Re: Debian Squeeze: Slapd subtree disappears, but ldapsearch finds it | unable to allocate memory for mutex; resize mutex region

2013-05-02 Thread Denny Schierz
hi, Am 01.05.2013 um 23:08 schrieb Quanah Gibson-Mount qua...@zimbra.com: --On Wednesday, May 01, 2013 3:59 PM -0400 Christopher Wood christopher_w...@pobox.com wrote: How do people with generic sysadmin skills figure out which packaged components are safe to use with a

Re: Need help to configure OpenLDAP!!

2013-05-02 Thread Dieter Klünter
Am Wed, 1 May 2013 21:30:31 +0530 schrieb pradyumna dash neomatrix...@gmail.com: Hi, Am facing an issue while configuring OpenLDAP. My suffix looks like below in the *slapd.conf* file and apart from the default schema i have used ppolicy. databasebdb suffix

ACL on create questions

2013-05-02 Thread Emmanuel Dreyfus
HI Two ACL questions: 1) Is it possible to allow entry creation on a branch while preventing renaming? I understand I need to give write access to - attrs=chidren on parent - attrs=entry on created entry - attrs=the mandatory attributes for object Last item include the attributes used for RHS

How to configure ubuntu server with LDAP group based authentication

2013-05-02 Thread Geo P.C.
By installing libnss-ldap we are able to integrate an Ubuntu server with ldap (openldap). But we are unable to configure ldap group based authentication. We need to configure in such a way that user from a particular group need only to login. Please let me know is it possible configure it and

Re: Need help to configure OpenLDAP!!

2013-05-02 Thread Pradyumna
Hi, Thank you so much .. Fixed the issue as suggested. Regards, /Neo Sent from my iPhone On 02-May-2013, at 12:26 PM, Dieter Klünter die...@dkluenter.de wrote: Am Wed, 1 May 2013 21:30:31 +0530 schrieb pradyumna dash neomatrix...@gmail.com: Hi, Am facing an issue while configuring

Re: How to configure ubuntu server with LDAP group based authentication

2013-05-02 Thread Philip Colmer
This is how I've done it: Edit /etc/pam.d/sshd and uncomment account required pam_access.so Edit /etc/security/access.conf and add this line at the bottom: -:ALL EXCEPT root sysadmin ubuntu (name of ssh group):ALL The group can be an LDAP group. Users will still authenticate but they

Re: How to configure ubuntu server with LDAP group based authentication

2013-05-02 Thread Dieter Klünter
Am Thu, 2 May 2013 14:16:55 +0530 schrieb Geo P.C. pcge...@gmail.com: By installing libnss-ldap we are able to integrate an Ubuntu server with ldap (openldap). But we are unable to configure ldap group based authentication. We need to configure in such a way that user from a particular

Re: How to configure ubuntu server with LDAP group based authentication

2013-05-02 Thread Geo P.C.
Dear Philip Its working perfectly fine. Thanks... *Thanks Regards Geo P.C. www.geopc.co.cc* On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Philip Colmer philip.col...@linaro.orgwrote: This is how I've done it: Edit /etc/pam.d/sshd and uncomment account required pam_access.so Edit

Use LDAP netgroup to control NFS exports?

2013-05-02 Thread jupiter
Hi, I am running LDAP server and NFS server on CentOS 6, is it true that LDAP can be used to control NFS exports authentication, uid and gid setting without needing to specifie client IP addresses , anonuid and anongid on NFS exports file? I saw some sample such as to define /tmp/nfs2

Re: Debian Squeeze: Slapd subtree disappears, but ldapsearch finds it | unable to allocate memory for mutex; resize mutex region

2013-05-02 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Thursday, May 02, 2013 8:32 AM +0200 Denny Schierz linuxm...@4lin.net wrote: but than you have to download, patch and update security fixes by your self. Yep. Part of being a competent sys admin anyhow. I have now build Openldap 2.4.35 with the system libs. In a few weeks Wheezy is

Re: Debian Squeeze: Slapd subtree disappears, but ldapsearch finds it | unable to allocate memory for mutex; resize mutex region

2013-05-02 Thread Simone Piccardi
On 05/02/2013 04:08 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: --On Thursday, May 02, 2013 8:32 AM +0200 Denny Schierz linuxm...@4lin.net wrote: but than you have to download, patch and update security fixes by your self. Yep. Part of being a competent sys admin anyhow. Sorry, I disagree. A competent

Re: Debian Squeeze: Slapd subtree disappears, but ldapsearch finds it | unable to allocate memory for mutex; resize mutex region

2013-05-02 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Thursday, May 02, 2013 5:52 PM +0200 Simone Piccardi picca...@truelite.it wrote: On 05/02/2013 04:08 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: --On Thursday, May 02, 2013 8:32 AM +0200 Denny Schierz linuxm...@4lin.net wrote: but than you have to download, patch and update security fixes by your

Re: Debian Squeeze: Slapd subtree disappears, but ldapsearch finds it | unable to allocate memory for mutex; resize mutex region

