Any of those options seem fine to me. Just have the "marketable" summary
link to the full table if they are not on the same page.
On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 6:24 PM Kevin Rushforth
wrote:
> I also like having both. We did something like this for JavaFX 11:
>
> https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/blob/ma
I also like having both. We did something like this for JavaFX 11:
https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/blob/master/doc-files/release-notes-11.md
with sections for "Important Changes", "New Features", "Known Issues",
etc., and the list of fixes and enhancements at the end.
We haven't done this for
Hi Nir,
I am very ok with that. I think we somehow need both. Currently, the
release notes that are also in the repository are a dry summary of the bug
fixes/features that have been added in this release. They are a 1-1
translation of the issues in JBS that are fixed in the given release. I
think
Reviving this, the JDK has a page for release notes [1] that makes it
easier for the developer to be updated on the changes. I think that we can
do something similar.
[1] https://www.oracle.com/java/technologies/javase/14-relnote-issues.html
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 2:56 PM Jeanette Winzenburg
wro
agree with better highlighting of the important changes/issues
disagree with leaving out the not so important - that's in the eye of
the reader, anyway - changes/issues: after all, the target readership
are technicians, not suits :)
-- Jeanette
Zitat von Nir Lisker :
Hi,
I posted the r
Hi,
I posted the release notes for OpenJFX 14 on Reddit. The top comment [1]
complained about the presentation. Maybe on openjfx.io the Release Notes
link could show a more "friendly" summary with a link to the detailed
table. I suggest:
1. Including only changes that matter to the users of the l
