Re: fx 1.x issues in JBS

For practical purposes you can treat resolved and closed as the same. Resolved/fixed versus Closed/fixed does indeed mean what you think, but the majority of bugs are never verified, so that difference is really only of interest to the testing organization. I always treat them as the same in

Re: fx 1.x issues in JBS

I see, was not aware that there are enough similarities between 1.x and later versions. About Resolved issues, I thought that they are waiting for a fix confirmation to be Closed. On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 5:29 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote: > While I suspect many of them

Cross Compilling linux Arm OpenJdk9 javaFx

Currently use Arm java8 from Oracle and compile Openjfx for Arm and overlay libraries for current product line. Looking to test Java9 on Arm and upgrade product line in next generation release. Cross Compiling openJdk9 for Arm works fine Trying to compile openJfx from

Re: [11] Review Request: JDK-8167096 RFE: change the default INITIAL_DURATION_MS to match the behavior of JSpinner

Hi Prem, Since this adds new API, this needs a CSR. In general it is best to get any proposed API additions reviewed on this alias before spending much time on it. In this case, the newly proposed API is a simple property, and is the obvious solution, so the API itself looks fine. Can you

Re: fx 1.x issues in JBS

While I suspect many of them can be closed out at this point, it is not necessarily a given that they are irrelevant (the scene graph, animation, and graphics engine evolved from 1.x to 2.0). I agree that it would be good to take a pass over them and close out the ones that are no longer

fx 1.x issues in JBS

Hello, JBS still has open issues for JavaFX 1 versions and they appear in searches even though there's nothing to do about them since that version is not supported anymore. Is it appropriate to close them all? There are also a lot in Resolved. - Nir

[11] Review Request: JDK-8167096 RFE: change the default INITIAL_DURATION_MS to match the behavior of JSpinner

Hi Kevin, Ajit Request you to review following fix: Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8167096 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pkbalakr/fx/8167096/webrev00/ Regards, Prem