Getting started with JavaFX is made overly complicated by the fact that
the use of the
module system is enforced by some code in the JDK. Especially for
beginners, who just
want to get some small program running, this is almost always a big
source of frustration.
It is not very good marketing
On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 10:38:06 GMT, Ajit Ghaisas wrote:
>> Craig Cavanaugh has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Update unit test for JDK_8129123 to check midpoint of the list
>
>
Hi,
I would just like to add that many of the problems you have cited would
just vanish if the JPMS
enforcement would be removed from the JDK. There would be no "JavaFX
requiring absurd
runtime module VM arguments" anymore and the IDE integration would just
be straight forward.
JavaFX would
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8129123
>
> This pull request fixes JDK-8129123. This bug also effects Windows and Linux
> platforms.
> Also, I believe JDK-8196037 is a duplicate of this issue.
>
> I've tested this against OpenJDK 11.0.6 on Ubuntu 18.04, Arch Linux and
> Windows 10.
On 4/18/20 5:01 AM, Michael Paus wrote:
Getting started with JavaFX is made overly complicated by the fact
that the use of the
module system is enforced by some code in the JDK. Especially for
beginners, who just
want to get some small program running, this is almost always a big
source of
On 4/18/20 5:01 AM, Michael Paus wrote:
> Getting started with JavaFX is made overly complicated by the fact
> that the use of the module system is enforced by some code in the
> JDK. Especially for beginners, who just want to get some small
> program running, this is almost always a big source of
On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 03:55:37 GMT, yosbits
wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I couldn't find you listed at
>> https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/community/oca-486395.html . Please send
>> me an e-mail
>> at dalibor.to...@oracle.com with information about your OCA, so that I can
>> look it up.
>
> My name is
Yep, that's where I downloaded it from.
> PS C:\Users\cmiles\source\repos\xmltool> java --version
> openjdk 14.0.1 2020-04-14
> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 14.0.1+7)
> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 14.0.1+7, mixed mode, sharing)
When I look at the "bin" directory that came with the
SVGTest.testSVGRenderingWithPattern is failing frequently due to
[JDK-8243110](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8243110). We should skip
this test until it is fixed.
-
Commit messages:
- 8243112: Skip failing test SVGTest.testSVGRenderingWithPattern
Changes:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 17:38:17 GMT, Arun Joseph wrote:
> SVGTest.testSVGRenderingWithPattern is failing frequently due to
> [JDK-8243110](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8243110). We should
> skip this test until it is fixed.
Marked as reviewed by kcr (Lead).
-
PR:
Hi Christopher,
I do not know what your specific problem is but maybe you just have to
shift your goals a little bit.
Continuing like you did in the Java 8 days is not a good idea for
various reasons. The current trend
for distributing desktop software with Java is to build a platform
specific
On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 16:02:12 GMT, Nir Lisker wrote:
>> Conclusion: The new shaders that support attenuation don't seem to have much
>> of a performance impact on machines with
>> an Intel HD, but on systems with a graphics accelerator, it is a significant
>> slowdown.
>> So we are left with
On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 09:58:27 GMT, Jesper Skov
wrote:
> Make the two ways of associating a ToggleButton with a ToggleGroup interact
> correctly.
>
> This fixes https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8198402
The fix looks correct to me. Have you run all tests to ensure no regressions?
I left
On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 15:52:36 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
>> This is a compiler upgrade on Linux from the current gcc 8.3 compiler to gcc
>> 9.2. This will match a recent upgrade done
>> for JDK 15 -- see
>> [JDK-8241721](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8241721).
>> On a related note, using
I'm in the process of porting an app from Java 8 to Java 11. Just getting it to
run in classpath mode is not that hard anymore; upgrade a bunch of libraries
and you're set.
As an experiment I'm now activating JPMS. Right! What a lot of work! Do you
have any idea how many fairly common
I have built both non-modular and modular JavaFX apps in the past five years,
and I agree that bootstrapping a modular Hello World JavaFX application is not
as trivial as bootstrapping a non-modular one.
The big challenges are related to the JPMS. These challenges are not unique to
JavaFX.
On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 10:00:49 GMT, Jesper Skov
wrote:
>> Make the two ways of associating a ToggleButton with a ToggleGroup interact
>> correctly.
>>
>> This fixes https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8198402
>
> /signed
@arapte can you also review?
-
PR:
> If there are many columns, the current TableView will stall scrolling.
> Resolving this performance issue requires column
> virtualization. Virtualization mode is enabled when the row height is fixed
> by the following method.
> `tableView.setFixedCellSize(height)`
>
> This proposal includes
On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 10:42:30 GMT, Jeanette Winzenburg
wrote:
>> I think, selection and scrolling are two separate operations. Here we use
>> these two operations to achieve the desired
>> result for ComboBox. It is nice to have behavior and I am OK with the fix.
>>> Also, I believe
On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 16:12:38 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> This is a compiler upgrade on Linux from the current gcc 8.3 compiler to gcc
> 9.2. This will match a recent upgrade done
> for JDK 15 -- see
> [JDK-8241721](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8241721).
> On a related note, using
Michael,
I completely agree with you. I am Professor at a community college (NHTI) and
teach entry level courses to students who have just graduated from high school.
About a year ago (JDK 8 to 11), I started including Java FX in my Java course,
but after that I had to remove it (JDK > 11.03) as
21 matches
Mail list logo
