Re: Java Web Start UI in JDK 8.0

2014-02-25 Thread Joe McGlynn
Hi Scott,

The issue with multiple javaws versions (and one failing) should be reported 
through the main bug tracking system at bugs.java.com.  I’ve attached the image 
to the bug report against FX.


-- 



On Feb 25, 2014, at 4:34 AM, Scott Palmer  wrote:

> For the record, I discovered this when I encountered this bug
> https://netbeans.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241970
> 
> Which looks like it isn't a NetBeans bug, but some problem with the JDK.  
> Should that be reported in the JavaFX JIRA, or the main Java bug reporter at 
> oracle.com?
> 
> Scott
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Scott Palmer  wrote:
> Attachments aren't allowed for us outsiders. Here is what I'm seeing, please 
> attach it:
> 
>  
> 
> Note also the double scrollbar and tiny window for the error details.  That 
> was to be my second report.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Scott
> 
> 
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Joe McGlynn  wrote:
> The dialogs for deployment (applets and web start) that are done in Java have 
> parallel implementations in both FX and Swing.  If it’s launching an FX app 
> we use FX dialogs (and the reverse) to avoid loading both UI stacks 
> unnecessarily.  
> 
> Can you add a screen shot to the bug so we can see what you’re reporting 
> please?
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> On Feb 24, 2014, at 8:30 PM, Scott Palmer  wrote:
> 
>> Is my suspicion correct that Java Web Start UI in Java 8 is done with Java
>> FX?
>> 
>> I just filed an issue in JIRA against the "deployment" component:
>> https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-36003
>> 
>> and I wonder if that is the right place for it?
>> 
>> (I was about to file another)
>> 
>> Scott
> 
> 
> 



Re: Java Web Start UI in JDK 8.0

2014-02-25 Thread Joe McGlynn
Hi Scott,

The issue with multiple javaws versions (and one failing) should be reported 
through the main bug tracking system at bugs.java.com.  I’ve attached the image 
to the bug report against FX.


-- 



On Feb 25, 2014, at 4:34 AM, Scott Palmer  wrote:

> For the record, I discovered this when I encountered this bug
> https://netbeans.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241970
> 
> Which looks like it isn't a NetBeans bug, but some problem with the JDK.  
> Should that be reported in the JavaFX JIRA, or the main Java bug reporter at 
> oracle.com?
> 
> Scott
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Scott Palmer  wrote:
> Attachments aren't allowed for us outsiders. Here is what I'm seeing, please 
> attach it:
> 
>  
> 
> Note also the double scrollbar and tiny window for the error details.  That 
> was to be my second report.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Scott
> 
> 
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Joe McGlynn  wrote:
> The dialogs for deployment (applets and web start) that are done in Java have 
> parallel implementations in both FX and Swing.  If it’s launching an FX app 
> we use FX dialogs (and the reverse) to avoid loading both UI stacks 
> unnecessarily.  
> 
> Can you add a screen shot to the bug so we can see what you’re reporting 
> please?
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> On Feb 24, 2014, at 8:30 PM, Scott Palmer  wrote:
> 
>> Is my suspicion correct that Java Web Start UI in Java 8 is done with Java
>> FX?
>> 
>> I just filed an issue in JIRA against the "deployment" component:
>> https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-36003
>> 
>> and I wonder if that is the right place for it?
>> 
>> (I was about to file another)
>> 
>> Scott
> 
> 
> 



Re: Java Web Start UI in JDK 8.0

2014-02-24 Thread Joe McGlynn
The dialogs for deployment (applets and web start) that are done in Java have 
parallel implementations in both FX and Swing.  If it’s launching an FX app we 
use FX dialogs (and the reverse) to avoid loading both UI stacks unnecessarily. 
 

Can you add a screen shot to the bug so we can see what you’re reporting please?


-- 

On Feb 24, 2014, at 8:30 PM, Scott Palmer  wrote:

> Is my suspicion correct that Java Web Start UI in Java 8 is done with Java
> FX?
> 
> I just filed an issue in JIRA against the "deployment" component:
> https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-36003
> 
> and I wonder if that is the right place for it?
> 
> (I was about to file another)
> 
> Scott