All said.
(mk)
--
Matthias Kurz; Fuldastr. 3; D-28199 Bremen; VOICE +49 421 53 600 47
Im prämotorischen Cortex kann jeder ein Held sein. (bdw)
__
The OpenPKG Projectwww.openpkg.org
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005, Matthias Kurz wrote:
This is my last version. I have to move on.
Thanks for your efforts, Matthias. I've taken over your patch for
OpenPKG-CURRENT. See http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=22027 for
details.
Ralf S. Engelschall
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005, Matthias Kurz wrote:
All said.
But apache2.spec contains a Conflicts: apache. Isn't this enough? I
though if one package contains the Conflicts: RPM will complain. Do we
really need a Conflicts: apache2 also in apache.spec?
Ralf S.
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005, Matthias Kurz wrote:
All said.
I want to make the proposal of renaming the apache2 package to httpd.
This would align the name with Linux Distros and ASF terminology. It
would also allow both packages to coexist for a prolonged time and no
longer suggest that the apache2
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005, Thomas Lotterer wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005, Matthias Kurz wrote:
All said.
I want to make the proposal of renaming the apache2 package to httpd.
This would align the name with Linux Distros and ASF terminology. It
would also allow both packages to coexist for a prolonged
OpenPKG Version Tracking Report
===
Reporting Time:2005-02-14 18:51
Tracking Duration: 0:38:23 (H:M:S)
Tracking Input:1445 sources (847 packages)
Tracking Result: 1366 up-to-date, 18 out-dated, 61 error
The following 18 sources were determined to be
We should they conflict? In our environment we actually have specific
need to run both versions. We cannot have both installed however due to
as far as we can tell only two conflicting files which are a man page
and logrotate. Personally, it seems to me that it would be better to
rename the
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005, David M. Fetter wrote:
We should they conflict? In our environment we actually have specific
need to run both versions. We cannot have both installed however due to
as far as we can tell only two conflicting files which are a man page
and logrotate. Personally, it
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 21:51 +0100, Matthias Kurz wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005, David M. Fetter wrote:
We should they conflict? In our environment we actually have specific
need to run both versions. We cannot have both installed however due to
as far as we can tell only two conflicting
As David says, I have been thinking of making an apache2 package that doesn't
conflict with apache. I have yet to do that for a couple of reasons.
First, we also use the shared core features and apxs also conflicts between
the two. I haven't decided whether I want to rename apxs to apxs2 or
OpenPKG Version Tracking Report
===
Reporting Time:2005-02-15 06:46
Tracking Duration: 0:33:35 (H:M:S)
Tracking Input:1445 sources (847 packages)
Tracking Result: 1365 up-to-date, 21 out-dated, 59 error
The following 21 sources were determined to be
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005, David M. Fetter wrote:
[...]
Yes, what would be nice is if we could make a Require statement that can
include something like apache||apache2. That would be helpful in
numerous cases.
Yes, but alternative requirements are not supported by RPM. The only
thing one can do
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005, Mark Keller wrote:
As David says, I have been thinking of making an apache2 package that doesn't
conflict with apache. I have yet to do that for a couple of reasons.
First, we also use the shared core features and apxs also conflicts between
the two. I haven't
13 matches
Mail list logo
