Hi,
I've been looking at OpenPkg now for several days and like what I see, but
I seem to be missing somethings:
I'm using Whitebox Linux (a RedHat Enterprise 3 clone) which isn't
supported. What could I do to the bootstrap procedure to convince openpkg
I'm using RHEL3 so I can just download th
Hello,
I'm having trouble using openpkg build on FreeBSD and am consistently
getting an I/O error. I am not sure how to identify the problem further.
I installed the following openpkg packages by hand (built locally):
bash-2.05a# pwd
/openpkg/RPM/PKG
bash-2.05a# /openpkg/bin/openpkg rpm -qa
openp
Hello All,
I've been comparing some OpenPKG rpms against rpms from other RPM
distributions. One thing I hadn't noticed before is that (at least with
Postfix) the resultant binary packages are much larger than their native
equivalents[1]. This appears to be due to the fact that many libraries
I see most packages are compiled in with the fsl library and this is
configured to log to a local file in //var/ but I don't
follow the fsl documentation well enough to make the logging just go to
syslog.
I tried configuring /openpkg/etc/fsl/fsl.postfix as follows but this did
not seem to work
Hello all,
Inspite of reading the documentation several times I am still confused
about the different openpkg "user/groups" which can be configured when
building the initial openpkg bootstrap package (and their usage
thereafter).
By mistake I installed a 2.3 over the top of a running /openpkg (
Hello all,
I am getting the following problems with emacs when trying to build on
openpkg-2.3. The build platform is an up to date Whitebox Linux (a RedHat
Enterprise 3.0 clone). I know this is not a supported configuration but
this is the only issue I have come across since starting using open
Doug Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon J Mudd wrote:
> > Doug Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >>Henri - I got the exact same results with GCC 3.3.6 (from CURRENT). It
> >>seems that the compile works fine, but the spec file is wro
Doug Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Henri - I got the exact same results with GCC 3.3.6 (from CURRENT). It
> seems that the compile works fine, but the spec file is wrong. Just
> before it crashes these commands are executed:
>
> + mv /openpkg/RPM/TMP/gcc33-3.3.6-root/openpkg/lib/pthread/l
Doug Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon J Mudd wrote:
>
> >>>( cd obj
> >>> %{l_make} %{l_mflags} install \
> >>> INSTALL="%{l_shtool} install -c" \
> >>> DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
&g
Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> well gcc 3.4.4 is working perfectly on AIX 5.2 PASE but this problem
> at install time prevent me to have a RPM ;(
>
> Reading specs from
> /QOpenSys/usr/local/gcc-3.4.4/bin/../lib/gcc/powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0/3.4.4/specs
> Configured with: ../configure --w
Doug Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon, I got past this by doing the following:
>
> 1) Uninstalling binutils (OpenPKG & RPM versions)
I don't have the binutils rpm installed (AIX rpm).
> 2) Compiling using --define="with_binutils no" switch
Did not help me.
But you are building 3.3.
Although this is slightly off topic I am able to build gcc-3.4.4 on AIX
5.1 using the following script after untarring the tar ball and cd'ing
into the gcc-3.4.4 directory.
#!/usr/bin/bash
#
# script to build gcc-3.4.4
mkdir obj
cd obj
# use a proper value later
export BUILDHOST=powerpc-ibm-a
I have managed to get the 3.4.4 gcc to build on AIX 5.1 using the
following "hacks" to the standard rpm spec file.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] COS4 ~]$ diff -u gcc.spec.orig gcc.spec
--- gcc.spec.orig 2005-07-22 08:35:44.018919511 +0200
+++ gcc.spec2005-07-22 08:35:38.505805263 +0200
@@ -37,18 +
Doug Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[snip]
> > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{l_prefix}/lib/$subdir
> > done
> > mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{l_prefix}/${triple}/include/* \
> >Ralf S. Engelschall
> >[EMAIL PRO
Doug Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[snip]
> All I did was grab the CVS version of gcc.spec and rebuild the rpm -
> openpkg rpm -bb gcc.spec --define="l_cc gcc" --define="with_binutils no".
