Re: Update on enabling JavaFX to work with OpenJDK builds

This seems reasonable to me as well: integrating the JavaFX modules into whatever dependency manager you are using seems like a good thing. -- Kevin Johan Vos wrote: Hi Michael, The second question is what I think should be the default. This is similar to Java EE ^^^ EE4J Jakarta

Re: Update on enabling JavaFX to work with OpenJDK builds

I think this feature would be nice to have but I doubt that it is simple to achieve because JavaFX may or may not already be included in the JDK against which you build and on which your project later runs. There needs to be a strategy how to handle all the resulting corner cases. Am 28.02.18

Re: Update on enabling JavaFX to work with OpenJDK builds

Hi Kevin, thank you for the update. I appreciate this work very much because I think it is utterly important for JavaFX. While reading the past messages again I was wondering whether this will also address the following two questions. 1. Will there be a way to determine at program start-up

Re: Update on enabling JavaFX to work with OpenJDK builds

"I mentioned our intention to make it easier for OpenJFX to be built, tested, and run with OpenJDK builds that don't already contain javafx.* modules." +1 Great

Re: Update on enabling JavaFX to work with OpenJDK builds

On 2018-02-27T13:21:56 -0800 Kevin Rushforth wrote: > > In an earlier email with the subject "javafx might not be present" [1], > I mentioned our intention to make it easier for OpenJFX to be built, > tested, and run with OpenJDK builds that don't already contain