Re: "Internal review ID : 9062887" (Re: FXMLLoader: not supplying filename to script engine, not supplying event object as argument to script

Hi Kevin, On 29.01.2020 13:24, Kevin Rushforth wrote: > The RFE you filed is now available here: > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8238080 thank you very much! Cheers ---rony P.S.: Have not received any automatic notification e-mail so far.

Re: "Internal review ID : 9062887" (Re: FXMLLoader: not supplying filename to script engine, not supplying event object as argument to script

Hi Rony, The RFE you filed is now available here: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8238080 -- Kevin On 1/25/2020 6:32 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: Hi Kevin, On 24.01.2020 16:50, Kevin Rushforth wrote: This bug was transferred to the JDK project on 28-Nov-2019. I don't know why

Re: "Internal review ID : 9062887" (Re: FXMLLoader: not supplying filename to script engine, not supplying event object as argument to script

Hi Kevin, On 24.01.2020 16:50, Kevin Rushforth wrote: > This bug was transferred to the JDK project on 28-Nov-2019. I don't know why > you didn't get an > email at that time, but I will inquire of the team who processes incoming > bugs. > > Also, I'll keep an eye out for the RFE you filed

Re: "Internal review ID : 9062887" (Re: FXMLLoader: not supplying filename to script engine, not supplying event object as argument to script

Hi Rony, This bug was transferred to the JDK project on 28-Nov-2019. I don't know why you didn't get an email at that time, but I will inquire of the team who processes incoming bugs. Also, I'll keep an eye out for the RFE you filed today, and let you know when it is transferred in case

Re: "Internal review ID : 9062887" (Re: FXMLLoader: not supplying filename to script engine, not supplying event object as argument to script

On 23.01.2020 18:09, Anthony Vanelverdinghe wrote: > On 22/01/2020 18:52, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: ... cut ... >> Maybe one more question: there would be an optimization possible by >> compiling scripts for script >> engines that have the javax.script.Compilable interface implemented and use >>

Re: "Internal review ID : 9062887" (Re: FXMLLoader: not supplying filename to script engine, not supplying event object as argument to script

On 22/01/2020 18:52, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: Hi Anthony, On 22.01.2020 17:07, Anthony Vanelverdinghe wrote: Your issue has been converted into a JDK issue, with your testcase attached [1]. Thank you *very* much for this information! Normally you should’ve received an e-mail at the time

Re: "Internal review ID : 9062887" (Re: FXMLLoader: not supplying filename to script engine, not supplying event object as argument to script

Hi Anthony, On 22.01.2020 17:07, Anthony Vanelverdinghe wrote: > Your issue has been converted into a JDK issue, with your testcase attached > [1]. Thank you *very* much for this information! > Normally you should’ve received an e-mail at the time of this conversion, Just searched all my

RE: "Internal review ID : 9062887" (Re: FXMLLoader: not supplying filename to script engine, not supplying event object as argument to script

enjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net> Subject: Re: "Internal review ID : 9062887" (Re: FXMLLoader: not supplying filename to script engine, not supplying event object as argument to script Last November I submitted an appropriate bug report and mailed the testcase on November 27th per Or

Re: "Internal review ID : 9062887" (Re: FXMLLoader: not supplying filename to script engine, not supplying event object as argument to script

Last November I submitted an appropriate bug report and mailed the testcase on November 27th per Oracle's request without hearing anything to this date. Therefore I was wondering how long such an assessment usually takes place and what to do? (Maybe it "fell off the desk" due to the end-of-year

Re: "Internal review ID : 9062887" (Re: FXMLLoader: not supplying filename to script engine, not supplying event object as argument to script

As the zip-archive attachment got stripped, for a brief time the zip-archive can be fetched from . ---rony On 21.11.2019 15:29, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > On 15.11.2019 16:08, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: >> On