Understood. I assume that you did NOT have the openpkg binutils rpm
installed? If it is installed, i
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/openpkg/RPM/SRC/gcc>/openpkg/bin/openpkg rpm -q openpkg
openpkg-20050613-20050613
I am seeing the following references to /etc/mtab every time an rpm
is being installed or removed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/openpkg/RPM/SRC/gcc>/openpkg/bin/openpkg rpm --erase binutils
error: failed
Doug Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've been successful in compiling a fair number of packages for AIX
> 5.1. So far the only problems have been related to binutils. Since
> some packages require it as a build prereq I installed it, but then
> virtually every package after that fails to co
Hello All,
As different people are looking at the OpenPKG port to AIX I've added a
Wiki link on the OpenPKG Wiki site. This should allow us all to provide
our input in a common place and it should help us to see the current
issues which still need to be resolved.
Regards,
Simon
___
This is the error message I get from the following command:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/openpkg/RPM/PKG>/openpkg/bin/openpkg rpm --rebuild
/openpkg/RPM/PKG/postfix-2.2.3-2.4.0.src.rpm
[snip]
cat ../../conf/makedefs.out Makefile.in) >Makefile
[src/discard]
(cat ../../conf/makedefs.out Makefile.in) >Makefi
Simon J Mudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[snip]
> OpenPKG
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/openpkg/RPM/PKG>/openpkg/bin/openpkg rpm -qa
> openpkg-20050613-20050613
> gcc-3.4.4-20050707.TEST_FOR_AIX
^^^
> fsl-1.6.0-2.4.0
> db-4.3.28.0-2.4.0
Doug Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Looks like an openpkg gcc problem. Any ideas?
> > Regards,
> > Simon
> > __
> > The OpenPKG Projectwww.openpkg.org
> > User Communication List
Simon J Mudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Doug Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Got the same thing - works using --define="l_cc gcc".
>
> Looks like that fixes it. (Building now.) Thanks (and updating Wiki).
Just to confirm: The Postfix bu
"Ralf S. Engelschall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2005, Simon J Mudd wrote:
>
> > As different people are looking at the OpenPKG port to AIX I've added a
> > Wiki link on the OpenPKG Wiki site. This should allow us all to provide
> &
Christian Reiber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Do you have any automated scripts for building everything?
> >
> Simon, I have a Perl script which creates a Makefile from RPMs and
> SRPMs if it is of any help. It is "prerelease" however which means it
> fits my needs but have never tried it
Hello All,
Doug sent me some feedback on the building he has been doing so I have
updated the wiki. Thanks. This should help everyone see the status of
OpenPKG on 2.4/CURRENT more easily.
I have also put the OpenPKG BINARY rpms that _I_ have built on my own
ftp/web site in case they are of inte
Hi,
I've just noticed something I don't really understand. Perhaps someone can
explain what is happening.
I had some problems trying to compile lftp and now bind.
Both gave me errors:
checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C
compiler cannot create executables
Just to follow up my own post a little.
Simon J Mudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So removing libiconv makes gcc "work". I am now compiling bind9 again
> it it looks like it will complete.
It does.
> Can someone explain why installing libiconv makes gcc fail, and
Doug Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I ran into this same issue (see thread "AIX linking with
> LIBICONV"). What I did to solve it was:
>
> 1) Remove RPM version of libiconv
> 2) Rebuild OpenPKG GCC after building/installing OpenPKG libiconv
> 3) Rebuild any other package that linked to lib
Hello All,
Doug seems to have solved this, though I don't understand how.
I tried to test the method to build and install libiconv and get it to
work with gcc.
Steps taken:
...
- build and install OpenPKG libiconv rpm
- uninstall OpenPKG gcc (as it stops working once libiconv is installed)
-
Doug Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Steps taken:
> >>
> >> ...
> >> - build and install OpenPKG libiconv rpm
> >> - uninstall OpenPKG gcc (as it stops working once libiconv is installed)
> >> - build OpenPKG gcc using the gcc that comes from the OpenPKG rpm
> >> (the one that's built wit
Doug Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon J Mudd wrote:
> > Doug Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >>>>Steps taken:
> >>>>
> >>>>...
> >>>>- build and install OpenPKG libiconv rpm
> >>
Mr Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When you talk of daemons Arch uses /etc/rc.d for start up scripts so I
> could write one to start openpkg if required ...or add it to rc.local
>
> What I need to do is some load up openpkg (read the manual lol)
>
> Which version do you suggest I try first ?
