RE: [9] Review request for 8143894 : clipboard paste on outlook email body doesn't work for the first time

Hi Arunprasad, Alexander and Kevin, JBS : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8143894/ Webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~arapte/ghb/8143894/webrev.01/ (Due to permission bit corrupted to my g...@cr.openjdk.java.net account I am sending this patch from ~arapte account) Fix updated

Why there is no WebWorker like mechanism for JavaFX

I'm really enjoying developing apps in JavaFX, but I think there is a limitation point; When we think HTML5, there is WebWorker to run long-running tasks in another process. So, we know WebWorker has no DOM access, it is generally used computational needs. Ok, We can run long-running tasks in

Re: Why there is no WebWorker like mechanism for JavaFX

The JavaFX API offers Worker class for long running tasks. If you want to execute JavaScript code without DOM and JavaFX you can use the Nashorn JS Virtual machine, which is included in Java 8. I guess the Nashorn documentation also has examples how it's used with the Java scripting API. On Dec

Re: Why there is no WebWorker like mechanism for JavaFX

Yes your suggestion is OK in theory but in practice, Nashorn is too slow without Warmup. I can say Nashorn is 5x to 10x slower than embedded webkit to run script. 2015-12-08 15:09 GMT+02:00 Benjamin Gudehus : > The JavaFX API offers Worker class for long running tasks. > >

JDK-8090029: NullPointerException in DatePicker when a custom ButtonSkin is set - possible backport to JDK 8?

Hello, Since the shutdown of the official JavaFX Jira one has been unable to comment/discus ongoing or resolved bugs. So I've turned to this mailing list in hope that I came to the right place and if not please do point me in the right direction. I would like to request the backport of the

Re: JDK-8090029: NullPointerException in DatePicker when a custom ButtonSkin is set - possible backport to JDK 8?

In general, we will only backport to 8 fixes for critical bugs, regressions, and a few others with safe, simple fixes. This bug meets that criteria, so I have created a backport issue for it. -- Kevin Boström Kacper wrote: Hello, Since the shutdown of the official JavaFX Jira one has been

OpenJFX armv6hf libjavafx_font_freetype.so x11

Hi Guys, Is it correct that “libjavafx_font_freetype.so” be linked against X libraries? as our embedded guys who are running without X were surprised to see this as they are running without X using monocle and frame buffer platforms on raspberry pi and MX6? Do we meet to install X11 if

[9] Review request for 8144922: [packager] intermittent test failures

Chris, Please review the following fix https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8144922 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcherepanov/8144922/webrev.v0/ Thanks, Dmitry

[9] Review request for JDK-8144789: Incorrect assertion fails in the GlassCursor.m

Vadim and Kevin, Please review this fix for the GlassCursor.m assertion failure. Thanks, --morris WEBREV - http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~morris/JDK-8144780.01a BUG - https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8144780

Re: OpenJFX armv6hf libjavafx_font_freetype.so x11

On 12/8/15, 9:25 AM, Dell Green wrote: Hi Guys, Is it correct that “libjavafx_font_freetype.so” be linked against X libraries? as our embedded guys who are running without X were surprised to see this as they are running without X using monocle and frame buffer platforms on raspberry pi

Re: Why there is no WebWorker like mechanism for JavaFX

Let's bring this back on the list - i once more accidentally replied just to you. IMHO if you want to execute javascript which is not related to a browser/html you should run that in a javascript vm like nashorn, ... and not through the WebView. Tom On 08.12.15 15:39, Rahman USTA wrote: > I

Re: Future of JavaFX

I'm pretty surprised by this thread. Guys, JavaFX is a widget toolkit. That's it, that's all it is. GUIs haven't changed that much in their general design and capabilities for decades now, probably the last major 'innovations' being things like the MS Office Ribbon. JFX has all the capabilities

Re: OpenJFX armv6hf libjavafx_font_freetype.so x11

great, many thanks, is it a correct assumption that if running javafx on embedded platform using monocle and framebuffer platforms (i.e no x11)  if we run pmap on our Java process then we shouldn't see any linking to X related libraries? On 8 Dec 2015 19:55,

Re: OpenJFX armv6hf libjavafx_font_freetype.so x11

On 12/8/15, 3:15 PM, Dell Green wrote: great, many thanks, is it a correct assumption that if running javafx on embedded platform using monocle and framebuffer platforms (i.e no x11) if we run pmap on our Java process then we shouldn't see any linking to X related libraries? When my

Code Review Request For JDK-8091170: Compile-time warnings in prism-es2 code

Hi Kevin, Please review the proposed fix which was moved from JDK-8090866 as per our conversation: JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8091170 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8091170/webrev.00/ Thanks, - Chien

Re: OpenJFX armv6hf libjavafx_font_freetype.so x11

OK great many thanks. I can wait a few days until your happy with your changes and commit them. ☺ Dell Green R Software Manager t: (+44)203 668 9870 206 Great Portland Street London W1W 5QJ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of

RE: [9] Review request for 8143894 : clipboard paste on outlook email body doesn't work for the first time

Fixed Test failure on MAC Webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ghb/8143894/webrev.02/ Tested on Windows , Linux and Mac Thanks, Guru -Original Message- From: Guru Hb Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 4:08 PM To: Arunprasad Rajkumar; Alexander Zvegintsev; Kevin Rushforth Cc: