Re: implict and explicit requirements (Was: Re: HEADS UP: Apache 2.2 is coming...)

2007-07-24 Thread Christoph Schug
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: On Wed, Jul 11, 2007, Thomas Lotterer wrote: The topic is about how to handle with_foo for a with_foo_bar option that only makes sense in concert with with_foo. On Tue, Jul 10, 2007, Christoph Schug wrote: For me, it looks more

Re: implict and explicit requirements (Was: Re: HEADS UP: Apache 2.2 is coming...)

2007-07-24 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007, Christoph Schug wrote: [...] Well, another question regarding both PHP packages, 'php' and 'apache-php'. Why is there a run-time requirement for a MTA by default? I thought this is exactly why we have the 'with_sendmail' option. If no one speaks up, I will drop the

implict and explicit requirements (Was: Re: HEADS UP: Apache 2.2 is coming...)

2007-07-11 Thread Thomas Lotterer
The topic is about how to handle with_foo for a with_foo_bar option that only makes sense in concert with with_foo. On Tue, Jul 10, 2007, Christoph Schug wrote: For me, it looks more like the second [implicit] case, but I might be wrong. If not, there should be some fiddling in the fixing

Re: implict and explicit requirements (Was: Re: HEADS UP: Apache 2.2 is coming...)

2007-07-11 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007, Thomas Lotterer wrote: The topic is about how to handle with_foo for a with_foo_bar option that only makes sense in concert with with_foo. On Tue, Jul 10, 2007, Christoph Schug wrote: For me, it looks more like the second [implicit] case, but I might be wrong. If

Re: HEADS UP: Apache 2.2 is coming...

2007-07-10 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007, Christoph Schug wrote: On Fri, Jun 22, 2007, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: On Fri, Jun 22, 2007, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: Just a heads up: we recently investigated a lot into the packaging of Apache 2.2 in OpenPKG-CURRENT. Now it seems to be time to _finally_

Re: HEADS UP: Apache 2.2 is coming...

2007-06-25 Thread Christoph Schug
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007, Torsten Homeyer wrote: Nice, but . I can't tell for the others but, I'm missing an apache1 package. Regards, Torsten I don't see many valid points left nowadays in having an Apache 1.3 despite the fact that maintenance of many packages using

Re: HEADS UP: Apache 2.2 is coming...

2007-06-23 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: On Fri, Jun 22, 2007, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: Just a heads up: we recently investigated a lot into the packaging of Apache 2.2 in OpenPKG-CURRENT. Now it seems to be time to _finally_ switch the apache package from Apache 1.3 to Apache

HEADS UP: Apache 2.2 is coming...

2007-06-22 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
Just a heads up: we recently investigated a lot into the packaging of Apache 2.2 in OpenPKG-CURRENT. Now it seems to be time to _finally_ switch the apache package from Apache 1.3 to Apache 2.2. The apache2-xxx packages will become apache-xxx, too. Once I've got APR cleaned up and extended today

Re: HEADS UP: Apache 2.2 is coming...

2007-06-22 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: Just a heads up: we recently investigated a lot into the packaging of Apache 2.2 in OpenPKG-CURRENT. Now it seems to be time to _finally_ switch the apache package from Apache 1.3 to Apache 2.2. The apache2-xxx packages will become apache-xxx,