On 02/22/2013 02:16 AM, Timothy Coalson wrote:
The first parity uses straight XOR on uint64_t, while the second parity
performs the LFSR on all bytes in a uint64_t with some bitwise math (search
for VDEV_RAIDZ_64MUL_2) that adds up to 8 operators by my count, followed
by xor - using the LFSR
Dear all,
I think the whole support discussion might be futile. Let's face it, OI does
not have the backing commercial organization others have. But so didn't Linux
in its beginnings. The rules for using OpenIndiana in a professional
environment are clear and everyone can decide if lacking
sorry to but in, but how does this differ from the tuntap made by
Maxim Krasnyansky that's in the SFE?
Jon
On 21 February 2013 19:24, Gordon Ross gordon.w.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Maurizio Boriani bau...@yahoo.it wrote:
Hi all,
in openindiana 151a7, the tuntap
On 2013-02-22 13:21, Jonathan Adams wrote:
sorry to but in, but how does this differ from the tuntap made by
Maxim Krasnyansky that's in the SFE?
(Moderately informed FUD follows)
I believe, that the original tuntap by Maxim Krasnyansky was made
primarily for BSD/Linux, and needed some
On 2013-02-22 10:23, Stefan Müller-Wilken wrote:
Dear all,
I think the whole support discussion might be futile. Let's face it, OI does
not have the backing commercial organization others have. But so didn't Linux
in its beginnings. The rules for using OpenIndiana in a professional
I know it's not totally relevant, but do you know how significant the
difference is between our iptun/vnic/bridges and tun/tap
would it ever be possible to configure OpenVPN to work with a pure
Illumos/Solaris 11 interface?
We use static IP tun interfaces here between our known sites, and
On 2013-02-22 13:58, Jonathan Adams wrote:
I know it's not totally relevant, but do you know how significant the
difference is between our iptun/vnic/bridges and tun/tap
would it ever be possible to configure OpenVPN to work with a pure
Illumos/Solaris 11 interface?
AFAIK, no or not soon.
*
On 2013-02-22 13:58, Jonathan Adams wrote:
I know it's not totally relevant, but do you know how significant the
difference is between our iptun/vnic/bridges and tun/tap
would it ever be possible to configure OpenVPN to work with a pure
Illumos/Solaris 11 interface?
Giving it a bit more
On 22/02/2013 13:51, Jim Klimov wrote:
Also, is there some required or sufficient amount of progress in
illumos-gate alone (i.e. Saso's new ZFS features, recent integrated
driver updates and generic features and bugfixes contributed by
many developers) to warrant creation of a new
Just installed the OI-157.1.7 ISO w/o adding anything beyond default.
The network is now inordinately slow, and I cannot easily see what's
wrong: please suggest how to find out what's wrong.
It is set up as follows:
I disabled network/physical:nwam, enabled network/physical:default.
Hi Hans,
I'd start with looking into kstat output for e1000g*.
HTH
Michael
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Hans J. Albertsson
hans.j.alberts...@branneriet.se wrote:
Just installed the OI-157.1.7 ISO w/o adding anything beyond default.
The network is now inordinately slow, and I cannot
On 22/02/2013 14:57, Hans J. Albertsson wrote:
Just installed the OI-157.1.7 ISO w/o adding anything beyond default.
The network is now inordinately slow, and I cannot easily see what's
wrong: please suggest how to find out what's wrong.
It is set up as follows:
I disabled
Hans,
are both interfaces connected to the same hub/switch?
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Hans J. Albertsson
hans.j.alberts...@branneriet.se wrote:
Just installed the OI-157.1.7 ISO w/o adding anything beyond default.
The network is now inordinately slow, and I cannot easily see what's
Okay, with that in mind, I take it that we should be looking to
migrate to the tuntap by Kazuyoshi Aizawa, since this is being
actively maintained (Maxim Krasnyansky's driver was last updated in
2001)
are there any significant disadvantages in doing this?
I currently have system/network/tuntap
On 22/02/2013 14:57, Hans J. Albertsson wrote:
Just installed the OI-157.1.7 ISO w/o adding anything beyond default.
The network is now inordinately slow, and I cannot easily see what's
wrong: please suggest how to find out what's wrong.
It is set up as follows:
I disabled
can you try to traceroute -n 8.8.8.8 it might well be a DNS problem
On 22 February 2013 14:06, Michael Schuster michaelspriv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hans,
are both interfaces connected to the same hub/switch?
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Hans J. Albertsson
hans.j.alberts...@branneriet.se
SFE is using http://www.whiteboard.ne.jp/~admin2/tuntap/ as the source
Milan
On 22.02.2013 14:21, Jonathan Adams wrote:
sorry to but in, but how does this differ from the tuntap made by
Maxim Krasnyansky that's in the SFE?
Jon
On 21 February 2013 19:24, Gordon Ross gordon.w.r...@gmail.com
17 matches
Mail list logo
