More comments inline:
> -Original Message-
> From: praveen malviya
> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 5:14 PM
> To: Mathivanan Naickan Palanivelu
> Cc: Hans Feldt; Nagendra Kumar; opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 6 of 6] amf: handle sufailover in SU FSM and Comp FSM
>
On 06/25/2013 01:43 PM, praveen malviya wrote:
> Thanks for the comments and discussion. I will respond for other
> comments soon, as of now starting with this mail.
> Please see the response below.
>
> One more point can be brought into discussion here. The case is when
> admin restart operation
On 25-Jun-13 4:24 PM, Hans Feldt wrote:
>
> On 06/25/2013 11:50 AM, Mathivanan Naickan Palanivelu wrote:
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Hans Feldt [mailto:hans.fe...@ericsson.com]
>
- I'm sure you would have had a reason to do it this way, but I
thought
>>> alternatively perfo
Thanks for the comments and discussion. I will respond for other
comments soon, as of now starting with this mail.
Please see the response below.
One more point can be brought into discussion here. The case is when
admin restart operation is invoked on the component and
saAmfDisableRestart is t
Ack
-Nagu
-Original Message-
From: Nagendra Kumar
Sent: 31 May 2013 17:16
To: Hans Feldt; Praveen Malviya
Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amfnd: fix admin comp restart to terminate
[#7]
Few early comment:
1. Please change the name of com
On 06/25/2013 11:50 AM, Mathivanan Naickan Palanivelu wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Hans Feldt [mailto:hans.fe...@ericsson.com]
>>> - I'm sure you would have had a reason to do it this way, but I thought
>> alternatively performing the repair at the AMFND itself(instead of notifyi
I would like to announce that OpenSAF now has a policy regarding
limits: limits should, in general, be possible to configure without
recompiling the source code. This means that we would like to move
away from using hard-coded limits, and we would like the code to be
designed in scalable way so tha
To add on, my comments at a high level, is also to nitpick any possible
problems born out of parallelism.
-Mathi.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mathivanan Naickan Palanivelu
> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 3:20 PM
> To: Hans Feldt
> Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [d
> -Original Message-
> From: Hans Feldt [mailto:hans.fe...@ericsson.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 3:01 PM
> To: Mathivanan Naickan Palanivelu
> Cc: Praveen Malviya; Nagendra Kumar; opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 6 of 6] amf: handle sufailover in SU FSM and C
On 06/24/2013 04:39 PM, Mathivanan Naickan Palanivelu wrote:
> Hi Praveen,
>
> Thanks for the clarification.
> Please find some other comments below:
>
> - I'm sure you would have had a reason to do it this way, but I thought
> alternatively performing the repair at the AMFND itself(instead of no
10 matches
Mail list logo
