There is as much (or as little) functionality as existed in the past.
I think its better to have --with-ftd2xx-includes and --with-ftd2xx-libs
options, but this an area where my autotools expertise still remains a
bit fuzzy. However, the FTD2XX libraries are x86-only and proprietary;
are you building on something else but targeting that architecture? :)
--Z
On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 10:13 +0200, Nico Coesel wrote:
I didn't look at the patch but is there a way to force the directory to
aid cross-compiling?
Nico Coesel
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de
[mailto:openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de] Namens
Zach Welch
Verzonden: dinsdag 21 april 2009 9:59
Aan: openocd-development
Onderwerp: [Openocd-development] [PATCH] improve Linux ftd2xx
configure-timesupport
Hi all,
The attached patch rewrites the configure script section that
handles detecting the Linux FTD2XX libraries. It no longer
assumes anything, so it may cause breakage on some
distributions. I tested it against installed copies of
0.4.13 and 0.4.16 on Gentoo, along with both static and
shared options under --with-ftd2xx-linux-tardir.
In truth, I do not think this can do any real harm, as it
makes the same kinds of assumptions as were made previously.
It simply verifies that the files are actually there, so
anyone that had it working before now will have already been
setting up the proper LDFLAGS or other magic.
It also changes the output to be more configure-like. Please apply.
Cheers,
Zach
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
