Hi,
I am sorry if this the wrong place for this kind of help request.
I am using Openocd (latest version from git) to program my imote2 sensor
via an Amontec JTAG-tiny. To configure and build openocd I use the
following commands:
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/lib/ --enable-ft2232_libftdi
Hi Andrey,
Error: type 'xscale' is missing write_phys_memory
Error: type 'xscale' is missing read_phys_memory
Ignore these errors. They are only reminders to the developers
to add this support to the xscale target.
Try writing up a fresh bug report using these guidelines:
Hi Øyvind,
Thanks for your previous message. Do you have any idea about the nature
of the following runtime error (I get it when I try to protect a
memory part for blob)?
reset halt
JTAG tap: imote2.cpu tap/device found: 0x79265013 (mfg: 0x009, part:
0x9265, ver: 0x7)
target state: halted
Have you tried:
https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2009-November/012907.html
--
Øyvind Harboe
US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 63 25 00
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex
JTAG debugger and flash programmer
Thank you for referring to this. It solved the problem.
Regarding the previous problem couldn't open blob-im2 I also solved
it: I needed to run both 'openocd' and 'telnet localhost ' from the
same directory (my mistake).
Cheers,
Andrey
Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Have you tried:
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 14:05 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Hi Andrey,
Error: type 'xscale' is missing write_phys_memory
Error: type 'xscale' is missing read_phys_memory
Ignore these errors. They are only reminders to the developers
to add this support to the xscale target.
I saw these two
On Thursday 26 November 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 14:05 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Hi Andrey,
Error: type 'xscale' is missing write_phys_memory
Error: type 'xscale' is missing read_phys_memory
Ignore these errors. They are only reminders to the developers
to
Error: type 'xscale' is missing write_phys_memory
Error: type 'xscale' is missing read_phys_memory
In this case a minimal correct implementation of those two
methods would be to return ERROR_FAIL. Obviously, something
that does the relevant hard work would be better.
Committed that