On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 23:00:05 GMT, Nir Lisker wrote:
>>> There is an outstanding API question regarding the direction vector: Should
>>> the transforms of the SpotLight node to scene coordinates affect the
>>> direction vector (e.g., such that a rotation would rotate the direction the
>>>
On Sun, 21 Mar 2021 17:48:10 GMT, Nir Lisker wrote:
> I would like to allow a developer to achieve a functionality like is shown in
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFgwZX5dkcM at 9:50. The rotations are
> intuitive there. If we allow both rotation transforms and a direction,
> wouldn't that
On Sun, 21 Mar 2021 17:48:10 GMT, Nir Lisker wrote:
>> Finally getting back to this.
>>
>> There is an outstanding API question regarding the direction vector: Should
>> the transforms of the SpotLight node to scene coordinates affect the
>> direction vector (e.g., such that a rotation would
> Added a SpotLight only to the D3D pipeline currently.
>
> ### API discussion points
>
> - [X] Added `SpotLight` as a subclass of `LightBase`. However, it could also
> be a subclass of `PointLight` as it's a point light with direction and extra
> factors. I saw that
I am informed that, for no reason given, the corporate IT folks will not
allow attachment upload.
Attempts over the years to persuade them otherwise have failed.
The best suggestion is you upload it somewhere else and include the link
in the bug report and
the Oracle reviewer can grab it.
This pull request adds dependency verification to the Gradle builds of JavaFX
on Linux, macOS, and Windows. It is the third of three changes that close the
gaps in the JavaFX build security:
* [JDK-8262236][1]: Configure Gradle checksum verification
* [JDK-8263204][2]: Add Gradle Wrapper
Thanks!
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 4:16 PM Nir Lisker wrote:
> The mailing lists are only for development and discussion purposes. If you
> think there's a bug or a missing feature you can ask here, but if you need
> help then there is no formal mailing list for that.
> If SO didn't help, you can
I had missed that as well. I'll close the bug I filed as a duplicate and
raise the priority of that bug.
-- Kevin
On 3/20/2021 11:54 AM, Philip Race wrote:
Ah, I missed that. And with that, I've now found Gary's bug :
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8239138
-phil.
On 3/20/21
> Fixing a memory leak.
> A node hard references its old parent after CSS layout and getting removed.
> This shouldn't be the case, this is very counterintuitive.
>
> The fix uses a WeakReference in CSSStyleHelper for firstStyleableAncestor.
> This should be fine because the CSS should only
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 14:35:58 GMT, Florian Kirmaier
wrote:
>> Below is a fix that I tried, It fixes the issue. The system test passed with
>> this change.
>> I was suggesting a solution like this where we can know exactly when to
>> `null` the reference. The change is not extensively tested
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 18:59:40 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote:
>> About whether we should use WeakReference here or not.
>>
>> It definitely falls into the exception for referring to the Parrent of a
>> Node. (Or to the Parent in a more abstract sense, I think it can also be the
>> parent of the
On Sun, 21 Mar 2021 22:30:11 GMT, Florian Kirmaier
wrote:
>> Fixing deadlock when calling Application.launch in the FXThread after
>> Platform.startup
>
> Florian Kirmaier has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> JDK-8263322
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
