Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] What to do with 4k sector SATA drives... All fixes are for SCSI drives only!!??

2013-03-20 Thread Ian Collins
Hans J. Albertsson wrote: i think I've just got a problem because of machine age! if I can muster enough courage ok, well, being retired, what can harm me now? I have my sata controllers in that machine in ide mode... gaah.. snip Will I have to export/backup the entire thing to another

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] What to do with 4k sector SATA drives... All fixes are for SCSI drives only!!??

2013-03-20 Thread Hans J. Albertsson
As you can see in later instalments of this thread, I did the following, which worked; reboot, catch on the way up to modify BIOS. (Not as easy as you might think: my KVM and my notebook wouldn't cooperate until I connected a different, USB, keyboard AND reconfigured the KVM end concerning

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] bmc driver in Openindiana for Supermicro IPMI controllers?

2013-03-20 Thread Hans J. Albertsson
I tried the solaris bmc driver... Not good: ipmitool -I bmc user list makes the box crash and dump Some other commands had the same effect. I can probably live with accessing the server ipmis solely from my laptop. Out the bmc and sbms/ipmi drivers go. On 2013-03-19 22:53, Hans J.

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] bmc driver in Openindiana for Supermicro IPMI controllers?

2013-03-20 Thread Jim Klimov
On 2013-03-19 23:34, James Carlson wrote: On 03/19/13 17:53, Hans J. Albertsson wrote: And: would it be legal to install and use Sun's bmc or sbmc+ipmi drivers from the oracle solaris repository??? It depends on what you mean. Your copy of OpenIndiana is yours and you alone can determine

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] bmc driver in Openindiana for Supermicro IPMI controllers?

2013-03-20 Thread Jim Klimov
On 2013-03-20 11:05, Jim Klimov wrote: That said, bmc from sxce snv_130 or so does work on OI copied ditto (search the net for my posts last year or so). There were some tricks to use it with Thumper's botched IPMI card implementation, but that applied originally as well. Also, the original

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] 3737 days of uptime

2013-03-20 Thread Edward Ned Harvey (openindiana)
From: dormitionsk...@hotmail.com [mailto:dormitionsk...@hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 11:42 PM A Sun Solaris machine was shut down last week in Hungary, I think, after 3737 days of uptime. Below are links to the article and video. Warning: It might bring a tear to your

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] 3737 days of uptime

2013-03-20 Thread Sašo Kiselkov
On 03/20/2013 12:32 PM, Edward Ned Harvey (openindiana) wrote: It would only bring a tear to my eye, because of how foolishly irresponsible that is. 3737 days of uptime means 10 years of never applying security patches and bugfixes. Whenever people are proud of a really long uptime, it's a

[OpenIndiana-discuss] How can one test in situ, and under OI, the physical blocksize a SATA disk actually reports??

2013-03-20 Thread Hans J. Albertsson
I absolutely need such a tool. Don't ask... ah well, to impress a silly would-be colleague. I tried parted and gparted and a few others: but I can't seem to make them report what I want to know. cfgadm, luxadm, ??? ___ OpenIndiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] How can one test in situ, and under OI, the physical blocksize a SATA disk actually reports??

2013-03-20 Thread Reginald Beardsley
FWIW This is how and shows what an ST2000DM001 properly configured using sd.conf reports: oi%rhb {2} echo ::sd_state | mdb -k | egrep '^un|blocksize' un 0: ff0140ddfd00 un_sys_blocksize = 0x200 un_tgt_blocksize = 0x200 un_phy_blocksize = 0x1000 un_f_tgt_blocksize_is_valid

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] How can one test in situ, and under OI, the physical blocksize a SATA disk actually reports??

2013-03-20 Thread Hans J. Albertsson
Well, what I was looking for is what the physical drive without any prodding from sd.conf would respond... On 2013-03-20 14:21, Reginald Beardsley wrote: FWIW This is how and shows what an ST2000DM001 properly configured using sd.conf reports: oi%rhb {2} echo ::sd_state | mdb -k | egrep

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] How can one test in situ, and under OI, the physical blocksize a SATA disk actually reports??

2013-03-20 Thread Hans J. Albertsson
But still, your suggestion helped me find a bunch of mistakes on the way... So THANK YOU , and never mind my cantankerous self... On 2013-03-20 14:47, Hans J. Albertsson wrote: Well, what I was looking for is what the physical drive without any prodding from sd.conf would respond... On

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] How can one test in situ, and under OI, the physical blocksize a SATA disk actually reports??

2013-03-20 Thread Rich
Modern versions of smartctl can also tell you: smartctl 6.1 2013-03-16 r3800 [i386-pc-solaris2.11] (local build) Copyright (C) 2002-13, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, www.smartmontools.org === START OF INFORMATION SECTION === Device Model: ST2000DL003-9VT166 Serial Number:5YD5LYEW LU WWN

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] How can one test in situ, and under OI, the physical blocksize a SATA disk actually reports??

