ACK not tested
-AVM
On 8/25/2016 10:06 AM, Vo Minh Hoang wrote:
> Dear Mahesh,
>
> Logic of this part is complicated so I modified it wrong.
> This time I correct it, not a roll back.
> That part is subsequence of if clause above.
>
> Sincerely,
> Hoang
>
> -Original Message-
> From: A V
Ack.
I think implementation details should go in PR doc also(not to mention
internal amfd and amfnd changes).
Thanks,
Praveen
On 23-Aug-16 12:44 PM, Long HB Nguyen wrote:
> osaf/services/saf/amf/README | 72
>
> 1 files changed, 72 insertions(+),
Dear Mahesh,
Logic of this part is complicated so I modified it wrong.
This time I correct it, not a roll back.
That part is subsequence of if clause above.
Sincerely,
Hoang
-Original Message-
From: A V Mahesh [mailto:mahesh.va...@oracle.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 11:21 AM
Hi All,
Please provide your feedback on these patches.
Thanks,
Praveen
On 16-Aug-16 11:20 AM, praveen.malv...@oracle.com wrote:
> Summary: Support for CSI attribute change callback. [#1553]
> Review request for Trac Ticket(s): #1553
> Peer Reviewer(s): AMF maintainers
> Pull request to: <>
>
Ack from me.
Thanks,
Praveen
On 25-Aug-16 8:09 AM, Vu Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Any comments on the PR?
>
>
>
> Regards, Vu
>
>
>
> *From:* Vu Minh Nguyen [mailto:vu.m.ngu...@dektech.com.au]
> *Sent:* Monday, August 15, 2016 6:46 PM
> *To:* Lennart Lund ; 'Minh
ACK
-AVM
On 8/25/2016 8:08 AM, Vu Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
> Hi Mahesh,
>
> Any comments on the PR?
>
> Regards, Vu
>
> *From:* Lennart Lund [mailto:lennart.l...@ericsson.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 17, 2016 5:50 PM
> *To:* Vu Minh Nguyen ; mahesh.va...@oracle.com
>
Hi Hoang,
Is this rollback of `ckpt: fix cppcheck warning [#1874]` ?
===
@@ -4766,6 +4758,13 @@ static uint32_t cpnd_transfer_replica(CP
total_num++;
tmp_sec_info =
Hi,
Any comments on the PR?
Regards, Vu
From: Vu Minh Nguyen [mailto:vu.m.ngu...@dektech.com.au]
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 6:46 PM
To: Lennart Lund ; 'Minh Hon Chau'
; 'praveen malviya'
Cc:
Hi Mahesh,
Any comments on the PR?
Regards, Vu
From: Lennart Lund [mailto:lennart.l...@ericsson.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 5:50 PM
To: Vu Minh Nguyen ; mahesh.va...@oracle.com
Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [devel] Review
osaf/services/saf/cpsv/cpd/cpd_proc.c | 4 ++--
osaf/services/saf/cpsv/cpnd/cpnd_evt.c | 11 ++-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/osaf/services/saf/cpsv/cpd/cpd_proc.c
b/osaf/services/saf/cpsv/cpd/cpd_proc.c
--- a/osaf/services/saf/cpsv/cpd/cpd_proc.c
Hi Nagu,
Second thought, Praveen's one is better I think. You can try with his patch.
Thanks
Minh
On 24/08/16 22:21, minh chau wrote:
> Hi Nagu,
>
> Can you please apply the below patch on top of
> 1725_02_V2_bugfix_resend_buffer_in_set_leds.diff?
> In your test, PL3 get set_leds, but PL-4 has
Hi Nagu,
Can you please apply the below patch on top of
1725_02_V2_bugfix_resend_buffer_in_set_leds.diff?
In your test, PL3 get set_leds, but PL-4 has not, so SU2 can not respond
su_si msg.
@Praveen: Thanks for you help, I guess SU2 need to be ready to send
su_si msg at the same as SU1.
diff
Hi Minh,
Any assignment message should be processed after cluster timer expiry
and node sync timer expiry. The bug fix patch
1725_02_V2_bugfix_resend_buffer_in_set_leds.diff honors cluster timer
expiry but not node sync timer.
After node sync timer expiry, delayed payloads will be rebooted and
The below is the assignments after the test case (SU2 has standby assignment):
PM_SC-1:/home/nagu/views/staging-1725 # /etc/init.d/opensafd status
safSISU=safSu=SU2\,safSg=AmfDemo_2N\,safApp=AmfDemo1,safSi=AmfDemo1,safApp=AmfDemo1
saAmfSISUHAState=STANDBY(2)
Hi Minh,
With 1725_phase_1_V2.tgz, the below email TC has failed. Please find
the traces attached along with the configuration in the ticket.
Thanks
-Nagu
> -Original Message-
> From: Nagendra Kumar
> Sent: 23 August 2016 15:15
> To: Minh Hon Chau; hans.nordeb...@ericsson.com;
Hi Minh,
Please responses inline with [Praveen]
Thanks,
Praveen
On 24-Aug-16 2:01 PM, minh chau wrote:
> Hi Praveen,
>
> I have tested the patches in case all SUs of NpM/Nway belong to one
> nodegroup, it works for me. Will try the case that SUs are partially
> in/out of nodegroup tomorrow.
>
Hi Praveen,
I have tested the patches in case all SUs of NpM/Nway belong to one
nodegroup, it works for me. Will try the case that SUs are partially
in/out of nodegroup tomorrow.
But please, if you have time, can you try to make NpM's ng_admin under
FSM_SG_ADMIN. Addition to my previous
Hi Praveen,
I have just attached to ticket the #1725 part 2 that supports fault of
node restart/poweroff while headless.
Can you help to review it? I will update the patch that adds the logging
as you suggested.
Thanks for reviewing,
Minh
On 24/08/16 16:07, praveen malviya wrote:
> Hi Minh,
Hi Minh,
Please see responses with [Praveen].
Thanks,
Praveen
On 23-Aug-16 7:18 PM, minh chau wrote:
> Hi Praveen,
>
> Please let me copy your questions and answer here in email, so it's
> easier we can add comment in line, please see [Minh].
>
> Thanks,
> Minh
>
>
Hi Anders Widell,
ACK Reviewed & tested IPv4 & IPv6
-AVM
On 8/23/2016 3:34 PM, Anders Widell wrote:
> osaf/services/infrastructure/dtms/dtm/dtm_inter_svc.c|5 +-
> osaf/services/infrastructure/dtms/dtm/dtm_intra.c| 10 +-
>
20 matches
Mail list logo