2013-05-02 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Thursday, May 02, 2013 5:52 PM +0200 Simone Piccardi picca...@truelite.it wrote: I'm sorry to hear that Debian OpenLDAP packages are in a such bad state, but if, as it seems, there no distribution getting OpenLDAP right (I heard complaints also about RedHat), then I start thinking that

Re: Debian Squeeze: Slapd subtree disappears, but ldapsearch finds it | unable to allocate memory for mutex; resize mutex region

2013-05-02 Thread Howard Chu
Simone Piccardi wrote: On 05/02/2013 04:08 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: --On Thursday, May 02, 2013 8:32 AM +0200 Denny Schierz linuxm...@4lin.net wrote: but than you have to download, patch and update security fixes by your self. Yep. Part of being a competent sys admin anyhow. Sorry, I

Re: Debian Squeeze: Slapd subtree disappears, but ldapsearch finds it | unable to allocate memory for mutex; resize mutex region

2013-05-02 Thread David Blank-Edelman
Hi Quanah- On May 2, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount qua...@zimbra.com wrote: The OpenLDAP foundation has zero input or control into how distribution providers build their OpenLDAP packages. Thus the end users are at the mercy of the distribution provider's decisions on building

Re: Debian Squeeze: Slapd subtree disappears, but ldapsearch finds it | unable to allocate memory for mutex; resize mutex region

2013-05-02 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Thursday, May 02, 2013 12:35 PM -0400 David Blank-Edelman d...@ccs.neu.edu wrote: Yes, it is a big bummer. Has the OpenLDAP foundation ever considered publishing any official guidelines that could be used both by these distributions and individuals who want to do their own packages? Just

Re: Debian Squeeze: Slapd subtree disappears, but ldapsearch finds it | unable to allocate memory for mutex; resize mutex region

2013-05-02 Thread David Blank-Edelman
On May 2, 2013, at 12:53 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount qua...@zimbra.com wrote: The distribution maintainers are quite aware of the objections to the way in which they build their software. Their decisions have little to do with needs of the end users. Ok, then perhaps guidelines for the rest

Re: ACL on create questions

2013-05-02 Thread Andrew Findlay
[ Keep copying to the openldap-technical@openldap.org list ] On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 02:15:02PM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: It almost works. My only concern is that it is possible to create an object where LHS of DN is not in object's attributes. Like this: dn: foo=x,o=org objectClass:

Re: Debian Squeeze: Slapd subtree disappears, but ldapsearch finds it | unable to allocate memory for mutex; resize mutex region

2013-05-02 Thread Simone Piccardi
On 05/02/2013 06:10 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: Sorry, as someone who used to maintain some 600 servers for a major university running a very wide variety of services, I disagree. If you can't figure out an easy way to build and distribute your own packages in an automated fashion, you are

Re: Chaining stops working after slapd restart

2013-05-02 Thread Ivan Nejgebauer
On 30.04.2013. 17:09, jeevan kc wrote: Thanks for checking on 2.4.35 . Is there any way to fix the chaining overlay so it works even after restarting the slapd. I need to initiate a password policy for the directory but the chaining needs to be there for it to take effect. Any help / suggestion

Re: Debian Squeeze: Slapd subtree disappears, but ldapsearch finds it | unable to allocate memory for mutex; resize mutex region

2013-05-02 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Thursday, May 02, 2013 8:18 PM +0200 Simone Piccardi picca...@truelite.it wrote: On 05/02/2013 06:10 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: Sorry, as someone who used to maintain some 600 servers for a major university running a very wide variety of services, I disagree. If you can't figure out

Re: Debian Squeeze: Slapd subtree disappears, but ldapsearch finds it | unable to allocate memory for mutex; resize mutex region

2013-05-02 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Thursday, May 02, 2013 12:58 PM -0400 David Blank-Edelman d...@ccs.neu.edu wrote: On May 2, 2013, at 12:53 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount qua...@zimbra.com wrote: The distribution maintainers are quite aware of the objections to the way in which they build their software. Their decisions

Re: Debian Squeeze: Slapd subtree disappears, but ldapsearch finds it | unable to allocate memory for mutex; resize mutex region

2013-05-02 Thread dnb
On May 2, 2013, at 4:53 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount qua...@zimbra.com wrote: There is not a whole lot to it. a) Link to OpenSSL, not gnutls (debian/ubuntu default) or NSS (rhel default) b) If you are going to use BDB as your underlying database software and are on Linux, make sure to pass

Re: Debian Squeeze: Slapd subtree disappears, but ldapsearch finds it | unable to allocate memory for mutex; resize mutex region

2013-05-02 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Thursday, May 02, 2013 5:09 PM -0400 d...@ccs.neu.edu wrote: That's great information, thanks. Anything special if you plan to use MDB? I would use the current RE24 source to pick up some fixes since 2.4.35. It's finally been stable for me with that in place. You may or may not want

Re: ACL on create questions

2013-05-02 Thread Emmanuel Dreyfus
Andrew Findlay andrew.find...@skills-1st.co.uk wrote: Which version of slapd are you using? When I try this on 2.4.35 the extra value from the RDN gets copied into the entry so although the LDIF being loaded is not strictly correct it does result in a conformant entry. What does your entry