Am Mittwoch, 22. März 2006 11:06 schrieb Ralf S. Engelschall:
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
[...non-english private request...]
It was my mistake using the client. :(
Please be careful and do not post in non-English language or with
private requests on the public mailing
* Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060322 08:19]:
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006, Dietrich Bollmann wrote:
Is there some installation management tool like 'yum' for dealing with
rpm package dependencies?
Yes, install the openpkg-tools package. It provides an openpkg build
tool which is able
I don't have anything fancy, but I use packages from many of the openpkg releases to create my own set of tools. For example, I might use gcc from 2.4 release, many things from 2.5 release and some misc stuff from current. I have some cpp code that reads a list of packages and pulls the xml chunk
I would love, LOVE to see this happen so that I can both centralize
builds and make certain that I get some packages always built with the
same options, grab things from CURRENT when necessary, etc.
--bak
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 04:34:46PM -0500, Doug Henry wrote:
I don't have anything fancy,
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006, bak wrote:
I would love, LOVE to see this happen so that I can both centralize
builds and make certain that I get some packages always built with the
same options, grab things from CURRENT when necessary, etc.
The way we handle it here is that we mirror the OpenPKG site
Hi Bill Rest.
* Bill Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060325 00:44]:
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006, bak wrote:
*snip*
Our nightly mirror update script first rsync's the directories
from the OpenPKG.org site to the appropriate directories here,
then hard links new *.src.rpm packages into the private
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006, skaar wrote:
This doesn't answer the question on how one would use the
openpkg build'' command to update a system from a binary
repository which is something that would be very useful when
maintaining appliance'' type servers that have identical
hardware.
actually, if
On another note: I noticed both yum and urpmi are in -current but
neither would build out of the box for me on Debian 3.1 or Solaris
10. Is anyone using these? Is there any interest in getting them to
work within the OpenPKG framework?
I've spent some time recently making both yum and urpmi
* skaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060325 01:19]:
This doesn't answer the question on how one would use the
openpkg build'' command to update a system from a binary
repository which is something that would be very useful when
maintaining appliance'' type servers that have identical
hardware.
Great! Just tried it. This is exactly what I was looking for. As noted
in your other email, it is kind of slow so it may well be worth
investing more time into getting yum and/or urpmi working. If I can be
of any help in porting / testing these I'd be more than willing to do
so. Just contact
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006, skaar wrote:
* Bill Campbell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060324 18:36]:
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006, skaar wrote:
This doesn't answer the question on how one would use the
openpkg build'' command to update a system from a binary
repository which is something that would be very
11 matches
Mail list logo