Simon J Mudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If it DOES work then you use openpkg itself to install/build the rpms
> you need. It is generally easier to use get openpkg-tools built as
> this package automates the whole process of satisfy dependencies,
> download, build & inst
Michael van Elst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 09:47:48AM +0200, Simon J Mudd wrote:
>
> > 1. Install openpkg
> > 2. install openpkg-tools dependencies (make, gcc, perl)
> > 3. install openpkg-tools
>
> One interesting part of the firs
When doing a fresh install of openpkg from current I notice the following
installing openpkg binary openpkg-20050920-20050920.powerpc-aix5.1-ope.sh
OpenPKG CURRENT Binary Bootstrap Package, version 20050920
Built for prefix /openpkg on target platform powerpc-aix5.1
++ hooking OpenPKG instance i
"Ralf S. Engelschall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2005, Simon J Mudd wrote:
>
> > When doing a fresh install of openpkg from current I notice the following
> >
> > installing openpkg binary openpkg-20050920-20050920.powerpc-aix5.1-ope
Simon J Mudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is not serious but probably worth tidying up. I'll try the
> same thing with the 2.4.2 package to see if the behaviour is
> identical.
On openpkg-2.4.2-2.4.2 the behaviour is similar but not
identical. There is no error a
Stijn De Weirdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hi all,
>
> i just installed openpkg on scientific linux 3, which is a clone of rhel3.
> so i used
> sh openpkg-2.4.0-2.4.0.ix86-rhel3-openpkg.sh --prefix=/opt/openpkg
> to install openpkg.
> the result was:
>
> OpenPKG 2.4-RELEASE Binary Bootstrap P
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:17:48PM +0200, Steve Weinreich wrote:
>
> --On Mittwoch, 12. Oktober 2005 15:54 +0200 Stijn De Weirdt
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >hi all,
> >
> >i just installed openpkg on scientific linux 3, which is a clone of rhel3.
> >so i used
> >sh openpkg-2.4.0-2.4.0.ix86
"Ralf S. Engelschall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2005, Simon J Mudd wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:17:48PM +0200, Steve Weinreich wrote:
> > >
> > > --On Mittwoch, 12. Oktober 2005 15:54 +0200 Stijn De Weirdt
> &
"Ralf S. Engelschall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2005, Andreas Schmidt wrote:
>
> > i have three questions about the new registration-requirements:
> >
> > does this mean, that i have to register every single instance of ofbiz
> > if i don't want to set up a mirror of the openp
I appeared to have openpkg working with the openpkg-registry package with
openpkg-2.4.2-2.4.2.
I have just upgraded to openpkg-2.5.0-2.5.0 and want to upgrade my installed
packages.
I have therefore done a
/openpkg/bin/openpkg build -Ua > build.sh
The output is as follows (trunated)
# build.p
"Ralf S. Engelschall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2005, Simon J Mudd wrote:
>
> > I appeared to have openpkg working with the openpkg-registry package with
> > openpkg-2.4.2-2.4.2.
> > I have just upgraded to openpkg-2.5.0-2.5.0 and wa
Hi,
I have now correctly got my system to register and it is checking
daily for any updates.
I notice that on http://registry.openpkg.org/?page=association the
"active" instance is marked with a "date" of the 30-11-2005.
Is this date supposed to show the last access to the OpenPKG system or
is i
It looks like the rrdtool does not check that tcl is available and if not will
fail.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] COS4 bin]# uname -a
Linux ams03.wl0.org 2.6.9-22.0.1.EL #1 Thu Oct 27 12:26:11 CDT 2005 i686 athlon
i386 GNU/Linux
The build error is shown below:
gsize.o librrd_th_la-rrd_create.o librrd_th_
"Ralf S. Engelschall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2005, Simon J Mudd wrote:
>
> > It looks like the rrdtool does not check that tcl is available and if not
> > will fail.
> > [...]
>
> The problem is that on your platform Tcl
Hi Doug,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Doug Summers) writes:
> I've had no problems building OpenPKG 2.5.x on AIX 5.1 with any
> maintenance level, but not on AIX 5.2 (tried with ML3 & ML5 machines):
We have recently obtained a new server which will run 5.3. I think
that AIX < 5.3 (5.2?) is not supported o
Doug Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I haven't been pursuing 5.3 lately as our dept. changed and I know
> longer have full access to a 5.3 machine. This will change in 1Q06 as
> I will be upgrading all of my 5.1 machines to 5.3. I just got 2.5.1 to
> compile on 5.2 and will focusing on opens
Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Did there is a chance we see one day OpenPKG AIX binaries available
> for download and use ?
