On 04/05/2017 11:23 AM, David Hill wrote:
On 4/5/17, 12:52 PM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Okay. Thank you to you all!
The root cause why we need to add sync is a new way to grab/ungrab
focus used in the GTK3 glass implementation.
The GTK2 way to grab/ungrab is still applicable in GTK3 though
On 4/5/17, 12:52 PM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Okay. Thank you to you all!
The root cause why we need to add sync is a new way to grab/ungrab focus used
in the GTK3 glass implementation.
The GTK2 way to grab/ungrab is still applicable in GTK3 though it is
deprecated. But the used GTK3
Okay. Thank you to you all!
The root cause why we need to add sync is a new way to grab/ungrab focus
used in the GTK3 glass implementation.
The GTK2 way to grab/ungrab is still applicable in GTK3 though it is
deprecated. But the used GTK3 grab/ungrab is deprecated as well since
version 3.20
I raised the same concern in the JBS issue, especially for mouse and
keyboard events.
-- Kevin
Jim Graham wrote:
I don't think I was specifically involved in AWT fixes for that issue,
but the concerns that David raises are all valid and Phil correctly
points out that this is much worse in a
I don't think I was specifically involved in AWT fixes for that issue, but the concerns that David raises are all valid
and Phil correctly points out that this is much worse in a network display environment...
...jim
On 4/4/17 3:53 PM, Philip Race wrote:
AWT used to
AWT used to have really bad at X11 remote display and
it was looked at a few times and I think it was improved
noticeably when we could get rid of "round trip" requests.
I think Jim had a hand in some of that work.
So I am sure a round trip - or similar - is bad for performance.
If you want to
On 4/4/17, 1:27 PM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello Kevin & David,
Please review the fix for jfx9:
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8176844
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssadetsky/8176844/
--Semyon
Semyon,
I have been sitting here for a while thinking about adding
Sorry. The fix is for JFX *10*.
On 04/04/2017 10:27 AM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello Kevin & David,
Please review the fix for jfx9:
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8176844
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssadetsky/8176844/
--Semyon
Hello Kevin & David,
Please review the fix for jfx9:
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8176844
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssadetsky/8176844/
--Semyon
