On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 23:33:31 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> John Neffenger has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and previous
>> commits have been removed. The incremental
>> views will show differences compared to the previous content of the PR.
>
> Looks good to me.
> Below are
On Thu, 5 Dec 2019 00:06:21 GMT, John Neffenger
wrote:
> This pull request adds support for e-paper displays with the i.MX 6 Series of
> Applications Processors and implements
> [Issue #521](https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/issues/521) in the
> obsolete *javafxports/openjdk-jfx*
>
On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 19:11:19 GMT, John Neffenger
wrote:
>> This pull request adds support for e-paper displays with the i.MX 6 Series
>> of Applications Processors and implements
>> [Issue #521](https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/issues/521) in the
>> obsolete
On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 19:11:19 GMT, John Neffenger
wrote:
>> This pull request adds support for e-paper displays with the i.MX 6 Series
>> of Applications Processors and implements
>> [Issue #521](https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/issues/521) in the
>> obsolete
On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 15:14:19 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> I just checked and there is nothing wrong with your merge. But somehow it
> managed to confuse GitHub.
Thanks, Kevin. A simple `git rebase master` and `git push --force` did the
trick!
I hope it's okay for me to add some advocacy to
> This pull request adds support for e-paper displays with the i.MX 6 Series of
> Applications Processors and implements
> [Issue #521](https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/issues/521) in the
> obsolete *javafxports/openjdk-jfx*
> repository. Some of the changes were made to support the
On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 15:05:22 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> @kevinrushforth Did I merge the upstream master branch correctly? The [last
>> time I did
>> this](https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/pull/522/commits) on the
>> old *openjdk-jfx* repository, the pull
>> request showed only
On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 20:45:17 GMT, John Neffenger
wrote:
> Let me know if you would like me to rebase my changes and force push a
> cleaner update.
Yes, this is what you will need to do.
More than just being needed for a cleaner update, the PR lists 6,151 changed
files! Either the merge went
On Thu, 5 Dec 2019 00:14:34 GMT, John Neffenger
wrote:
>> This pull request adds support for e-paper displays with the i.MX 6 Series
>> of Applications Processors and implements
>> [Issue #521](https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/issues/521) in the
>> obsolete *javafxports/openjdk-jfx*
> This pull request adds support for e-paper displays with the i.MX 6 Series of
> Applications Processors and implements
> [Issue #521](https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/issues/521) in the
> obsolete *javafxports/openjdk-jfx*
> repository. Some of the changes were made to support the
This pull request adds support for e-paper displays with the i.MX 6 Series of
Applications Processors and implements [Issue
#521](https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/issues/521) in the obsolete
*javafxports/openjdk-jfx* repository. Some of the changes were made to support
the new device
On Thu, 5 Dec 2019 12:06:18 GMT, John Neffenger
wrote:
> This pull request adds support for e-paper displays with the i.MX 6 Series of
> Applications Processors and implements [Issue
> #521](https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/issues/521) in the obsolete
> *javafxports/openjdk-jfx*
12 matches
Mail list logo
