OK, I filed a bug report with internal review ID 9052971. Interestingly,
merely calling sizeToScene explicitly (which shouldn't be necessary
though) fixes the bug at 125% and 150% but not at 175%. I added that
info to the report and the test program.
Thanks, Chris
On 2018-03-12 16:02, Kevin
Thanks. We'll take a look. It's possible this is related to other bugs
with initial sizing that were introduced with HiDPI spuport (although
that wouldn't explain the continued failure at 175%).
-- Kevin
Chris Nahr wrote:
OK, I filed a bug report with internal review ID 9052971.
Interestingl
Solved the configuration issues, so I'm continuing with this.
I submitted https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8199514 for the
refactoring part.
As for https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8089579, should it be
closed as Not an Issue and a new issue created for the new API propasal, or
sh
Nir Lisker wrote:
Solved the configuration issues, so I'm continuing with this.
I submitted https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8199514 for the
refactoring part.
As mentioned before, this seems OK long as the refactoring is
behavior-neutral and limited in scope.
As for https://bugs.
Hi,
Please review preliminary fix for:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8199514
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~nlisker/8199514/webrev.00/
Thanks,
Nir
I took a quick look and had one comment:
public class BooleanConditionBuilder2 extends
ConditionBuilder { ... }
As I understand it, you have added this as a possible refactoring for
BooleanConditionBuilder (but left the original in for comparison),
right? Since this would constitute a pub
>
> As I understand it, you have added this as a possible refactoring for
> BooleanConditionBuilder (but left the original in for comparison), right?
Yes. I took Boolean as an example to demonstrate the approach.
Since this would constitute a public API change, I don't think it should be
> done
Nir Lisker wrote:
As I understand it, you have added this as a possible refactoring
for BooleanConditionBuilder (but left the original in for
comparison), right?
Yes. I took Boolean as an example to demonstrate the approach.
Since this would constitute a public API change, I
How will these changes then be synchronized with the work Gluon is doing
for the version
distributed by them? Do they work on the same repo?
Am 12.03.18 um 23:25 schrieb Kevin Rushforth:
Hi Florian,
By way of update, after thinking about this for a week (and getting
some offline feedback), I
That will be a question for Gluon.
-- Kevin
Michael Paus wrote:
How will these changes then be synchronized with the work Gluon is
doing for the version
distributed by them? Do they work on the same repo?
Am 12.03.18 um 23:25 schrieb Kevin Rushforth:
Hi Florian,
By way of update, after thi
Hello,
I've proposed to work on a public API for binding.When that adds
capabilities for dynamic evaluation of the 'then' and 'otherwise'
arguments. Any comments?
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8199560
- Nir
11 matches
Mail list logo