While this WAS work in progress and I no longer have access to the
machine I was building on some binary RPMs I built can be found at:
ftp://ftp.WL0.org/openpkg
I'm still trying to determine exactly what is happening but the symptoms
are as follows:
The startup of OpenPKG 2.5's /etc/init.d/openpkg on Centos 4.2 when
starting in runlevel 3 (normal network) or 5 (graphical startup)
just hangs. There is no output or error messages.
Running /etc/init.d/open
Bill Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2006, Simon J Mudd wrote:
> >I'm still trying to determine exactly what is happening but the symptoms
> >are as follows:
> >
> >The startup of OpenPKG 2.5's /etc/init.d/openpkg on Centos 4.2 whe
"Thomas Lotterer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon J Mudd<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 2005-12-14 19:48:55:
> > I notice that on http://registry.openpkg.org/?page=association the
> > "active" instance is marked with a [constant] "date"
Torsten Homeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 21, 2006, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> Thus I am suggesting the following patch (only minimally tested).
> [...]
> >> +{ ! ps -elf|grep postfix/m[a]ster >/dev/null 2>&1 && \
> >> + /kolab/l
Doug Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 09, 2006, Doug Summers wrote:
> >
> >>Using OpenPKG 2.5.1 with the following rpm's installed:
> >>
> >>binutils-2.16.1-2.5.0
> >>bison-2.1-2.5.0
> >>flex-2.5.31-2.5.0
> >>libiconv-1.10-2.5.0
> >>m4-1.4.3-2.5.0
>
Simon J Mudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think I have found the problem and solution.
[...]
>
> I installed glibc-devel.i386 and then tested the test program that
> failed before. This now builds without problems. I am retrying to
> build OpenPKG gcc again and hope t
"Ralf S. Engelschall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2006, Simon J Mudd wrote:
>
> > [...]
> > On a side-note I don't know what the rpms come out with a
> > amd64-rhel4-ope suffix as the server has twin 3GHz Xeon processors. Th
I tried to follow the instructions given and have found a problem.
Not sure how to diagnose it.
Running RHEL4 (actually centos-release-4-3.2) on i386.
I've installed the new openpkg rpm, removed openpkg-registry and rebuilt
openpkg-tools. I also reregistered my email.
# openpkg rpm -qa | grep op
Michael van Elst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 06:54:38PM +0200, Simon J Mudd wrote:
>
> > # now upgrade the whole OpenPKG instance, in correct
> > # dependency order and by keeping all chosen build-time options.
> > # $prefix/bin/open
Michael van Elst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 09:26:59AM +0200, Simon J Mudd wrote:
>
> > Regarding the MTA issue it might be nice if there were a system-mta
> > package which does nothing more than provide symbolic links from
> > $pref
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Simon J Mudd) writes:
> Michael van Elst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 09:26:59AM +0200, Simon J Mudd wrote:
> >
> > > Regarding the MTA issue it might be nice if there were a system-mta
> > > package whi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael van Elst) writes:
> On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 03:33:33PM +0200, Simon J Mudd wrote:
>
> > > Upgraded postfix to openpkg-import. Thanks.
> >
> > This breaks 'openpkg build -Ua' as shown below:
>
>
> openpkg-import defaul
"Thomas Lotterer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[snip]
> In the meantime, here is a workaround: run
>
> # openpkg rpm -q --whatprovides MTA
>
> to figure out which of the currently installed package provides MTA. This
> should list "postfix" in your case. Then add a hint to "openpkg build" telling
Bill Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Jul 02, 2006, Thomas Lotterer wrote:
> On Sunday, 2. July 2006 at 3:44 pm, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> It looks like openpkg-import is not included in the 2.20060628 branch.
> >>
> >The package was omitted by intention. The openpkg-impo
Bill Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2006, Simon J Mudd wrote:
> >Bill Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> On Sun, Jul 02, 2006, Thomas Lotterer wrote:
> >> >>>> On Sunday, 2. July 2006 at 3:44 pm, <[EMAI
Hi Doug,
Doug Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks, Ralph. [snip] The
> software is really coming along. I have a fairly nice set of AIX 5.3
> binaries built now and I will have time next week to build a generic
> set. Is there any space out there for me to upload these? Here's what
> I h
Doug Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> << SNIP >>
> OK - working on AIX 5.1 w/32-bit kernel.
