On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 15:02 -0400, Jeff Gehlbach wrote:
> On Sep 22, 2008, at 11:54 AM, Alex Bennee wrote:
>
> > I'm trying out a re-base of my changes on the latest SVN
>
> Which branch? Trunk? 1.6-testing? 1.6?
1.6
> > That path looks rather bogus. Has the build failed in some interesting
Looks like there was a merge problem... we'll look into it.
Matt
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 4:54 AM, Alex Bennee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 15:02 -0400, Jeff Gehlbach wrote:
> > On Sep 22, 2008, at 11:54 AM, Alex Bennee wrote:
> >
> > > I'm trying out a re-base of my changes
Ok.. this should be resolved in 1.6 release branch in revision 10628
Matt
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Matt Brozowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks like there was a merge problem... we'll look into it.
>
> Matt
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 4:54 AM, Alex Bennee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi at all,
i have read about a critical update for Postgresql
http://www.postgresql.org/about/news.1003
The description has some awful behaviors like:
"As some of these issues carry a risk of data loss, administrators of
production applications s
Ronny Trommer wrote:
> Hi at all,
>
> i have read about a critical update for Postgresql
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/news.1003
>
> The description has some awful behaviors like:
>
> "As some of these issues carry a risk of data loss, administrators of
> production applications should up
Hi,
I'm writing a test where I need to test that a method *isn't* called
(testing scheduled outages). Is there an EasyMock way of doing that? I've
looked, but no methods jump out at me.
Any suggestions?
:
I've tried creating my own custom implementation of the interface in question
