On Sat, Jul 19, 2003, Matthias Kurz wrote:
Would patches that implement (as options, turned off by default) shared
libraries and relocation be acceptable?
I'm in a situation that I need those features, but dread having to fork
a set of package spec files etc. for my own use.
I think,
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 11:54:10AM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003, Matthias Kurz wrote:
Would patches that implement (as options, turned off by default) shared
libraries and relocation be acceptable?
I'm in a situation that I need those features, but dread
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003, Matthias Kurz wrote:
[...]
Instead of patching all the many spec-Files that have disable-shared
set etc., wouldn't it be possible to introduce a global setting (with
a default of no).
Yes, I plan for a with_shared option which all packages can support.
I hope
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 02:35:02PM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003, Matthias Kurz wrote:
[...]
Instead of patching all the many spec-Files that have disable-shared
set etc., wouldn't it be possible to introduce a global setting (with
a default of no).
Yes, I
On Sat, 2003-07-19 at 02:54, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003, Matthias Kurz wrote:
Would patches that implement (as options, turned off by default) shared
libraries and relocation be acceptable?
I'm in a situation that I need those features, but dread having to fork
Hi
Would patches that implement (as options, turned off by default) shared
libraries and relocation be acceptable?
I'm in a situation that I need those features, but dread having to fork
a set of package spec files etc. for my own use.
Cheers
Conrad
--
Conrad Steenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
