and Hindi).
Regards,
Itai.
On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 11:39 PM, Itai <itai...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think I have found two problems. The first, and probably most critical
> one, is that a new PangoFontMap is created for every call of
> PangoGlyphLayout#layout. It is not entirely clear
fallback chain Segoe UI -> Tahoma, which would
work?
Unfortunately I cannot test this by removing "Segoe UI Regular" as it is a
"protected system font", and so Windows won't allow me to delete it.
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Itai <itai...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As
s only available as part of Windows 8
> https://www.microsoft.com/typography/fonts/font.aspx?FMID=1945
>
> So perhaps it isn't compatible with DW on Windows 7.
>
> -phil
>
>
> On 11/26/2017 12:16 AM, Itai wrote:
>
>> I have recently come across a
Hermann - I believe this bug is due to a combination of Mesa and X.org - it
seems to be resolved by using Mesa>=13.0 *and* X.org>=1.18.4 . Since this
is a Linux-only bug, I don't think it's the same as the TransitionPath
jitter, as it reportedly happens on Windows as well.
On Sun, May 7, 2017 at
.
Is this likely to be backported? If not the whole focus-loss semantics,
maybe just making Spinners and ComboBoxes have consistent behavior?
Regards,
Itai.
hat I know would be wrong.
Regards,
Itai.
[1]: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-list/2005-April/msg00105.html
[2]: https://developer.gnome.org/programming-guidelines/stable/glist.html.en
On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 8:08 PM, Itai <itai...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you for the link, it's
as detailed a result as I can.
Regards,
Itai.
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 8:44 PM, Phil Race <philip.r...@oracle.com> wrote:
> You can't skip layout just because it is bidi ..
> where here you are apparently implicitly meaning Hebrew.
> This might be apparently working but may not a
to submit as a patch suggestion.
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Itai <itai...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for replying.
> I think I understand what you're saying about the cache. As for complexity
> - I'm mostly working with text which is only in Hebrew, which isn't complex
> as f
us a test case we could examine it too.
>
> If it were a real use case, then we'd move on to examine the feasibility
> of caching ...
>
> -phil.
>
>
>
> On 1/4/17, 9:19 AM, Itai wrote:
>
>> Recently JDK-8129582 [1] started really affecting me, with startup speed
it be
possible that this is the issue? How feasible would it be to have a layout
cache for complex runs, or at least non-complex BiDi runs?
Thanks,
Itai.
[1]: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8129582
,
Itai.
--- Utils.java 2016-12-09 16:10:01.660349512 +0200
+++ Utils-new.java 2016-12-09 15:47:52.157662974 +0200
@@ -466,7 +466,7 @@
if (orientation == NodeOrientation.RIGHT_TO_LEFT && hpos == HPos.CENTER) {
//TODO - testing for an instance of Stage seems wrong b
t, I think it may be a problem.
At the very least, perhaps clarify in the documentation of AnchorLocation
that its meaning differs from Pos etc.?
Thanks,
Itai.
[1]
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8125934?focusedCommentId=13767580=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpan
ssue.
>
> You can see the issue here https://github.com/
> asciidocfx/AsciidocFX/issues/227
>
> Thanks.
>
> 2016-07-21 2:38 GMT+03:00 Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>:
>
>> I'll add a comment to that effect (although our incident triage team is
>> g
d it
> as such. Based on the additional information you provided, I have reopened
> the bug and will ask someone on our team with a physical Linux setup to try
> to reproduce it.
>
> To answer your question, we are not aware of any such leaks.
>
> -- Kevin
>
>
>
> I
I'm experiencing multiple memory leaks with JavaFX on Linux, to the point
where I'm not sure which bug to report, as it seems like a systematic
issue.
The memory leak seems to be completely absent when using the software
renderer (-Dprism.order=sw), and does not seem to happen on Windows
15 matches
Mail list logo
