Hi Nagu,
Normally deadlock happens due to:
- MDS thread (get MDS lock) then acquire cb_lock
- Another Agent thread API call (get cb_lock) then acquire MDS lock.
Yes, I guess it's possible cause deadlock in other applications since we don't
control them when call API.
Best Regards,
Thuan
Hi Minh
ack with 2 minor comments (see below)
Thanks
Gary
On 03/07/18 17:49, Minh Chau wrote:
When THREAD_TRACE_BUFFER enables, it uses by default a list 10240 trace string
as
a circular buffer. There is a concern that how much extra memory of all threads
may use.
This patch makes
Hi Thuan,
Nice work. Ack from me(I am not sure about headless use
case.)
Thanks,
Nagendra, 91-9866424860
www.hasolutions.in
https://www.linkedin.com/company/hasolutions/
High Availability Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
- OpenSAF support and services
- Original
Ack.
regards,
Anders Widell
mån 2018-07-02 klockan 16:15 +0700 skrev Vu Minh Nguyen:
> When user enters subject having slash (/) in, submit-review.sh won't
> work
> with error message: sed: -e expression #1, char 78: unknown option to
> `s'
>
> This patch ensures that all slashes in the input
There is a case that after AMFD send reboot order due to “out of sync window”.
AMFD receive CLM track callback but node is not AMF member yet and delete node.
Later AMFND MDS down will do nothing since it cannot find the node.
When node reboot up, AMFD continue use old msg_id counter send to AMFND
Summary: smf: use cb_lock to sync cbk count access between threads [#2882]
Review request for Ticket(s): 2882
Peer Reviewer(s): Lennart, Gary, Nguyen
Pull request to: Lennart, Gary, Nguyen
Affected branch(es): develop
Development branch: ticket-2882
Base revision:
Sometimes, callback agent dispatch and fail at saSmfReponse()
because cbk list is empty, agent by somehow handle evt before increase
cbk count. To avoid this, use cb_lock to sync cbk count acess between threads.
---
src/smf/agent/smfa_mds.c | 7 ++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1
Hi Gary, Nguyen,
OK, so let remove assert(). I will send out next version soon.
Best Regards,
Thuan
-Original Message-
From: Nguyen Luu
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2018 1:32 PM
To: Gary Lee ; thuan.tran ;
lennart.l...@ericsson.com
Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re:
Hi Thuan,
I also agree with Gary about removing assert(). Other changes look fine.
Thanks,
Nguyen
On 7/11/2018 12:52 PM, Gary Lee wrote:
Hi Thuan
Looks OK to me, but I would remove the assert. We shouldn't do that in library
code.
Thanks
Gary
On 10/7/18, 6:52 pm, "thuan.tran" wrote:
