On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 19:14:08 GMT, Dell Green
wrote:
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8176499
>
> This pull request fixes a long standing issue in the MonocleTimer class
> whereby it has a dependency on the
> java.uti.Timer class which is dependent on system time a
On Fri, 1 May 2020 16:20:41 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> /integrate
>> /summary Fixes a long standing issue in the MonocleTimer class as its
>> dependent on the java.uti.Timer class which is
>> dependent on system time which can cause UI freezes depending upon how far
>> back in time the
On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 10:37:34 GMT, littlefreaky
wrote:
>>> I don't see any stray commits, so it looks like your branch is based off of
>>> master correctly.
>>>
>>> One thing I would ask you to change is that the title of this PR should
>>> exactly match the title of the JBS bug. So can you
On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 19:39:30 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> I don't see any stray commits, so it looks like your branch is based off of
>> master correctly.
>>
>> One thing I would ask you to change is that the title of this PR should
>> exactly match the title of the JBS bug. So can you
On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 19:14:08 GMT, Dell Green
wrote:
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8176499
>
> This pull request fixes a long standing issue in the MonocleTimer class
> whereby it has a dependency on the java.uti.Timer class which is dependent on
> system time a
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8176499
This pull request fixes a long standing issue in the MonocleTimer class whereby
it has a dependency on the java.uti.Timer class which is dependent on system
time and can cause UI freezes for seconds/minutes/hours/days/years dependent
upon how
On Sun, 17 Nov 2019 10:04:36 GMT, Dell Green
wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Nov 2019 17:51:56 GMT, John Neffenger
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 16 Nov 2019 06:09:35 GMT, Dell Green
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 16 Nov 2019 00:32:31 GMT, John Neffenger
>>> wrote:
>
The pull request has been updated with additional changes.
Added commits:
- 1f6e282d: changed from system propert debug logging to javafx platform logger
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/5/files
- new:
On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 21:34:06 GMT, John Neffenger
wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 12:03:42 GMT, Dell Green
> <12861109+dellgr...@users.noreply.github.com> wrote:
>
>> Often on embedded systems a cursor is not a valid input modality. On some of
>> these systems, when the
On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 19:57:04 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 11:31:18 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:10:32 GMT, Dell Green
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 09:53:28 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
>>>
&
On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 09:53:28 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 12:03:46 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 12:03:42 GMT, Dell Green
>> <12861109+dellgr...@users.noreply.github.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Often on embedded systems
Please review the fix for Add property to disable Monocle cursor:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8087980
https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/5
Please review the fix for Updated armv6hf crosslibs script with new
domains:
https://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=JDK-8231870
https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/8
Please review the fix for Add property to disable Monocle cursor:
https://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8087980
https://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8088412
https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/issues/489
https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/pull/493
, 1 de junho de 2019 19:18
Para: openjfx-dev at openjdk.java.net
Assunto: RE: Can Javafx cursor be disabled?
I don't think javafx supports framebuffer.
It might be working on gtk2, but will not work on gtk3 since the framebuffer
backend was removed from gdk.
So I suggest you move to X11.
___
disabled?
>
> I don't think javafx supports framebuffer.
>
> It might be working on gtk2, but will not work on gtk3 since the framebuffer
> backend was removed from gdk.
>
> So I suggest you move to X11.
>
> De: openjfx-dev em nome de Dell Green
Hi Guys,
I don't know if anyone has any ideas where to start with troubleshooting this
one, but currently we have an embedded product running oracle java 8 with
javafx. We are currently in the process of testing openjdk12+javaFx12.
Everything has been running fine, however we have just noticed
Please review the fix for The Bug Synopsis:
https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/pull/312
https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/issues/273
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8167068
fn3>: ***
[/home/dell/Documents/IwOpenJdk9/src/jdk9dev/build/linux-arm-normal-client-release/images/jre/bin/java]
Error 1
Images.gmk:144: recipe for target
'/home/dell/Documents/IwOpenJdk9/src/jdk9dev/build/linux-arm-normal-client-release/images/jre/bin/java'
failed
Dell Green
So
that from the zip and leaving the everything
else behind.
Once again apologies if the is functionality is now already available or coming
in java9 that I am not aware of.
Dell Green
R Software Manager
t: (+44)203 668 9870
206 Great Portland Street
London W1W 5QJ
Ideaworks (London) Ltd
people looking at the problem as well as I haven’t ruled
out yet that its a screen or display driver problem.
I wanted to rule out Java as the issue.
Dell Green
R Software Manager
t: (+44)203 668 9870
On 1 Apr 2016, at 22:14, Jim Graham <james.gra...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
the
anti-aliasing algorithm to us a grayscale anti-aliasing?
I have set all colors used in the applications to grayscale by calling
Color.grayscale()
Dell Green
R Software Manager
t: (+44)203 668 9870
206 Great Portland Street
London W1W 5QJ
Ideaworks (London) Ltd is a company registered
I am pretty sure that when i built an operating system for mx6 using yocto
project I had the option for it to spit out x11 versions of libegl.so libs
instead of framebuffer, although I was only interested in framebuffer option.
Dell Green
R Software Manager
t: (+44)203 668 9870
206 Great
st"
Am I doing something wrong? I have followed instructions as per the wiki apart
from installing QT 5.2 as don’t require webkit for my projects.
Dell Green
R Software Manager
t: (+44)203 668 9870
206 Great Portland Street
London W1W 5QJ
This email and any files transmitted with
so.6 => /usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libXau.so.6 (0xb5f48000)
libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libXdmcp.so.6 (0xb5f3c000)
libdatrie.so.1 => /usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libdatrie.so.1
(0xb5f2c000)
Dell Green
R Software Manager
t: (+44)203 668 9870
206 Great Port
est..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. OpenJFX armv6hf libjavafx_font_freetype.so x11 (Dell Green)
> 2. [9] Review request for JDK-8144789: Incorrect assertion fails
> in the GlassCursor.m (Morris Meyer)
> 3. Re: OpenJFX armv6hf libjavafx_font_freetype.so x11
OK great many thanks. I can wait a few days until your happy with your changes
and commit them. ☺
Dell Green
R Software Manager
t: (+44)203 668 9870
206 Great Portland Street
London W1W 5QJ
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use
27 matches
Mail list logo
