Using your own builders is fine, I mean you best not use the deprecated ones as
they will be disappearing.
On Aug 29, 2013, at 10:56 PM, Tom Eugelink wrote:
>
> I know, the question was based on the "best to cycle off builders" remark,
> then what is advised to use as an alternative?
>
> Tom
I know, the question was based on the "best to cycle off builders" remark, then
what is advised to use as an alternative?
Tom
On 2013-08-30 06:56, Richard Bair wrote:
You can still use your own Builders and plug them into FXML. Its just that the
built in set won't be there. But the Builder
Changeset: c661253e25cf
Author:jgiles
Date: 2013-08-30 13:56 +1200
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8/controls/rt/rev/c661253e25cf
RT-32559: TableView: replaced columns disappear
!
modules/controls/src/main/java/com/sun/javafx/scene/control/skin/NestedTableColumnHeader.java
You can still use your own Builders and plug them into FXML. Its just that the
built in set won't be there. But the Builder base class and all the FXML
support is still there. All mentioned in that long thread :-D
Richard
On Aug 29, 2013, at 9:50 PM, Tom Eugelink wrote:
>
> This week I ran i
This week I ran into the problem that I needed to provide a date format
(attribute in FXML) to one of my controls. So I needed a way to convert a
string to DateFormat, or even a comma separated list to a list of DateFormats.
This I solved with a builder for that control. How would one solved t
Changeset: 056f995f83e4
Author:rbair
Date: 2013-08-29 16:58 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8/graphics/rt/rev/056f995f83e4
Fixed bug I introduced where "reset" always set the pointer to -1, whereas the
assumption before was that reset would put the pointer on the firs
Changeset: 4cf6e02ce489
Author:rbair
Date: 2013-08-29 14:45 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8/graphics/rt/rev/4cf6e02ce489
RT-32589: Add better diagnostic and debug tools for dirty regions, culling, and
overdraw
Reviewed-By: Steve Northover, Martin Sladecek
Added a n
Deprecated in 8 and removed from the JavaDoc, gone in 9 (will be available as a
separately downloadable Jar so you can keep using them, but they won't be
updated). We're removing them from samples.
Best to cycle off the builders.
Richard
On Aug 29, 2013, at 12:42 PM, Felix Bembrick wrote:
>
Changeset: c52ac94b9d02
Author:leifs
Date: 2013-08-29 12:48 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8/controls/rt/rev/c52ac94b9d02
RT-24920: [CheckBox, RadioButton] Layout regression (was: Text Overrun
incorrect work in CheckBox and RadioButton)
!
modules/controls/src/main/
Thanks Jonathan,
So what is Oracle's current position on this? Are Builders in or out? If
out, when will they be removed and how?
On 30 August 2013 05:31, Jonathan Giles wrote:
> You can catch up on the back story here:
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2013-March/006725.h
Actually you are privy to the original discussion -- it is all in the mailing
list history :-)
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2013-March/006725.html
The long and the short of it -- getting the generics right in a way that
allowed for API evolution turned out to be a nightmar
You can catch up on the back story here:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2013-March/006725.html
-- Jonathan
On 30/08/2013 7:06 a.m., Felix Bembrick wrote:
> I was not privy to the original discussion but I am lead to believe that
> Builders are no longer considered fashionable
I was not privy to the original discussion but I am lead to believe that
Builders are no longer considered fashionable and that we are advised not to
use them.
While I realise that every type of Node basically needed its own Builder, could
someone please outline why this situation has arisen?
Changeset: 40312b689a50
Author:snorthov
Date: 2013-08-29 14:48 -0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8/graphics/rt/rev/40312b689a50
RT-31367 [SWT] Custom data types cannot be transfered with DnD
reviewed by anton
! modules/swt/src/main/java/javafx/embed/swt/FXCanvas.java
Changeset: bde440f8dad6
Author:mv157916
Date: 2013-08-22 21:51 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8/master/rt/rev/bde440f8dad6
RT-32499: Update the JDK build number to b104 in rt/build.properties file in
the JavaFX 8 Master forest.
! build.properties
Changeset: 1495f12
Hi Felipe,
thanks for the response. I added a comment to the JIRA issue. I don't have IE
installed on my system, but I just made a similar comparison with text in
Outlook, and it was indistinguishable from the text in Firefox.
Cheers,
Rob
Von: Felipe Heidrich [mailto:felipe.heidr...@oracl
I need to know what is been tested (the code snippet that created the JFX
sample) and native app that produced the other sample.
I think what is going on there is that in JFX we are producing our own subpixel
glyphs in the shader (instead using DW to produce subpixel glyph images).
Note the cur
Hi Robert,
Please add this information to https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-14187
See my previous message, it is possible the difference is due to the shader we
use to produce subpixel glyphs.
I would have used IE as a representative of a native Windows Microsoft app, but
I get the point.
On Aug 28, 2013, at 2:26 AM, John C. Turnbull wrote:
> Is kerning planned for a Java 8 update or will it have to wait for 9? Or
> 10?
I'm not the one who makes the plan but we should be able to get it in a Java 8
update.
Felipe
Hello,
Jira: https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-31256
I just want to add
Point3D:
/**
* Point or vector with all three coordinates set to 0.
*/
public static final Point3D ZERO = new Point3D(0.0, 0.0, 0.0);
Point2D:
/**
* Point or vector with both coordinates set
Changeset: b4067344e883
Author:Pavel Safrata
Date: 2013-08-29 14:40 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8/graphics/rt/rev/b4067344e883
RT-32455: removed obsolete WeakReferenceMap.
- modules/graphics/src/main/java/com/sun/javafx/WeakReferenceMap.java
- modules/graphics/sr
Changeset: 02dab18d5824
Author:Alexander Zvegintsev
Date: 2013-08-29 17:09 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8/graphics/rt/rev/02dab18d5824
RT-31730 Gtk: Incorrect screen coordinates reporting
! modules/graphics/src/main/native-glass/gtk/GlassView.cpp
! modules/graphics
Changeset: f219f9bc5347
Author:Pavel Safrata
Date: 2013-08-29 14:25 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8/graphics/rt/rev/f219f9bc5347
Graphics NetBeans project: fixed debugging tests.
! netbeans/graphics/build.xml
Hi all,
I've done a few tests to compare font rendering between JavaFX and something
native on my 64bit Windows 7 machine. I used Firefox to test native font
rendering, and JavaFX 8 b100 (my apologies if something's been fixed since
then), using the code Phil just posted to create a Label, expl
Changeset: e1d138d550e9
Author:Petr Pchelko
Date: 2013-08-29 11:06 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8/graphics/rt/rev/e1d138d550e9
RT-27065 Win: [GlassRobot] GlassRobot can't press some keyboard buttons in one
time
Reviewed-by: anthony, art
! modules/graphics/src/mai
These observations are consistent with what I have been experiencing and
trying to describe.
There is still quite a difference between native text and JavaFX text with
native text certainly looking better.
Is there any hope that this will improve? It may sound petty/minor but to
me this is criti
Ok so apparently I can't send .bmp attachments to this list. Here's an imgur
link:
http://imgur.com/d5AiHFk
It looks identical to the .bmp, as far as I can tell.
Cheers,
Rob
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: openjfx-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net
[mailto:openjfx-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.n
27 matches
Mail list logo