2013-03-20 Thread Hans J. Albertsson
Hmm. I'm having problems. I think I've followed the advice in http://wiki.illumos.org/display/illumos/ZFS+and+Advanced+Format+disks format returns --- format inq Vendor: ATA Product: WDC WD20EARS-00M Revision: AB51 format --- the last few lines in my sd.conf look like --- # # The

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] How can one test in situ, and under OI, the physical blocksize a SATA disk actually reports??

2013-03-20 Thread Rich
I had luck with the following entry when I couldn't easily convince the matching to work, perhaps it's overkill for you. sd-config-list = **,physical-block-size:4096; - Rich On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Hans J. Albertsson hans.j.alberts...@branneriet.se wrote: Hmm. I'm having problems.

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] How can one test in situ, and under OI, the physical blocksize a SATA disk actually reports??

2013-03-20 Thread Hans J. Albertsson
Since I have my rpool on two 500G SATA disks with 512b sectors for real maybe that would be not over, but kill :-) On 2013-03-20 15:57, Rich wrote: I had luck with the following entry when I couldn't easily convince the matching to work, perhaps it's overkill for you. sd-config-list =

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] How can one test in situ, and under OI, the physical blocksize a SATA disk actually reports??

2013-03-20 Thread Reginald Beardsley
--- On Wed, 3/20/13, Hans J. Albertsson hans.j.alberts...@branneriet.se wrote: From: Hans J. Albertsson hans.j.alberts...@branneriet.se Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] How can one test in situ, and under OI, the physical blocksize a SATA disk actually reports?? To: Discussion list for

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] How can one test in situ, and under OI, the physical blocksize a SATA disk actually reports??

2013-03-20 Thread Hans J. Albertsson
Where does George Wilson discuss this?? On 2013-03-20 16:51, Reginald Beardsley wrote: The biggest obstacle I ran into was the omission of the step to reconfigure the driver using cfgadm by detaching and reattaching as discussed by George Wilson.

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Bash brace expansion in non-C locales??

2013-03-20 Thread Jim Klimov
On 2013-03-13 09:56, Hans J. Albertsson wrote: A Q about the Slovak language: while you were in a union with the Czechs, did the languages start to unify spontaneously? I mean like vocabulary changes, minor grammatical drift, spelling oddities changing and so on and so forth? I've got a bit

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] How can one test in situ, and under OI, the physical blocksize a SATA disk actually reports??

2013-03-20 Thread Reginald Beardsley
Link's at top of this page: http://wiki.illumos.org/display/illumos/ZFS+and+Advanced+Format+disks http://blog.delphix.com/gwilson/2012/11/15/4k-sectors-and-zfs/ --- On Wed, 3/20/13, Hans J. Albertsson hans.j.alberts...@branneriet.se wrote: From: Hans J. Albertsson

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] 3737 days of uptime

2013-03-20 Thread Jason Matthews
long uptimes are not hard to achieve. i bet if i got my old sparc ipx out from college days and booted it the system would report about thirteen years if uptime. i think i last used it in the summer of 2000. i shut it down last time by putting it to sleep. when it boots, assuming battery is

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] 3737 days of uptime

2013-03-20 Thread Robbie Crash
I had to reboot after about 200 days of uptime the other day because I updated netatalk, which created a new BE. I don't really understand why a non-kernel package, for a non-essential service, would need a new BE. Is there a way to avoid this kind of thing so in the future I can brag about

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] 3737 days of uptime

2013-03-20 Thread Rennie Allen
I worked for QNX back in the early 2000's. At that time QNX had a fairly complete design for performing kernel upgrades on a live system. Because QNX is a microkernel, this was doable. I can't get too deep into the details, but essentially it required a set of permanently reserved memory pages

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Boot errors I need to understand and possibly deal with, please advise!

2013-03-20 Thread Jonathan Adams
yeah, to disable the kvm stuff you'll need to remove the kvm packages ... On 19 March 2013 18:24, Hans J. Albertsson hans.j.alberts...@branneriet.se wrote: Hmm. The only bit running is xvm/vnc-config. The packages are needed by lots of other stuff: slim_install and such. Well. On

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Boot errors I need to understand and possibly deal with, please advise!

2013-03-20 Thread Hans J. Albertsson
Which you can't.. and there are no kvm packages... there are xvm, xen, virtualbox... which of those decided to advertise itself as kvm??? Not very well designed. On 2013-03-20 22:29, Jonathan Adams wrote: yeah, to disable the kvm stuff you'll need to remove the kvm packages ... On 19 March

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Boot errors I need to understand and possibly deal with, please advise!

2013-03-20 Thread Hans J. Albertsson
I wish On 2013-03-19 14:51, Hans J. Albertsson wrote: Once I got this all in place after changing IDE mode to AHCI mode for SATA, I started noticing a couple of boot errors that I need to understand, maybe even do something about.. For all: Are they real problems or not?? (My guess is

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] zfs-auto-snapshot yet again

2013-03-20 Thread Roman Naumenko
dormitionsk...@hotmail.com said the following, on 19-03-13 7:14 PM: On Mar 18, 2013, at 10:00 PM, Roman Naumenko wrote: Hi, Just wanted to ask if this is the latest version of time-slider? data:~$ pkginfo -l SUNWgnome-time-slider PKGINST: SUNWgnome-time-slider NAME: Time Slider ZFS