Hi,
Please review below fix.
Bug : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8185854
Fix : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aghaisas/fx/8185854/webrev.0/
Request you to review.
Regards,
Ajit
Any further comments on this? If not, then I propose we start using the
JBS label:
github-bug
To identify JBS issues that are linked to guthub issues and/or PRs
-- Kevin
Nir Lisker wrote:
I think that the labels should be succinct, so one label should suffice.
Either github-link or githu
+1
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 3:30 PM Kevin Rushforth
wrote:
> Any further comments on this? If not, then I propose we start using the
> JBS label:
>
> github-bug
>
> To identify JBS issues that are linked to guthub issues and/or PRs
>
> -- Kevin
>
>
> Nir Lisker wrote:
> > I think that the labe
Hi all, (first post).
I was profiling our PROD JavaFX application recently I discovered something
rather peculiar in the CSSParser. (jdk1.8.0_151)
I noticed several hundred IllegalArgumentExceptions on the
JavaApplicationThread where for various unrelated css properties the
CSSParser is trying to
The parser doesn't have any concept of what the property is or value it
might have. This allows the addition of new properties (such as an user
might add for their own CSS styles) without having to modify the parser
to handle them.
On 4/4/18 10:03 AM, Matthew Elliot wrote:
Hi all, (first pos
Hi David, thanks for the quick response, the parser does seem to have
knowledge of the property and values as in the method ...
ParsedValueImpl valueFor(String property, Term root, CSSLexer lexer)
throws ParseException {}
it looks for particular properties for parsing... e.g.
} else if ("-fx-bac
On 4/4/18 10:44 AM, Matthew Elliot wrote:
Hi David, thanks for the quick response, the parser does seem to have
knowledge of the property and values as in the method ...
ParsedValueImpl valueFor(String property, Term root, CSSLexer lexer)throws
ParseException {}
it looks for particular propert
Hey David, thanks.
I have filed a bug via the Oracle website.
internal review ID : 9053225
Hopefully this was correct as it was also my first time.
Matt
On 4 April 2018 at 17:21, David Grieve wrote:
> On 4/4/18 10:44 AM, Matthew Elliot wrote:
>
> Hi David, thanks for the quick response, the p
Hi Matt,
Thank you for filing this bug.
Can you provide a standalone test case that reproduces this (a .java and
a .css file), so we can attach it to the bug? Our WebBugs triage
engineer will ask for this, and it will save time if you can provide it
now. Otherwise the bug report looks fine.
github-bug is fine by me. What about external links, name them or leave
them as URLs?
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018, 16:43 Johan Vos wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 3:30 PM Kevin Rushforth
> wrote:
>
>> Any further comments on this? If not, then I propose we start using the
>> JBS label:
>>
>>
I don't have a strong preference. The URL contains either "issue" or
"pull" already, so there should be no confusion if we just use the URL.
-- Kevin
Nir Lisker wrote:
github-bug is fine by me. What about external links, name them or
leave them as URLs?
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018, 16:43 Johan Vos
I'd say position, size, color, etc are all part of the design and CSS is
about design so this type of properties should be accessible via CSS.
I don't see why JavaFX should be any different from the web CSS, in this
respect.
There's something I'd like to bring to your attention, we already have
I'm running :web:test in revision 10889 and getting the following failing
test:
test.javafx.scene.web.MiscellaneousTest > testUserAgentString FAILED
java.lang.AssertionError: UserAgentString does not contain JavaFX/11
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:91)
at org.junit.Assert
I don't see any opinions, so should I investigate option 2?
- Nir
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 4:36 AM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Breaking existing apps is the one thing I worried about with the
> suggestion of doing it without API changes. So to summarize I think there
> are three possiblities:
>
>
Hi Lisker,
Can you print the value of useragentString ? Looks like you are using
fxversion as 11 (you can print this value from
System.getProperty("javafx.runtime.version");) but the useragentstring does not
contain 11.
final WebView webView = new WebView();
final WebEngine webEngine = webV
Vote: Yes
-Original Message-
From: Guru
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2018 2:12 PM
To: Kevin Rushforth
Cc: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: CFV: New OpenJFX Committer: Rajath Kamath
Vote: YES
> On 29-Mar-2018, at 10:12 PM, Kevin Rushforth
> wrote:
>
> I hereby nominate Rajath Ka
Hi Lisker,
+one more point:
I think you are not compiling webkit . The command "gradle :web:test" picks
the webkit dll from JDK (which can have older versions like 10 / 9) .
You can compile webkit with command " gradle -PCOMPILE_WEBKIT=true :web:test"
and in this case webkit dll will be pic
17 matches
Mail list logo