2012-09-06 18:23, Gary Mills пишет:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 10:06:15AM -0400, Gary Gendel wrote:
Whoops! Make that I was wondering if I should include the client.
I guessed that was it. I'd expect the client to be in a separate
package since it should replace `dhcpagent' and possibly
Actually, since I'm only interested in prefix delegation, I tried an
experiment.
My external nic is bge0 and my internal nic is bge1.
I have ipfilter set up currently to allow everything on ipv6:
pass in on any all
pass out on any all
When I start dhclient to get the address block from the
On 09/07/12 09:12, Gary Gendel wrote:
I fail with a No route to host message. The full output is:
No route to host typically means that the routing table has trouble,
not that there's anything wrong with IP Filter.
At a guess, you may need to do this:
ifconfig inet6 bge0 plumb up
Is
On 6 September 2012 02:51, Bob Friesenhahn bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Gary Gendel wrote:
snip
If the answer is that I should be able to replace it, the next question is
if anyone has done this before and how difficult this would be to do.
I assume you are talking
Jon,
Oracle is deprecating the Sun dhcp server and replacing it with ISC
based upon what I've been reading. It's one of the reasons that Oracle
pushed changes to the ISC source. Regardless, I have no reason to
replace the server since it has everything I need in a dhcp server.
Others don't
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 08:51:58PM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Gary Gendel wrote:
Anyone know if there is a fundamental reason why we can't
wholesale replace the Sun/Oracle dhcp client with the ISC one? If
we don't get any updates downstream from Oracle we will never
Au contraire mon frere. :)
I packaged the server up and I'm waiting for the thumbs up to push it
into the main branch. I was wondering if I should include the server.
As for the client on Solaris, my interpretation of the text tells me
that it may work but since it exists on Solaris they
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 10:06:15AM -0400, Gary Gendel wrote:
Whoops! Make that I was wondering if I should include the client.
I guessed that was it. I'd expect the client to be in a separate
package since it should replace `dhcpagent' and possibly `dhcpinfo'
and `in.ndpd', and might require
Hi,
Anyone know if there is a fundamental reason why we can't wholesale
replace the Sun/Oracle dhcp client with the ISC one? If we don't get
any updates downstream from Oracle we will never get features like ipv6
prefix delegation. This feature is becoming important as some big ISPs
(i.e.
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Gary Gendel g...@genashor.com wrote:
Hi,
Anyone know if there is a fundamental reason why we can't wholesale replace
the Sun/Oracle dhcp client with the ISC one? If we don't get any updates
downstream from Oracle we will never get features like ipv6 prefix
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Gary Gendel wrote:
Hi,
Anyone know if there is a fundamental reason why we can't wholesale replace
the Sun/Oracle dhcp client with the ISC one? If we don't get any updates
downstream from Oracle we will never get features like ipv6 prefix
delegation. This feature is
11 matches
Mail list logo
