi?id=73action=view)
The file configuration for OFED
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334
--- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-01 05:02 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
I try to build the product again and i saw thet pathces from
kernel_patches/backport/2.6.16_sles10/ directory not applied automaticaly.
When
I
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334
--- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-01 05:57 ---
Edit ofed_scripts/configure and add the line: echo ${KVERSION} where the
switch starts in line 214. See what happens in case 2.6.16*.
When I try to run build.sh I see in log
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334
--- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-01 06:15 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Edit ofed_scripts/configure and add the line: echo ${KVERSION} where the
switch starts in line 214. See what happens in case 2.6.16*.
When I try
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334
Summary: Problems with build OFED-1.1.1-ib_local_sa
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: gen2
Platform: X86-64
OS/Version: SLES 10
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=332
Summary: Data does not get to IPv6 sockets after driver reset
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: gen2
Platform: All
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=325
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #1
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=325
Summary: RDMA_CM and address translation broken on sles9sp3
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: 1.2
Platform: X86-64
OS/Version: SLES 9
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=326
Summary: match_token doesn't consume/userstand trailing \n when
parsing integer options
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: 1.1
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status:
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=327
Summary: want to set the scsi target id during srp login
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: 1.1
Platform: All
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=323
Summary: After fatal event on the hca, the ipoib doesn't return
to connected mode
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: gen2
Platform: All
OS/Version: Other
Status:
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=324
Summary: After fatal event on the hca, the ipoib doesn't return
to connected mode
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: gen2
Platform: All
OS/Version: Other
Status:
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-18 23:36 ---
Created an attachment (id=68)
-- (http://openib.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=68action=view)
Patch fixes this issue (by Roland)
This patch fix race between cancel and receive.
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- You are receiving
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=293
Summary: udev rules should be KERNEL== not KERNEL=
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: gen2
Platform: All
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=289
Summary: executing ucmatose on local IPoIB address of IB port 2
in kernel 2.6.16.21-0.8-smp fails
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: 1.1
Platform: All
OS/Version: SLES 10
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263
--- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-06 20:26 ---
I finally spent some time tracking this down and I believe the problem is
actually in the MAD layer. I will post more details and a patch to
openib-general.
--- You are
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=286
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-25 00:30 ---
Can you check it with OFED 1.1?
Also please upgrade FW version to 4.7.600 since this is the version we
qualified OFED 1.1 with
Thanks,
Tziporet
--- You are receiving
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=286
Summary: ifconfig ib# down hangs telnet connection-- NETDEV
WATCHDOG: ib0: transmit timed out
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: 1.0rc6
Platform: X86
OS/Version: SLES 9
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=159
--- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-20 10:33 ---
Created an attachment (id=65)
-- (http://openib.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=65action=view)
Implementation of new interface
This is the implementation of the
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263
--- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-18 09:56 ---
Roland, I enabled debug_level=1 with OFED 1.1 rc7 RHEL4 U3 x86_64, and got same
crash (netserver machine).
I could only see the debug_level=1 info by running dmesg in a loop,
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263
--- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-16 23:05 ---
I'm trying debug_level=1 now, sorry for the delay, but I wanted to finish other
rc7 testing.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- You are
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-12 06:00 ---
calling netif_stop_queue() doesnt immediately stop the transmit queue. it
might be necessary to take priv-tx_lock when calling netif_stop_queue() from
ipoib_stop() to ensure
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263
--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-12 06:07 ---
why is it necessary to ensure that ipoib_start_xmit()
isnt in the middle of some work?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug,
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263
--- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-12 07:17 ---
ipoib_start_xmit() only checks at entry to see if the queue is stopped.
ipoib_start_xmit() could still unicast_arp_send() after a netif_stop_queue().
in ipoib_stop(), i guess
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263
--- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-12 07:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=62)
-- (http://openib.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62action=view)
Please test this patch - does the crash happen with it?
Interesting. As a test,
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|1.1rc6 |1.1rc7
--- Comment #2 from
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=279
Summary: OFED: warning when building uverbs_main.c on RHEL4 U3
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: 1.1rc7
Platform: Other
OS/Version: RHEL 4
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-11 15:13 ---
In both cases the final crash seems to be in the call
spin_lock_irqsave(priv-lock, flags);
in path_rec_completion(). This would seem to indicate some sort of memory
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263
--- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-11 15:25 ---
OK, most likely dev_queue_xmit() is returning an error because the device is
down, but that should be OK. I guess we have a race somewhere with up/downing
the device at the same
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-11 16:35 ---
Scott, could you add debug_level=1 to the ib_ipoib module flags and rerun one
of these tests? That will generate a boatload of logging output, but I'd just
like to see the last
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-09 23:14 ---
I think Cisco SM is dropping ports which do not answer its queries,
opensm does not, which is why things still work with opensm even
if the mad thread goes inactive for a while.
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229
--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-10 03:31 ---
What timeout does Cisco SM use for transactions ?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-09 15:35 ---
A customer reported this problem only happens with Cisco SM, I have asked our
SM team to investigate.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272
Summary: IPoIB: kernel Oops as a result of interface Up/Down
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: 1.1rc7
Platform: X86-64
OS/Version: SLES 10
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229
--- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-08 20:02 ---
RENICE_IB_MAD=yes works well on RHEL4 U4 x86_64 on Dell PE 1950 Woodcrest
system.
I haven't tried on a newer kernel yet.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=266
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-05 02:24 ---
default:
if (dir) {
memcpy(haddr, dev-broadcast, dev-addr_len);
Looking on the code, what going on here is that as the ARPHRD_INFINIBAND case
does
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=266
Summary: IPoIB multicast does not work with RHEL4 U4
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: 1.1rc6
Platform: All
OS/Version: RHEL 4
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority:
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=261
Summary: can't configure IPoIB pkey interfaces at boot time
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: 1.1rc6
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=261
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-03 07:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=49)
-- (http://openib.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49action=view)
diff to support vlans on a parent interface
we use the following locally. it
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263
Summary: OFED 1.1 rc6: IPoIB Oops during IPoIB failover loop
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: 1.1rc6
Platform: X86-64
OS/Version: SLES 10
Status: NEW
Severity: major
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256
Summary: Missing include in ib_verbs.h
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: 1.1rc6
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-30 21:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=47)
-- (http://openib.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47action=view)
Add missing include
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- You are
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #2 from
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-11 23:14 ---
Put email in bugzilla:
Hmm, OK.
I'd like to figure out whether this could be something other than a scheduler
issue.
Could you test on kernel 2.6.18 or 2.6.17 please?
If this is
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229
Summary: heavy CPU load can starve ib_mad thread on latest
processors
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: 1.1rc3
Platform: All
OS/Version: RHEL 4
Status: NEW
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-11 00:58 ---
Which SM are you running ?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-11 21:54 ---
Cisco embedded SM on a switch, thus no SM on a host, only IB drivers.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- You are
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222
Summary: ib_uverbs fails to load on ia64, OFED 1.1 - rc3
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: 1.1rc3
Platform: IA64
OS/Version: RHEL 4
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=131
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=145
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218
Summary: Call usage verifier is detecting reinitialization of
spinlocks already in use
Product: OpenFabrics Windows
Version: unspecified
Platform: X86
OS/Version: Other
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211
Summary: libibcm.so is unversioned
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: 1.1rc4
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
Priority: P2
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213
Summary: librdmacm uses deprecated libsysfs function
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: 1.1rc4
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
http://openib.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-28 12:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=39)
-- (http://openib.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39action=view)
Fix for use of dead function
This would need to be slightly modified to check for
1 - 100 of 254 matches
Mail list logo
