processors. It's more or less an honor thing, right, but we're
an honorable lot, LOL.
I buy my IDE. I buy other tools. That's all so I can use JavaFX. It
makes no economic sense to think this manna is always going to just
fall from heaven. Let's just all pony up and put our own futures
intentionally misleads the viewer. I leave it to the
reader to
judge what would be worst.
I am not going to make performance statements without numbers, but
my first
observations using JavaFX 11 with the Bellsoft Liberica VM are very
encouraging (see
https://gluonhq.com/javafx-11-early-access
We will review your report and have assigned it an internal review ID :
9057296.
hth...
On Tuesday, September 18, 2018 at 3:24 PM, Kevin Rushforth
wrote:
I really meant that when you file a bug at
https://bugreport.java.com/
you can paste it inline there, along with your description of
to even entertain the idea that this was not a subtle
programming mistake but instead a bug in JavaFX. I can't avoid writing
these so that you have to read the javadoc - you just have to read the
javadoc.
My experience tells me the brief versions were not easy to understand
so I'll post
of JavaFX 11 as well as
the
launch of a new OpenJFX community site at:
http://openjfx.io/
The GA version of JavaFX 11 is now live and can be downloaded by
going
to the openjfx.io site or by accessing javafx modules from maven
central
at openjfx:javafx-COMPONENT:11 (where COMPONENT is one of base
y versions of
this
program are available at . The javadoc is more copious, the bug is
manifested as an exception and the side effect of the bug are more
consequential.
This brief version cnosists of just two classes. Here is the JavaFX
Applica
available at . The javadoc is more copious, the bug is
manifested as an exception and the side effect of the bug are more
consequential.
This brief version cnosists of just two classes. Here is the JavaFX
Application class:
**
. As I said previously, more comprehensible and user-friendly
versions of this program are available at . The javadoc is more
copious, the bug is manifested as an exception and the side effect of
the bug are more consequential.
This brief version cnosists of just two classes. Here is the JavaFX
, September 7, 2018 at 8:37 PM, jav...@use.startmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I have a couple of very small apps (3 small classes in one case and 5
in another) which demonstrate that, under some circumstances, the
JavaFX Application Thread will recursively re-enter
EventHandler#handle().
So this means
Hi,
I have a couple of very small apps (3 small classes in one case and 5
in another) which demonstrate that, under some circumstances, the
JavaFX Application Thread will recursively re-enter
EventHandler#handle().
So this means that it is already in handle (and calls therefrom
I did not try Tom's build instructions however I can contribute that
having Cygwin on Windows 7 and following the build instructions as
posted on the JavaFX build instructions page is not suffcient to result
in a successful build.
The exact error messages I was receiving I posted earlier
Created a github page with a wiki anyone interested is invited to
join:
https://github.com/javafx-iness/master/wiki
I am interested to be able to do hit testing on Text for the purpose of
writing a rich text editor, among other things.
On Saturday, December 16, 2017 5:47 AM, Abossolo Foh
Sorry about all the typos previously.
Question- why not use the code in awt ? I am not totally up on what's
going on with the platforms' native rendering engines ( meaning, I have
no idea whatsoever) or how they have changed, but golly it sure does
still work pretty well.
At least it
but I can't get JavFX to build
and after a real, full week or trying, gave up for-ev-vah and moved on
to other stuff. I am going to leverage Swing for my Fontly needs and am
brushing of my C++ in case it JavaFX never does it and Oracle
(foolishly!!!) deprecates Swing at which point it's
, compare the class Font
found in javafx to the class Font found in java.awt .
java.awt's Font class, it's methods and the classes it references will
lead you straight into what the difference between the two libraries
are and what capabilities are absent in javafx.
Hi, This is a question about the future of Text under Javafx.
Very briefly, Swing provided access to everything a dev could need in
order to write a rich text editor from scratch. LineBreakMeasurers and
HitTesting and everything.
In JavaFX these things are not directly available to the dev
uot;WINSDK_DIR"))
>>>> and that system variable is, in fact, set as proved by (my)
running
>>>> this simple program I wrote (which exists in the same
directory as
>>>> win.gradle to exclude any conceivable path issues) and
getting the
>>>> proper outputp
(my)
running
>>>> this simple program I wrote (which exists in the same directory
as
>>>> win.gradle to exclude any conceivable path issues) and getting
the
>>>> proper outputpublic class WinSDK { public WinSDK() { } public
static
>>>> void main(String[] args) { String sdk =
>>&g
g any of the gradle scripts, (in my
instance gradle.win) ?
Seems like first -step level stuff that is done regularly by
everyone
on the list interested in improving or exploring OpenFX but maybe I
am
wrong about this?
Many thanks in advance.
On Thursday, September 28, 2017 6:59 PM, ja
list interested in improving or exploring OpenFX but maybe I
am
wrong about this?
Many thanks in advance.
On Thursday, September 28, 2017 6:59 PM, javafx@use.startmail.comwrote:
Hi All,
New member to this group. I am encountering a little trouble when
I
try to build O
Hi Chris,
I am on Windows 7 and WinSDK 7.0A and DirectX June 10, 2010; not sure
if any of that makes a difference here or not.
I cloned a couple weeks ago and in my win.gradle on line 68 it has a
hard coded absolute path thus:
defineProperty("WINDOWS_VS_VSINSTALLDIR", properties,
Hi again !
Well I was able to track down the source of the error I am receiving
from the gradle build. Unfortunately, the error persists, which is a
bit of a mystery. Maybe a gradle maven can enlighten me here.
For some reason, this line on line 90-91 of win.gradle is throwing the
Hi All,
New member to this group. I am encountering a little trouble when I
try to build OpenJFX. I am following the instructions here: (using
Cygwin on Win 7):
https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Building+OpenJFX
When I run gradle after cloning the OpenJFX repository, I get a
23 matches
Mail list logo
