> I don’t see that as a problem as new versions can be uploaded as
required.
Don't you think it would be an issue if Oracle decided to change the JAR
format from ZIP to something else?
I agree with the rest of your reply though.
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 1:16 PM August Nagro wrote:
> I wouldn't
Inline
> On Dec 10, 2018, at 2:16 PM, August Nagro wrote:
>
> I wouldn't recommend publishing JMOD files on maven central since the file
> format is not yet stable (based on zip currently, but ideally will change to
> better compression in the future). JMOD seems to be 'unfinished business'
I wouldn't recommend publishing JMOD files on maven central since the file
format is not yet stable (based on zip currently, but ideally will change
to better compression in the future). JMOD seems to be 'unfinished
business' from JPMS.
Ex,
Hi Johan,
I was in a similar situation for JNA (Java Native Access) and found,
that sonatype accepts other package types than jar/javadoc/sources.
To support opening JNI libraries, the native parts need to be packed
differently. This packaging is an "aar" (Android Archive). I did not
ask
