On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 13:34:04 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> I tested the patch, and it works for me (MacOS Catalina, 10.15.7)
>> I will look into more detail in the code, as I'm slightly worried about not
>> following the Apple conventions. From experience, this often leads to more
>> issues
This is a proposed fix for the bug where the Apple system menubar is initially
non-responsive on macOS 10.15 and later after a JavaFX application has started
up. The end user can workaround this by switching to some other application and
then back to the JavaFX app, but there is no known
On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 20:00:55 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> This is a proposed fix for the bug where the Apple system menubar is
> initially non-responsive on macOS 10.15 and later after a JavaFX application
> has started up. The end user can workaround this by switching to some other
>
On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 20:05:03 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> This is a proposed fix for the bug where the Apple system menubar is
>> initially non-responsive on macOS 10.15 and later after a JavaFX application
>> has started up. The end user can workaround this by switching to some other
>>
On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 21:06:10 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> I note that this does not seem to be a problem for Swing apps. AWT uses the
>> Java Runtime Support (JRS) framework to initialize the application and
>> menubar.
>
> Note to testers: `JFXPanel` applications deadlock with this fix. I
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 09:14:00 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
>> Note to testers: `JFXPanel` applications deadlock with this fix. I need to
>> check whether glass is being started up for a normal Taskbar application,
>> and not being embedded in an `FXCanvas` or `JFXPanel`.
>
> I tested the patch, and it
On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 20:00:55 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> This is a proposed fix for the bug where the Apple system menubar is
> initially non-responsive on macOS 10.15 and later after a JavaFX application
> has started up. The end user can workaround this by switching to some other
>
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 13:58:31 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> Thanks for checking. I'll remove the debug print statements, turn off
>> verbose logging, and send it out for review. I would appreciate a thorough
>> review of the code. Given the way JavaFX initializes the macOS application
>> and
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 16:23:47 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
>> This is a proposed fix for the bug where the Apple system menubar is
>> initially non-responsive on macOS 10.15 and later after a JavaFX application
>> has started up. The end user can workaround this by switching to some other
>>
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 16:39:59 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/java/com/sun/glass/ui/mac/MacApplication.java
>> line 142:
>>
>>> 140: @Override
>>> 141: protected void notifyDidBecomeActive() {
>>> 142: super.notifyDidBecomeActive();
>>
>> if an
> This is a proposed fix for the bug where the Apple system menubar is
> initially non-responsive on macOS 10.15 and later after a JavaFX application
> has started up. The end user can workaround this by switching to some other
> application and then back to the JavaFX app, but there is no
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 17:39:08 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> This is a proposed fix for the bug where the Apple system menubar is
>> initially non-responsive on macOS 10.15 and later after a JavaFX application
>> has started up. The end user can workaround this by switching to some other
>>
On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 20:00:55 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> This is a proposed fix for the bug where the Apple system menubar is
> initially non-responsive on macOS 10.15 and later after a JavaFX application
> has started up. The end user can workaround this by switching to some other
>
This fix was originally proposed by @mruzicka in PR #16 which was closed
several months ago without being integrated. At the time we didn't have a test
case that was failing.
While evaluating a bug that I filed,
[JDK-8235843](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8235843), I discovered
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 02:07:37 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> This fix was originally proposed by @mruzicka in PR #16 which was closed
> several months ago without being integrated. At the time we didn't have a
> test case that was failing.
>
> While evaluating a bug that I filed,
>
On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 04:29:13 GMT, Arun Joseph wrote:
> We should use the public_suffix_list.dat file in the JDK instead. Reading the
> public_suffix_list.dat file is modified to be similar to
>
16 matches
Mail list logo