Hi Doug,
Do you have any details of the current state of your efforts with the
OpenPKG AIX port?
i.e. How you are using it and what special steps need to be taken to
get it to work (in your environ
Doug Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon J Mudd wrote:
> > Doug Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> << SNIP >>
> >
> >> OK - working on AIX 5.1 w/32-bit kernel.
> > Hi Doug,
> > Do you have any details
Doug Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can put it in but I'm not quite done with my documentation. Give me
> the link so I can update it later.
http://wiki.openpkg.org/?BuildingOpenPKGunderAIX
I'm happy with you completely removing the older build stuff I put on there
as it is out of date.
I'm trying to build python on AIX 5.3 using the OpenPKG 2.5 rpms.
The python build fails with shtool complaining:
/openpkg/2.5/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.17996: /openpkg/2.5/lib/openpkg/shtool: /bin/sh:
bad interpreter: Arg list too long
/bin/sh in AIX is linked to /usr/bin/ksh, the native AIX korn shell.
Doug Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After many headaches I've finally got OpenPKG-STABLE built on AIX
> 4.3.3 through 5.3. I will be updating the OpenPKG Wiki pages sometime
> in the following weeks.
>
> As I just completed the AIX 4.3.3 builds the binary list is very small
> (building gcc
Doug Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After I finish my toolset upgrades I'll try building python.
I'll try and rebuild python on OpenPKG-STABLE or CURRENT, but looking
at the rpmdiff[1] output between openpkg-2.5.0-2.5.0.src.rpm and
openpkg-20061030-20061030.src.rpm I can't see anything tha
"Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Did you plan to make OpenPKG for AIX binaries available ?
No official plans exist as this is a company internal project to
_evaluate_ the use of OpenPKG to simplify the installation of custom
software on our AIX installations.
While I don't anticipate
Doug Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Trying to get this version updated (currently using the 10.18.2006
> release). I'm getting this error during the build of tar, which is
> exactly what I was getting with coreutils 6.3 (fixed in the new 6.4
> release):
>
> /opt/openpkg/bin/../lib/gcc/powe
Simon J Mudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Doug Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > After I finish my toolset upgrades I'll try building python.
>
> I'll try and rebuild python on OpenPKG-STABLE or CURRENT, but looking
> at the rpmdiff[1] out
Doug Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I had no luck building python but I'm going to keep trying. I remember
> running into this problem awhile back but don't remember if a fix was
> created.
Well it should be easy enough tomorrow for me to hack shtool to use
bash as the shell and at least s
To followup my own post:
Simon J Mudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well it should be easy enough tomorrow for me to hack shtool to use
> bash as the shell and at least see if that allows the build to
> complete.
Changing the installed openpkg shtool shell manually to
$prefix/l
"Ralf S. Engelschall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Ralf, if you are following this thread, have you not come across
> > issues similar to this before? (native /bin/sh limitations compared to
> > Linux's /bin/sh which is normally /bin/bash?)
>
> Your problem seems to be more that AIX' shell com
Sorry for not coming back to confirm if Ralf's suggestion fixed the problem.
I am very pressed for time and so have not been able to do more than make
the change suggested by Ralf to see if that resolved the shtool problem.
It does, but the build failed for me, I think due to a separate problem
re
"Doug Henry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm trying to setup what I thought was an easy email system. I have two
> offline computers, and I want to simply send SMTP traffic back and forth. I
> have tried postfix, sendmail, and exim. I am missing something very
> fundamental because I get the
I've just built openpkg-2.20070322-2.20070322 for use with virus
scanning. I'm using clamav / amavisd / spamassassin but the system
postfix server. The server is running RHEL4.
I built openpkg with --prefix=/openpkg/2 --user=openpkg --group=openpkg to
get the openpkg-2.20070322-2.20070322.amd64-
Doug Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> POSTFIX
> >> This package (like many others) assumes IBM's XLC compiler and fails
> >> unless
> >> -Duse_cc=gcc is used. This should be forced for AIX.
> > Hmmm... this unfortunately is a problem. If we force it to use GCC
> > this means all AIX us
Doug Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Doug Summers wrote:
> > <>
> >> OK - I got it a clean build to work, using these IBM rpm's:
> >> gcc-4.0.0-1
> >> gcc-c++-4.0.0-1
> >> libgcc-4.0.0-1
> >> libstdc++-4.0.0-1
> >> libstdc++-devel-4.0.0-1
> >> m4-1.4.1-1
> >> make-3.80-1
> >>
> >> Obviously
82 matches
Mail list logo
