I think defaulting to UnsupportedOperationException is a good choice.
This shouldn't break existing usages of 3rd party implementations,
since they wouldn't be calling those APIs anyway.
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:55 PM John Hendrikx wrote:
>
> [...]
> EventTarget is already public API, and so t
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 17:06:12 GMT, yosbits wrote:
> The reason I think the Null Safe explanation is incorrect is because In the
> interest of fairness, I feel it would be better to have an example of using
> the Optional API when comparing the existing way of writing to the new way of
> writing
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 07:46:40 GMT, John Hendrikx wrote:
>> This is an implementation of the proposal in
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8274771 that me and Nir Lisker
>> (@nlisker) have been working on. It's a complete implementation including
>> good test coverage.
>>
>> This w
On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 21:38:28 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> This is an implementation of the proposal in
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8274771 that me and Nir Lisker
>> (@nlisker) have been working on. It's a complete implementation including
>> good test coverage.
>>
>> This
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 07:46:40 GMT, John Hendrikx wrote:
>> This is an implementation of the proposal in
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8274771 that me and Nir Lisker
>> (@nlisker) have been working on. It's a complete implementation including
>> good test coverage.
>>
>> This w
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 07:46:40 GMT, John Hendrikx wrote:
>> This is an implementation of the proposal in
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8274771 that me and Nir Lisker
>> (@nlisker) have been working on. It's a complete implementation including
>> good test coverage.
>>
>> This w
findSibling adapted to only use visible menus when calculating the
index.
-
Commit messages:
- 8283509: Invisible menus can lead to IndexOutOfBoundsException
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/759/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jfx&pr=759&range=00
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 12:38:43 GMT, yosbits wrote:
> This PR is considered a design change that delegates multiple
> responsibilities to the basic JavaFX class ObservableValue. The balance
> between implementation complexity and convenience seems to be a point of
> contention.
If you could do a
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 07:46:40 GMT, John Hendrikx wrote:
>> This is an implementation of the proposal in
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8274771 that me and Nir Lisker
>> (@nlisker) have been working on. It's a complete implementation including
>> good test coverage.
>>
>> This w
On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 02:20:11 GMT, Alexander Matveev
wrote:
>> - Added support for fragmented MP4 with HEVC/H.265, H.264 and AAC.
>> - Added support for elementary AAC streams without any container for audio
>> only streams.
>> - Added "aacparse" plugin from GStreamer. Required on Linux, sinc
> When the size of a ListCell is changed and a scrollTo method is invoked
> without having a layout calculation in between, the old (wrong) size is used
> to calculcate the total estimate. This happens e.g. when the size is changed
> in the `updateItem` method.
> This PR will immediately resize
On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 02:20:11 GMT, Alexander Matveev
wrote:
>> - Added support for fragmented MP4 with HEVC/H.265, H.264 and AAC.
>> - Added support for elementary AAC streams without any container for audio
>> only streams.
>> - Added "aacparse" plugin from GStreamer. Required on Linux, sinc
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 02:21:05 GMT, yosbits wrote:
> I think you are incorrect about the Null Safe explanation. Wouldn't using
> Optional solve this?
I'm not sure what you are trying to say, the fluent bindings offered by this
API are null safe. Using standard JavaFX you have to do additional w
On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 21:49:33 GMT, Nir Lisker wrote:
>> John Hendrikx has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Small wording change in API of ObservableValue after proof reading
>
> modules/javafx.base/src/main/java/javafx/beans/va
> This is an implementation of the proposal in
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8274771 that me and Nir Lisker
> (@nlisker) have been working on. It's a complete implementation including
> good test coverage.
>
> This was based on https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/434 but with a
15 matches
Mail list logo